SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)
Filed by the Registrant ☒
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
|
___________________________________
Filed by the Registrant ý
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:☐
| | | | | |
| ¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐
| |
| ¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☒ | |
| ý | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐
| |
| ¨ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐
| |
| ¨ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ý | | No fee required. |
| ¨ | |
☐
| Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. 0-11 |
| 1.
| 1 | | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| 2.
| 2 | | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| 3.
| 3 | | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| 4.
| 4 | | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
☐ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ¨ | | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| ¨ | |
☐
| Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| 1.
| 1 | | Amount Previously Paid: |
| 2.
| 2 | | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| | 3 | | Filing Party: |
| | 4 | | Date Filed: |
Dear FactSet Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the
20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of FactSet Research Systems Inc., which will be held
at our corporate headquarters at 601 Merritt 7, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851 on
Tuesday,Thursday, December
18, 2018,16, 2021, at 3:00
p.m.PM (Eastern Time).
Our Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted exclusively online via live webcast.
Details of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting are given in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement. Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting,
in person, you are requested to complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided or through Internet
or telephone voting. Your proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. If you do not specify a choice on one of the proposals described in this Proxy Statement, your proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors. If you hold your shares through an account with a brokerage firm or other nominee or fiduciary such as a bank, please follow the instructions you receive from such brokerage firm or other nominee or fiduciary to vote your shares.
If you plan to attend the meeting in person, please respond affirmatively to the request by marking the box on the proxy card. You will be asked to present valid picture identification. No recordings or photography will not be permitted at the meeting.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your continued support and loyalty.
| | |
| Sincerely, |
| |
| |
|  |
| |
| F. Philip Snow |
| Chief Executive Officer |
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
December 18, 2018
16, 2021
The
20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of FactSet Research Systems Inc.
(“FactSet” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, will be held
at the Company’s corporate headquarters at 601 Merritt 7, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851,virtually via live webcast on
Tuesday,Thursday, December
18, 2018,16, 2021, at 3:00
p.m.PM (Eastern Time) for the following purposes:
| 1.
| To elect three directors to the Board of Directors.
|
| 2.
| To ratify the appointment of the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP as FactSet’s independent registered accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2019.
|
| 3.
| To approve, by non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.
|
1.To elect three directors to the Board of Directors.
2.To ratify the appointment of the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2022.
3.To vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.
4.To vote on a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting.
To act upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.
These items are more fully described in the following pages, which are made part of this notice. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on October
24, 2018,22, 2021, are entitled notice of, and to vote at, this
meeting.The Company isAnnual Meeting.
Because of continuing public health concerns resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic and the success of last year's virtual meeting, this year’s Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting to be held via live webcast over the Internet. We believe the use of the Internet to host the Annual Meeting will enable expanded stockholder participation. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting, submit your questions and, if you are a record holder of our common stock or proxy for a record holder, vote your shares during the live webcast of the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FDS2021 and entering your 16-digit control number.
We are pleased to take advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules again this year that allow
FactSetus to furnish these proxy materials, including
itsour Annual Report on Form 10-K, to stockholders on the Internet.
The Company believesWe believe that posting these materials on the Internet expedites stockholders’ receipt of the information that they need, while lowering the costs of printing and delivery and reducing the environmental impact of
itsthe Annual Meeting.
The CompanyWe mailed to
its stockholders of record and beneficial owners the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access these proxy materials, including
FactSet’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K, on the Internet, as well as how to vote by Internet,
telephone and mail.
To request and receive a free paper or email copy of the Proxyproxy materials, please call 1-866-641-4276 and follow the instructions to log in and order the materials by mail, or you may request a copy by(1) visit www.ProxyVote.com, (2) call 1-800-579-1639 or (3) send an email at investorvote@computershare.com with “Proxy Materials FactSet Research Systems Inc.”to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com. If sending an email, please include your control number in the subject line,line. Unless requested, you will not otherwise receive a paper or by logging onto www.envisionreports.com/FDS and click “Cast Your Vote” or “Request Materials.” FactSet encouragesemail copy. We encourage you to record your vote via the Internet as it is convenient and saves on printing costs.
As a stockholder of FactSet, your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the
virtual Annual Meeting,
in person, it is important that you vote as soon as possible to ensure that your shares are represented.
| | |
| BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
| |
| |
| |
| Rachel R. Stern |
| Executive Vice President, General CounselChief Legal Officer, Global Head of Strategic Resources and Secretary |
| Norwalk, Connecticut |
| October 30, 201829, 2021 |
| Page | | | | | | | |
| | Page |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5
|
| | 5
|
| | |
| | 6
|
| | 9
|
| | 9
|
| | 10
|
| | 10
|
| | |
| | |
| | 11
|
| | 11
|
| | 12
|
Director Nominations
| 13
|
| 14
|
| | 15
|
| | 16
|
| | 17
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 29
|
| | 30
|
| | 30
|
| | 31
|
| | 32
|
| | | | | | | | |
Outstanding Equity Awards (Stock Options) at Fiscal Year-End
| 32
|
| 33
|
| | 33
|
Pension Benefits
| 33
| |
| | 33
|
| | 34
|
Compensation Risk Assessment
| 35
|
| 36
|
| | |
| | 37
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 39
|
| | 39
|
| | 40
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.
601 Merritt 7
45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk,
Connecticut 06851CT 06850
PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE
20182021 ANNUAL MEETING
The Board of Directors of FactSet Research Systems Inc. (“FactSet” or the “Company”) delivers this Proxy Statement and voting instructions in connection with the solicitation of proxies, which will be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of FactSet (the “Meeting”). The Meeting will be held virtually via live webcast at 3:00 p.m.PM (Eastern Time) on Tuesday,Thursday, December 18, 2018, at 601 Merritt 7, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851,16, 2021, and any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Notice”). The
This year, because of continuing public health concerns resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic and the success of last year's virtual meeting, the Meeting will be held as a virtual meeting of stockholders via live webcast over the Internet. This means that you will be able to attend the Meeting, submit questions and, if you are a record holder of our shares or a proxy for a record holder, vote your shares during the Meeting via a live webcast by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FDS2021 and entering your 16-digit control number. The Proxy Statement was made available to FactSet’sour stockholders on or about October 30, 2018.29, 2021. The specific proposals to be considered and acted upon at the Meeting are summarized in the accompanying Notice. Each proposal is described in more detail in this Proxy Statement.
Record Date and Share Ownership
The only outstanding voting security of FactSet is itsour common stock, $0.01 par value per share. Stockholders of record at the close of business on October 24, 2018,22, 2021 (the "Record Date"), will be entitled to vote at the Meeting on the basis of one vote for each share of FactSet common stock held. On October 24, 2018, there22, 2021, there were 38,037,295 37,642,107 shares of FactSet commoncommon stock outstanding.
Submitting and Revoking Your Proxy
If you complete and submit your proxy, the persons named as proxies will follow your instructions. If you submit a proxy card but do not fill out the voting instructions on the proxy card, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares as follows:
| 1.
| To elect three directors to the Board of Directors.
|
| 2.
| To ratify the appointment of the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP as FactSet’s independent registered accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2019.
|
| 3.
| To approve, by non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.
|
1.To elect three directors to the Board of Directors;
2.To ratify the appointment of the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2022;
3.To approve, by non-binding vote, the compensation of our named executive officers; and
4.To vote against a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting.
In addition, if other matters are properly presented for voting at the Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
FactSet hasWe have not received notice of other matters that may be properly presented for vote at the Meeting. Your stockholder vote is important. Stockholders of record may vote their proxies by Internet, telephone or mail. Stockholders who execute proxies may revoke them at any time before they are exercised by written notice to the Secretary of the Company at or prior to the Meeting by timely delivery of a valid, later-dated proxy or by voting by ballot at the Meeting.
TheWe will bear the cost of the solicitation of
proxies will be borne by FactSet.proxies.
2021 Proxy Statement 1
Expenses of Solicitation
FactSet
We will bear the entire cost of preparing, printing and mailing this Notice and Proxy Statement, itsthe proxy card, the Company’s 2018our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) and any additional solicitation material that FactSetwe may provide to stockholders, which is estimated to be approximately $200,000.$225,000. The solicitation of proxies will be conducted primarily by mail, but may also include internet,Internet, telephone, facsimile or oral communications by directors, officers or regular employees of the Company acting without special compensation. We have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist in the solicitation of proxies for the Meeting. We will pay Innisfree a fee of $20,000 and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for its services. We also reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions.
If you have any questions or wish to receive additional copies of our 2021 Proxy Statement or Annual Report, please contact our Investor Relations Department at 1-203-810-1000 or through the website at https://investor.factset.com. We can also receive correspondence through the mail at 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk, CT 06850.
In addition, if you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares, you may contact our proxy solicitor:
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th floor
New York, New York 10022
Stockholders may call toll free: (877) 750-8310
Banks and Brokers may call collect: (212) 750-5833
Availability of FactSet’s Fiscal 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K
We will mail, upon written request, and without charge, a copy of our Fiscal 2021 Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements, schedule and list of exhibits. Requests should be sent to: FactSet Research Systems Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk, CT 06850. Our Annual Report is also available at https://investor.factset.com.
Householding
If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record and share a single address and same last name with another stockholder, you may have received notice that only one Proxy Statement and Annual Report will be sent to your address unless you instructed the holder of record to the contrary. This practice, known as
“householding”,“householding," reduces multiple mailings to your household,
reduces our printing and postage costs, and also reduces the
Company’s printing and postage costs.environmental impact of the Meeting. If you
have any questions or wish to
receive additional copies of FactSet’s 2018 Proxy Statementrevoke your consent to "householding" for future mailings, you may contact Broadridge via phone at 1-866-540-7095 or
Annual Report, please contact the Company’s Investor Relationsvia mail at Broadridge Householding Department,
at 1-203-810-1000. The mailing address is 601 Merritt 7, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851 and its website address is https://investor.factset.com.Availability of FactSet’s Fiscal 2018Annual Report on Form 10-K
FactSet will mail, upon written request and without charge, a copy of the Fiscal 2018 Annual Report, including the consolidated financial statements, schedule and list of exhibits. Requests should be sent to: FactSet Research Systems Inc., 601 Merritt 7, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851, Attn: Investor Relations. The Company’s Annual Report is also available at https://investor.factset.com.
51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
Why am I receiving these proxy materials?
The
Our Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) is asking for your proxy for use at the Meeting, to be held at its corporate headquarters at 601 Merritt 7 Norwalk, Connecticut 06851virtually, on Tuesday,Thursday, December 18, 201816, 2021, at 3:00 p.m.PM (Eastern Time), and at any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting.Meeting. As a stockholder, you are invited to attend the Meetingvia live webcast over the Internet and are entitled to and requested to vote on the items of business described in this Proxy Statement.
A proxy is another person you authorize to vote on your behalf.
FactSet asksWe ask our stockholders to instruct the proxy how to vote so that all
shares of common
sharesstock may be voted at the Meeting even if the holders do not attend the Meeting.
2 2021 Proxy Statement
Who is soliciting my vote?
The Board
of Directors of the Company is soliciting your vote.
When were the enclosed solicitation materials first given to stockholders?FactSet is
We are initially mailing to stockholders the Proxy Statement, proxy card and Notice to our stockholders on November 5, 2018.or about
October 29, 2021.
What is the purpose of the Meeting?
The Meeting will be held for the following purposes:
| ●
| To elect three directors to the Board of Directors;
|
| ●
| To ratify the appointment of the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP as FactSet’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2019; and
|
| ●
| To vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.
|
•To elect three directors to the Board of Directors;
•To ratify the appointment of the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2022;
•To vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers; and
•To vote on a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting.
What are the Board of Director’s recommendations?
FactSet’s
Our Board
of Directors recommends that you vote:
| ●
| FOR the election of each director nominee named in this Proxy Statement (Proposal 1);
|
| ●
| FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as FactSet’s independent registered accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2019 (Proposal 2); and
|
| ●
| FOR the approval, on a non-binding basis, of the compensation awarded to the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 3);
|
•FOR the election of each director nominee named in this Proxy Statement (Proposal 1);
•FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2022 (Proposal 2);
•FOR the approval of a non-binding advisory resolution regarding the compensation awarded to our named executive officers (Proposal 3); and
•AGAINST the stockholder proposal (Proposal 4).
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or Meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or Meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing,
c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
For stockholders whose shares are registered in their own names, as an alternative to voting in person at the Meeting, you may vote via the Internet, by telephone, or for those stockholders who receive a paper proxy card in the mail, by mailing a completed proxy card. For those stockholders who receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, itthe Notice provides information on how to access your proxy card, which contains instructions on how to vote via the Internet or by telephone. For those stockholders who receive a paper proxy card, instructions for voting via the Internet or by telephone are set forth on the proxy card. Those stockholders who receive a paper proxy card and voting instructions by mail, and who elect to vote by mail, should sign and return the mailed proxy card in the prepaid and addressed envelope that was enclosed with the proxy materials, and your shares will be voted at the Meeting in the manner you direct. If your proxy card is properly completed and received, and if it is not revoked, before
2021 Proxy Statement 3
the Meeting, your shares will be voted at the Meeting according to the instructions indicated on your proxy card. In the event that you return a signed proxy card on which no directions are specified, your shares will be voted
•FOR the election of each director nominee named in this Proxy Statement (Proposal 1);
•FOR the ratification of the director nominees listed (Proposal 1), FOR the ratificationappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as FactSet’sour independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2019 (Proposal 2), and 2022 (Proposal 2);
•FOR the approval onof a non-binding basis, ofadvisory resolution regarding the compensation awarded to the Company’sour named executive officers (Proposal 3)3); and
.
•AGAINST the stockholder proposal (Proposal 4).
To
the Company’sour knowledge, no other matters will be presented at the Meeting. However, if any other matters of business are properly presented, the proxy holders named on the proxy card are authorized to vote the shares represented by proxies according to their judgment.
If your shares are held in a brokerage account, you should receive instructions from your record holder that must be followed in order for your record holder to vote your shares per your instructions. Many banks and brokerage firms have a process for their beneficial holders to provide instructions via the Internet or over the telephone. If Internet or telephone voting is unavailable from your bank or brokerage firm, please complete and return the enclosed voting instruction card. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and you do not give instructions as to how to vote, your broker may have authority to vote your shares on certain discretionary items, but not other, non-discretionary items, as determined by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Proposal 1 (election of directors) and , Proposal 3 (approval of compensation), and Proposal 4 (stockholder proposal) are considered non-discretionary items and thus brokers are not permitted to vote your shares in these matters unless you provide instructions to your broker on how to vote your shares. In other words, if you have not given your broker voting instructions, your broker will not be able to vote your shares with respect to any matter other than ratification of the appointment of Proposal 2 (FactSet’s (FactSet independent registered public accounting firm).
How many votes does it take to pass each matter?
If a quorum is present at the
meeting,Meeting, the approval of each proposal requires the number of votes described below:
| ●
| Under FactSet’s amended by-laws, the nominees for election as directors of the Company are elected by majority vote, meaning that in an uncontested director election when the number of votes cast “for”a director exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that director, the nominee will be elected as a director. If a director does not receive a majority vote in an uncontested election, the director shall not be elected and shall submit his or her offer of resignation for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee within 90 days from the date of the election. That committee will then consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances and recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to such offer of resignation and in determining whether to accept such offer. An incumbent director who does not receive a majority vote will continue to serve as a director until the earlier of 1) a period of 90 days from the date of the election, 2) the date upon which the Board of Directors appoints an individual to fill the office held by that director, or 3) the date of that director’s resignation.
|
| ●
| The ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019, requires that a majority of the votes cast at the Meeting (either in person or by proxy) be voted “for” this proposal.
|
| ●
| The approval of a resolution approving the compensation of FactSet’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement is an advisory vote. However, the Company values the opinions of its stockholders and will take into account the outcome of this vote in considering future compensation arrangements.
|
•Under FactSet’s by-laws, the nominees for election as directors are elected by majority vote, meaning that in an uncontested director election when the number of votes cast “for”a director exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that director, the nominee will be elected as a director. If a director does not receive a majority vote in an uncontested election, the director shall not be elected and shall submit his or her offer of resignation for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board within 90 days from the date of the election. That committee will then consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances and recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to such offer of resignation and in determining whether to accept such offer. An incumbent director who does not receive a majority vote will continue to serve as a director until the earlier of (1) a period of 90 days from the date of the election, (2) the date upon which the Board appoints an individual to fill the office held by that director, or (3) the date of that director’s resignation.
•The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2022, requires that a majority of the votes cast at the Meeting (either in person or by proxy) be voted “for” this proposal.
•The approval of a resolution regarding the compensation awarded to our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement is a non-binding advisory vote; however, we value the opinions of our stockholders and will take into account the outcome of this vote in considering future compensation arrangements.
•The approval of the shareholder proposal requires that a majority of the votes cast at the Meeting (either in person or by proxy) be voted “for” this proposal.
4 2021 Proxy Statement
Who is entitled to vote at the Meeting and how many votes do they have?
Only holders of record of FactSet common stock at the close of business on October
24, 2018, will be22, 2021, are entitled to vote at the Meeting. Each share has one vote.
Who can attend the Meeting?
All stockholders as of October
24, 2018,22, 2021, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Meeting. In order to
be admitted toattend the Meeting, a stockholder must own
CompanyFactSet stock on the Record Date. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank, custodian, nominee or other record holder (“street name”), you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record (that is, your broker, bank, custodian, or nominee) to be able to vote at the Meeting.
What is a quorum of stockholders?
If a majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote on the Record Date are present, either in person or by proxy,
the Companywe will have a quorum at the Meeting. Any shares represented by proxies that are marked for, against, withhold, or abstain from voting on a proposal will be counted as present in determining whether there is a quorum. If a broker, bank, custodian, nominee, or other record holder of
the Company’sFactSet common stock indicates on a proxy card that it does not have discretionary authority to vote certain shares on a particular matter, and if it has not received instructions from the beneficial owners of such shares as to how to vote on such matters, the shares held by that record holder will not be voted on such matter (referred to as “broker non-votes”) but will be counted as present for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. Since there were
38,037,29537,642,107 shares of common stock outstanding on October
24, 2018,22, 2021, the presence of holders of
19,018,64818,821,054 shares is a quorum.
FactSetWe must have a quorum to conduct the Meeting.
Vote Tabulation
The appointed inspector of elections from Computershare will tabulate votes cast by proxy or in person at the Meeting. If you abstain from voting on any or all proposals you will be included in the number of stockholders present at the Meeting for the purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.
What are broker non-votes?
If you hold shares beneficially in street name and do not provide your broker with voting instructions, your shares may constitute broker non-votes. Broker non-votes occur on a matter when a broker is not permitted to vote on that matter without instructions from the beneficial owner and instructions are not given. These matters are referred to as non-discretionary matters.
How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?
Abstentions and broker non-votes count for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes have no effect on the determination of whether a nominee or any of the proposals have received the vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented by proxy and voting at the Meeting. However, abstentions and broker non-votes could prevent the approval of a proposal where the number of affirmative votes, though a majority of the votes represented and cast, does not constitute a majority of the required quorum.
What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card or instruction form?
If you receive more than one proxy card or instruction form, it means that you have multiple accounts with FactSet’sour transfer agent and/or a broker or other nominee or fiduciary or you may hold your shares in different ways or in multiple names (e.g., joint tenancy, trusts, and custodial accounts). Please vote all your shares.How
How do I revoke my proxy and change my vote prior to the Meeting?
If you submit the enclosed proxy card by voting using the mail, Internet or telephone procedures, you may change your vote before the Meeting. You may change your vote in one of fourthree ways: (1) you may deliver a written notice prior to the Meeting, dated later than the proxy you want to revoke, stating that the earlier proxy is revoked, to the Secretary of FactSet Research Systems Inc., Rachel R. Stern, 601 Merritt 7,at 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851, a written notice dated later than the proxy you want to revoke, stating that the proxy is revoked,CT 06850, (2) you may complete and send in another proxy card with a later date using the mail, Internet or telephone procedures, subject to the voting deadlines set forth on the proxy card, or (3) you may attend the Meeting and vote in person.vote. For shares you hold beneficially or in street name, you may change your vote by submitting a later dated
2021 Proxy Statement 5
voting instruction form to your broker or other nominee or fiduciary in accordance with its procedures, or if you obtained a legal proxy form giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the Meeting and
voting in person.voting.
Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set ofprinted proxy materials?
Pursuant to the notice and access rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Company iswe are making this Proxy Statement and itsour Annual Report available to itsour stockholders over the Internet. As a result, unless you have previously requested electronic access to FactSet’sour proxy materials or the receipt of paper proxy materials, you will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and Annual Report over the Internet, how to request a printed or e-mail copy of these materials, and how to vote by Internet and mail. The CompanyWe will mail the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about November 5, 2018.October 29, 2021. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is not a proxy card and cannot be used to vote your shares.
In addition, if you are voting online, you will be prompted to consent to receiving proxy materials electronically in future years. Choosing to receive your future proxy materials electronically will save
the Companyus the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the impact of
itsthe annual meetings on the environment.
To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. If you choose to receive future proxy materials electronically, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials electronically will remain in effect until you terminate it.
What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?
Most
FactSetof our stockholders hold their shares as
a beneficial
ownerowners through a broker or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’sour transfer agent, Computershare Shareowner Services, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and we sent the Notice was sent directly to you by FactSet.you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to FactSet or to vote in person at the Meeting. If you requested to receive printed proxy materials, FactSet haswe have enclosed or sent a proxy card for you to use. You may also vote on the Internet or by telephone.
Beneficial Owner
If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, trust, or other similar organization, like the vast majority of the Company’sour stockholders, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and the Notice was forwarded to you by that organization. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee, or nominee how to vote your shares, and you are also invited to attend the Meeting. Since aShares for which you are the beneficial owner is notmay be voted electronically during the stockholderMeeting.
6 2021 Proxy Statement
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Qualifications and Diversity
We seek directors with diverse and solid experience in areas relevant to our business who are committed to a culture of record, youopen and inclusive communication on the Board and with management. Our directors must demonstrate strength of character, independent thought, sound judgment, integrity, professionalism, leadership, meaningful accomplishments, and business knowledge. Our directors must be committed to representing the long-term interests of FactSet’s stockholders and other stakeholders. Directors must demonstrate the ability to provide practical insights, be willing to dedicate sufficient time and energy to effectively carry out their duties (particularly considering the number of boards on which they may not vote your sharesserve) and understand and accept the fiduciary responsibilities required of Board members. We believe that each member of the Board, including each nominee for the Board, possesses the key attributes we look for in person unless you obtain a “legal proxy” fromdirector, including strong and effective decision making, communication and leadership skills.
We seek to maintain a balance of perspectives, qualifications, qualities and skills on the
broker, bank, trustee or nomineeBoard, including consideration of factors such as, among other items, specific business and financial expertise desired on the Board, experience as a director of a public company, geography, age, gender, race, national origin and other diversity and inclusion factors. We believe that
holds your shares giving youthe Board members continuing after the Meeting, as a whole, possess the right
diversity of background, experiences, qualifications and skills to
voteoversee and address the
shares at the Meeting.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
key issues facing FactSet.
2021 Proxy Statement 7
Board Leadership Structure
The Board believes that the Company’s stockholders are best served if the Board retains the flexibility to adapt its leadership structure to applicable facts and circumstances, which necessarily change over time. Accordingly, the Company’s
FactSet's Corporate Governance Guidelines
provide thatrequire the
Board may combine or separateseparation of the roles of the
ChairmanChair and the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"). The Board feels that this structure is in the best interest of our stockholders, as it permits our CEO to focus on the management of our day-to-day operations, while the Chair can focus on developing agendas that ensure that the Board’s time and attention are focused on the most critical matters. The Board believes this leadership structure strikes an effective balance between management and independent director participation in the Board process and provides independent leadership of the Board
of Directors (“Chairman”)that assists in the Board's oversight responsibilities and
Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), as it deems advisable. Philip A. Hadley has served as Chairman since his unanimous appointment on September 5, 2000. Mr. Hadley stepped down from his role asincreases CEO
of FactSet on July 1, 2015 but continues to be an employee of the Company through November 1, 2018.accountability.
F. Philip Snow assumed the role of CEO on July 1, 2015, having been an employee of FactSet since 1996. The Board believes Mr. Snow’s leadership acumen combines a deep knowledge of FactSetour clients, a commitment to itsour employees and a vision for the Company’sour continued growth.
Robin A. Abrams, one of our independent directors, has served as our Board Chair since June 23, 2020. Ms. Abrams responsibilities as Board Chair include, among other things:
•Calling and presiding over all meetings of the Board and executive sessions of our independent directors.
•Discussing and establishing with the CEO the agenda for Board meetings and information to be provided to the Board.
•Reviewing the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from management to the Board so that the Board can operate effectively and responsibly perform its duties.
•Serving as a liaison between the Board and management, including holding regular update sessions with the CEO.
•Presiding over meetings of our stockholders.
•Being a point of contact for communications with our stockholders and other external stakeholders.
8 2021 Proxy Statement
The Board has determinedChair also performs such other duties as the Board may from time to time delegate to the Chair to assist the Board in the fulfillment of its responsibilities.
FactSet's Corporate Governance Guidelines allow the Board the option to designate an independent Board member to serve as Lead Independent Director, although there is no requirement that this position be filled at all times. James J. McGonigle, Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has served as our Lead Independent Director since September 2005.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews the Board's leadership structure
under whichand, when appropriate, recommends changes to the
rolesBoard's leadership structure, taking into consideration the needs of
Chairmanthe Board and FactSet at such time. In September 2020, the Board revised our Corporate Governance Guidelines to require the separation of the Chair and CEO
areroles, where previously the Board had the option to combine or separate
is currently in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders. This structure permits Mr. Snow to focus on the management of the Company’s day-to-day operations, while continuing to benefit from the knowledge and experience of Mr. Hadley. Meanwhile, Mr. Hadley, as Chairman, focuses on developing agendas that ensure that the Board’s time and attention are focused on the most critical matters.such roles.
Each of the directors other than Mr. Hadley and Mr. Snow areis independent, and the Board believes that the independent directors provide effective oversight of management.
The Board appointed James J.Ms. Abrams, an independent director, as Chair on June 23, 2020. Mr. McGonigle, an independent director, has served as the Company’s Lead Independent Director. Mr. McGonigle has served inDirector since September 2005.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the separation of the Chair and CEO roles and allow the Board the option to designate an independent Board member to serve as the Lead Independent Director, although there is no requirement that this position since September 2005. be filled at all times.
As Lead Independent Director, Mr. McGonigle’s responsibilities include:
| ●
| Coordinating and moderating executive sessions of the Board’s independent directors.
|
| ●
| Advising the Chairman as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from management that is necessary for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties.
|
| ●
| Holding regular update sessions with both the CEO and the Chairman.
|
| ●
| Acting as the principal liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman on sensitive issues.
|
| ●
| Performing such other duties as the Board may from time to time delegate to the Lead Independent Director to assist the Board in the fulfillment of its responsibilities.
|
•Holding regular update sessions with the Chair and other Board members, as appropriate.
•Advising the Chair as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from management that is necessary for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties.
•Leading the annual Board evaluation process, in close consultation with the Chair and other directors, as appropriate.
•If the Chair is unavailable to do so, coordinating and moderating executive sessions of the Board’s independent directors and performing such other functions as may be necessary.
•Performing such other duties as the Board may from time to time delegate to the Lead Independent Director to assist the Board in the fulfillment of its responsibilities.
The independent directors, who constitute
seveneight of the nine
current Board members,
andmust be a majority of the directors of the
Company,Company. The independent directors meet at least four times annually, after the end of each scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board. On October
23, 2018,21, 2021, the
Company’s Board reviewed the independence of
itsour directors under the applicable standards of the NYSE and the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”). The Board determined that each director, other than
Messrs. Hadley andMr. Snow, qualifies as “independent” in accordance with those published listing requirements.
Declassification of the Board of Directors
Currently, our By-laws provide that FactSet’s directors are divided into three classes, with the directors in each class serving three-year terms and the term of one class expiring at each annual meeting. As part of our regular review and consideration of our corporate governance practices, and taking into account conversations with, and statements of, certain of our stockholders, the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of FactSet and our stockholders to present a proposal to our stockholders to declassify the Board. We intend to present a Board-sponsored proposal at our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to amend our certificate of incorporation to transition to a declassified Board beginning with our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This would result in the entire Board of Directors being elected annually for one-year terms beginning at our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
2021 Proxy Statement 9 Business
Business Experience and
QualificationsQualifications of Board Members The following discussion presents information about the persons who comprise FactSet’s Board of Directors, including the three nominees for election.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Robin A. Abrams |
| |
| | |
| Committees: | Chair of the Board of Directors
Audit Committee (Member) |
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Member) |
| |
| Term: | Current term expires in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 20202023 |
| |
Director Since:Since: | 2011 |
Ms. Abrams, age
67,70, is a financial consultant who currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of: HCL Technologies Ltd., a global offshore IT and software development company; Sierra Wireless, Inc., a leader in the design and delivery of customized connected lifestyle devices and services; and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, a global leader in smart connectivity solutions.
She also serves on the Board of Directors of the privately held company Zephyr Sleep Technologies of Canada, a developer of sleep technology. In addition, Ms. Abrams
servesserved on the board of trustees for the Anita Borg Institute for Women and
Technology.Technology through 2018. From August 2006 to January 2007, Ms. Abrams served as Interim CEO of ZILOG, Inc., a provider of integrated microcontroller products, where she also served as a director from 2004 to 2010. From July 2004 to July 2006, she served as CEO of Firefly Communications, Inc., a company with a range of mobile products that address the youth market. She received her B.A. in political science and history and her J.D. from the University of Nebraska.
Ms. Abrams brings
to the Board a wealth of experience at technology companies, which FactSet seeks to leverage to enhance its own development processes. She has seen how several highly successful technology companies stay ahead of their competition through properly planning their product development strategies. Her previous experiences as an executive officer at several technology companies makes Ms. Abrams an important resource for the Board as it assesses financial and strategic decisions.
| Scott A. Billeadeau | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Siew Kai Choy | |
| | |
| Committees: | Audit Committee (Chair)(Member) |
| |
| Term: | Nominated for a three-yearthree year term, which would expire in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 20212024 |
| |
Director Since:Since: | 20012020 |
Mr.
Billeadeau,Choy, age
57, is a Partner55, has over 30 years of
Walrus Partners LLC, and Lead portfolio managerexperience in the investment management industry, retiring from Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, GIC Private Limited, after 20 years of
the firm’s Micro-cap Special Situations (S2) strategy. Mr. Billeadeauservice. He was a Managing Director of
Small-capGIC and
Mid-cap Growth Strategies at Fifth Third Assetheld key leadership positions in the Equities investment department, Risk & Performance Management,
(“Fifth Third”). Prior to working at Fifth Third, heenterprise Data & Analytics, Governance and GIC Innovation Labs. He was
a Principal, Founder and Senior Portfolio Manager with Paladin Investment Associates, LLC (“Paladin”) between March 2003 and October 2012, where he spent eight years managing over $2 billion in small-cap and mid-cap assets for Bank of America and Nations Bank. Mr. Billeadeau received a B.A. in Economics from Princeton University and has earned the right to use the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and isalso a member of the
CFA Institute.Corporate Management Committee and Group Risk Committee. From 2015, he led the establishment of an Enterprise Data and Analytics capability in GIC, with responsibility for building corporate wide capabilities for investment AI/Data Science, Enterprise Data Governance and Data Architecture, as well as Business Requirements Analysis, Data Management and Operations functions related to solutioning systems and processes supporting investment decision-making by GIC investment groups (across Equities, Fixed Income, Treasury/FX, Private Equities, Real Estate, Private Debt, Infrastructure and Total Portfolio). In his earlier career, Mr. Billeadeau providesChoy had the start-up experience of building from scratch all functions of a boutique fund management company and leading change initiatives in one of the largest South East Asian banks. He is an independent investor and/or advisor to listed and private companies across Banking, Fintech, Regtech and DeepTech located in Singapore, the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe. Mr. Choy recently served as a Distinguished Careers Institute Fellow at Stanford University. Mr. Choy holds a BSc in Computer Science and Management Science (joint honours) and has attended The Wharton School’s Advanced Management Program for Senior Executives.
Mr. Choy brings to the Board
expertise in corporate finance, accounting and strategy, including experience gained asthe perspective of a
Managing Director of Fifth Third, a public company, and Paladin. Through this experience, he has developed expertise in several valued areas including strategic development, business development and finance. Mr. Billeadeau also brings a background in organizational leadership and management, and experience serving as a director for privately held companies. His involvement in the financial industry has provided him experience aslarge institutional investor, along with an
outside board member and audit committee member. Mr. Billeadeau serves as the Financial Expertin-depth understanding of the
Audit Committee.client experience from his time with GIC. He also provides the Board with deep familiarity with the global finance industry, understanding of the evolution of our products, and insights into the Asia Pacific region. 10 2021 Proxy Statement
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Malcolm Frank |
| |
| | |
| Committees: | Compensation and Talent Committee (Member) |
| Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Member) |
| |
| Term: | Current term expires in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 20202023 |
| |
Director Since:Since: | 2016 |
Mr. Frank, age 52, currently serves55, was the former President of Cognizant Digital Business and Technology Solutions Corp. and retired as of September 1, 2021. In this role, Mr. Frank oversaw Cognizant's broad digital services portfolio. This portfolio included Digital Strategy, Artificial Intelligence & Analytics, Interactive, Digital Engineering, and loT. Prior to this role, Mr. Frank was Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and Chief Marketing Officer at Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (“Cognizant”), a provider of custom information technology, consulting and business process outsourcing services.Cognizant. Prior to joining Cognizant in 2005, he was co-founder, President and CEO of CXO systems, an independent software vendor providing dashboard solutions for senior managers. In addition, he was the founder, President, CEO and chairman of Nervewire Inc., a leading management consulting and systems integration firm. Prior to founding Nervewire, vendor.
Mr. Frank
was a co-founder, executive officerhas co-authored two best-selling books, "What to Do When Machines Do Everything" (2017) and
Senior Vice President"Code Halos" (2014), both of which received multiple international book awards. Mr. Frank has also authored numerous white papers focusing on the Future of Work and created the term "SMAC Stack." Mr. Frank has presented at
Cambridge Technology Partners, where he ran Worldwide Marketing, Business Developmentvarious conclaves, including the World Economic Forum and
several business units.the South by Southwest Conference and Festivals. Mr. Frank is
frequently quoted, is the subject of a
graduateHarvard Business School case study, and was named "one of
Yale University with a degreethe most influential people in
Economics.finance" by Risk Management Magazine. Mr. Frank provides to the Board more than two decades of experience in the information technology industry as well as expertise in corporate strategy and marketing. Mr. Frank is a recognized industry thought leader and is a frequent speaker on key issues of IT management. In addition, Mr. Frank is also serves on the Board of Directors of the U.S. IndiaUS-India Strategic Partnership Forum.
| Philip A. Hadley |
| |
Committees: | Chairman of the Board of Directors |
| |
Term: | Nominated for a three-year term, which would expire in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2021 |
| |
Director Since: | 2000 |
Forum (USISPF) and EqualAI, a nonprofit organization focused on reducing unconscious bias in the development and use of artificial intelligence. Mr. Hadley, age 56, served as FactSet’s CEOFrank holds a Bachelor's degree in Economics from 2000 until stepping down on July 1, 2015. He remains an employee of the Company, serving in a senior advisory role to management through November 1, 2018. He joined FactSet in 1985 as a consultant and was the Company’s Vice President, Sales from 1986 to 1989, and Senior Vice President and Director of Sales and Marketing from 1989 to 2000. Prior to joining the Company, Yale University.
Mr.
Hadley was employed by Cargill Corporation. He currently serves as a member of the board of advisors of RS Energy Group and another private company. Mr. Hadley received a B.B.A. in Accounting from the University of Iowa, has earned the right to use the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and is a member of the CFA Institute.As Chairman and former CEO, Mr. HadleyFrank brings to the Board his thorough knowledgeexpertise in marketing and strategy, as well as his many years of FactSet’s business, strategy, people, operations, competitionexperience in the areas of technical professional services and financial position. He provides recognized executive leadership and vision. In addition, Mr. Hadley brings with himsoftware as a global network of client and industry relationships.
service ("SaaS"). | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Sheila B. Jordan | |
| | |
| Committees: | Audit Committee (Member) |
| |
| Term: | Current term expires in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 20192022 |
| |
Director Since:Since: | 2016 |
Ms. Jordan, age 54,57, is Chief Digital Technology Officer for Honeywell. In this role, she is responsible for driving digital technology transformation across the company. She has broad oversight and responsibility for IT infrastructure and services, as well as expansion of software development in support of Honeywell’s digital initiatives, go-to-market offerings, and the solution needs of its customers. Before Honeywell, Ms. Jordan was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer at Symantec, a global cybersecurity company. Ms. Jordan iscompany, where she was responsible for driving Symantec's information technologyIT strategy and operations, ensuring that the company has the right talent, stays ahead of technology trends and maximizes the value of technology investments.operations. Prior to joining Symantec,that, Ms. Jordan served as Senior Vice President of Communication and Collaboration IT for nine years at Cisco Systems where she was responsibleSystems. She has also worked for collaboration platforms, user experience and support, communications and mobility services. Earlier in her career Ms. Jordan worked at Walt Disney World, in Orlando, Florida, where she washeld the position of Senior Vice President for Destination DisneyDisney.
Ms. Jordan is the recipient of multiple industry awards and
Vice Presidentrecognitions including a 2019 Women of
MarketingInfluence Award from Silicon Valley Business Journal. She was recognized as one of the Top 25 Women Leaders in Cybersecurity in 2019 by The Software Report and
Sales Finance.one of the Top 100 Women in Technology by Technology Magazine in 2021. Ms. Jordan holds a B.A. in accounting from the University of Central Florida and an M.B.A. from Florida Institute of Technology.
She is the author of the book "You Are NOT Ruining Your Kids: A Positive Perspective on the Working Mom." Ms. Jordan brings to the Board extensive expertise in strategy, information technology and driving enterprise collaboration across multiple channels including various mobile platforms. During her career, Ms. Jordan has been recognized with numerous industry affiliations awards including Top 10 women CIO’s changing the global through tech (2018), CIO of the Year for Innovation and Transformation (June 2015), Transformational CIO (2015) and 100 Leaders in STEM (2015).
2021 Proxy Statement 11
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | James J. McGonigle | |
| | |
| Committees: | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair) |
| |
| Term: | Current term expires in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 20192022 |
| |
Director Since:Since: | 2002 |
Mr. McGonigle, age
55,58, currently serves as an Entrepreneur Advisor at Summit Partners and Equality Asset Management, and as an angel investor and advisor to a variety of small companies in the business services and software industries. He has been
ona member of FactSet’s Board of Directors since 2002, and has served as the Lead Independent Director since 2005 and as the
ChairmanChair of the Nominating and Governance Committee since 2004. Mr. McGonigle is the former Chairman and CEO of The Corporate Executive Board Company (“CEB”). During his tenure at CEB he held a variety of positions including: special advisor to the Board of Directors from July 2007 until April 2009; Director and Chairman of the Board from July 2005 until July 2007; CEO from July 1998 until July 2005; and General Manager from October 1997 until July 1998. From 1995 until October 1997, Mr. McGonigle was the General Manager of the corporate division of The Advisory Board Company. Mr. McGonigle spent his early career as a consultant at McKinsey and Co. He
had also created and taught an M.B.A. course in management consulting at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business in Washington D.C. and at Escuela Superior de Administración y Dirección de Empresas (ESADE) in Barcelona Spain. He received a B.A. from the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University in 1985 and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1990.
Mr. McGonigle brings to the Board leadership experience, including service as the CEO of a public company for over seven years. This role required industry knowledge combined with operational and management expertise. In addition, Mr. McGonigle brings to the Board market and corporate governance insights from his experience as an outside public company board member.
| Laurie Siegel | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Lee Shavel | |
| | |
| Committees: | Audit Committee (Chair) |
| Term: | Nominated for a three year term, which would expire in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2024 |
| Director Since: | 2020 |
Mr. Shavel, age 54, is Chief Financial Officer and Group President of Verisk Analytics, Inc., a global data analytics company. Mr. Shavel has been at Verisk since 2017 and is responsible as CFO for financial and strategy functions, including accounting, treasury, financial planning and analysis, investor relations, M&A, strategic sourcing and procurement, real estate, and corporate tax. In addition, as Group President, he has operating responsibility for Verisk's Energy & Specialized Markets and Financial Services businesses. Before joining Verisk, Mr. Shavel served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nasdaq, Inc., from 2011 to 2016. Before that, he served as Managing Director and Americas Head of Financial Institutions Investment Banking and in other capacities at Bank of America Merrill Lynch from 1993 to 2011. From 2016 to 2019, he served as a Board Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Investment Technology Group, Inc. Mr. Shavel graduated with honors from the University of Pennsylvania, with a B.A. in English and a B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School.
Mr. Shavel brings a chief financial officer's and business leader's perspective to the Board, including extensive familiarity with the functioning of a public company audit committee. Mr. Shavel serves as a Financial Expert on the Audit Committee. He also contributes his knowledge and experience of the financial information services industry.
12 2021 Proxy Statement
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Laurie Siegel | |
| | |
| Committees: | Compensation and Talent Committee (Chair) |
| |
| Term: | Current term expires in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 20202023 |
| |
Director Since:Since: | 2015 |
Ms. Siegel, age
62,65, is the President of LAS Advisory Services, with a background in business and human resources
consulting.leadership. She currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of
CenturyLink, Inc. (“CenturyLink”),Lumen Technologies, a global
broadband telecommunicationsenterprise technology platform, and
data hosting company; Volt Information Sciences, Inc. (“Volt”), a provider of global infrastructure solutions in technology, information services and staffing acquisition; and California Resources Corporation, an oil and natural gas exploration and production company. In addition, she serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Junior Achievement of New Jersey and the Morristown Festival of Books.Council Advisors Capital Corporation. She retired in September 2012 from Tyco International Ltd., a diversified manufacturing and service company, where she had served as Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Internal Communications since 2003. From 1994 to 2002, she held various positions with Honeywell International Inc., including Vice President of Human Resources – Specialty Materials. Ms. Siegel currently serves as an advisor to the G100 Network and chairs the G100 Talent Consortium. Ms. Siegel
served from 2018 through October 2020 as a member of the Board of Directors of California Resources Corporation, an oil and natural gas exploration and production company, where she was a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees. Ms. Siegel received an M.B.A. and a M.A. degree in City and Regional Planning, both from Harvard University. She completed her B.A. at the University of Michigan.
Ms. Siegel’s key qualifications, experiences and skills include executive experience with multi-national companies, as well as human resources and executive compensation expertise. She serves as the
Compensation Chair of
both the
CenturyLinkHR and
Volt boards. She also servesCompensation Committee at Lumen and as a member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of the
Volt board.Lumen Board. Ms. Siegel brings to FactSet’s Board substantial experience as a human resources executive with large global enterprises as well as substantial public company board experience.
| F. Philip Snow | | | | | | | | | | |
| | F. Philip Snow | |
| | |
| Committees: | Chief Executive Officer |
| |
| Term: | Current term expires in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 20192022 |
| |
Director Since:Since: | 2015 |
Mr. Snow, age
54,57, was named CEO of FactSet on July 1, 2015, having served as President since July 1, 2014. Mr. Snow joined FactSet in 1996 as a Consultant before moving to the Asia Pacific region to hold positions in the Tokyo and Sydney offices. Following his move back to the U.S. in 2000, Mr. Snow held various sales leadership roles prior to assuming the role of Senior Vice President, Director of U.S. Investment Management Sales in 2013. Mr. Snow received a B.A. in Chemistry from the University of California at Berkeley and a Master of International Management from the Thunderbird School of Global Management. He has earned the right to use the Chartered Financial Analyst designation.
The Board benefits from Mr. Snow’s many years with FactSet and his unique expertise gained by rising through the Sales organization from Consultant to Head of Americas Sales. He has also served in multiple geographic regions including Australia, Tokyo, and San Francisco before coming to the East Coast as President and then CEO. His tenure at FactSet has contributed to his strategic vision, leadership and operational expertise, and his deep knowledge of the financial information services industry.
2021 Proxy Statement 13
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Joseph R. Zimmel | |
| | |
| Committees: | Audit Committee (Member) |
|
Compensation and Talent Committee (Member) |
| |
| Term: | Nominated for a three-yearthree year term, which would expire in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 20212024 |
| |
Director Since:Since: | 2007 |
Mr. Zimmel, age
65,68, is a financial consultant and retired Managing Director of Goldman, Sachs & Co. From December 2001 until November 2002, Mr. Zimmel served as an Advisory Director to the Goldman Sachs Group. In the investment banking division at Goldman, Sachs & Co., Mr. Zimmel held the position of Managing Director of the Communications, Media & Entertainment Group for the Americas from 1999 to 2001, after acting as a Managing Director and a co-head of the group from 1992 to 1999. In addition to his appointment to FactSet’s Board, Mr. Zimmel is also a Member of the Board of Directors of
NuTravel, Synchrodyne Networks,the following private companies: APCO Worldwide
LLC, Prizmalite Industries Inc.,
Pureti,PURETi Group, LLC, and
Burbio.Burbio, Inc.
Mr. Zimmel’s background in finance and advisory roles is complemented by his knowledge of FactSet and its industry. His contributions are augmented by his experience serving as an outside director of a public company and multiple private companies. In addition, Mr. Zimmel’s employment at Goldman, Sachs & Co., including service in senior leadership positions, brings a valued perspective to the Board and to the Audit Committee.
Over the past ten years, no director or nominee has been involved in:
| ●
| Legal proceedings, such as SEC securities fraud enforcement actions against any director or nominee;
|
| ●
| Judicial or administrative proceedings resulting from involvement in mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business activity;
|
| ●
| Judicial or administrative proceedings based on violations of federal or state securities, commodities, banking or insurance laws and regulations, or any settlement to such actions; and
|
| ●
| Disciplinary sanctions or orders imposed by a stock, commodities, or exchange or other self-regulatory organization.
|
•Legal proceedings, such as SEC securities fraud enforcement actions;
•Judicial or administrative proceedings resulting from involvement in mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business activity;
•Judicial or administrative proceedings based on violations of federal or state securities, commodities, banking or insurance laws and regulations, or any settlement to such actions; or
•Disciplinary sanctions or orders imposed by a stock, commodities, or exchange or other self-regulatory organization.
The Board has adopted corporate governance guidelinesCorporate Governance Guidelines which help govern the Company. You can access these corporate governancePursuant to the guidelines, alongthe Board is mandated to act in the long-term interests of FactSet and the Board's mission is to provide guidance in order to promote our success and enhance FactSet's ultimate value, with each director serving as a sounding board for management in matters where that director's experience or expertise is pertinent. In assessing management's methods of itsoptimizing stockholder value, the Board Committee charters, atmust also take into consideration other interested stakeholders, including employees, clients and vendors. Directors should have a full understanding of our business and the Leadership & Corporate Governance page of the Company’s Investor Relations website at https://investor.factset.com or requestissues relevant to it, and on a free copy by contacting Investor Relations at FactSet Research Systems Inc., 601 Merritt 7, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851. regular basis should access our services and review new product developments. Directors are encouraged to attend continuing director education programs.
Directors owe a duty of care to the CompanyFactSet and must act on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action they take is in the best interests of FactSet. Directors are expected to attend all Board meetings and participate actively, offering their candid views and their well-informed, deliberate judgment. Directors should inform themselves using all material information reasonably available to them prior to making a business decision. Whenever a director is unable to attend a meeting, he or shethe director should contact the ChairmanBoard Chair, applicable committee Chair or Secretary promptly after the meeting to become informed on the subjects discussed, views expressed and actions taken, if any. Directors should have a full understanding of the Company’s business and the issues relevant to it. Directors are expected to be prepared to discuss matters listed on the agenda for each meeting, should review materials sent in advance of such meetings and, when appropriate, ask questions of management. The Company doesWe do not have a policy with regard to directors’ attendance at our annual stockholder meetings, but FactSet doeswe do expect
14 2021 Proxy Statement
each director to attend all Board meetings. Two directors (Mr. Snow, our CEO, and
Mr. Hadley, the Chairman of the Board)Ms. Abrams, our Board Chair) attended
the 2017our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Each director is expected to give freely and generously of the director’s time in providing the best guidance to FactSet. A director who is a member of senior management of another public company may not sit on a total of more than three public company boards. All other directors may not serve on more than four boards of public companies without the prior written approval of the Board. Each independent director is expected to participate in committees suited to the director’s skills and for the best interest of FactSet. Directors are also expected to make themselves available for non-regularly scheduled meetings as well as consultation with management on an as-needed basis.
You can access our Corporate Governance Guidelines, along with each of our Board Committee charters, at the Corporate Governance page of our Investor Relations website at https://investor.factset.com or request a free copy by contacting Investor Relations at FactSet Research Systems Inc., 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk, CT 06850.
Board Oversight of Risk
FactSet’s Board has the ultimate responsibility for overseeing our risk management governance, with a focus on the Company’s most material risks. Our Board oversees and monitors our risk management processes and evaluates whether management has reasonable controls in place to address material risks. Our management has day-to-day responsibility for identifying the various risks facing FactSet, formulating risk management policies and procedures, and managing our risk exposures. Our Board recognizes the importance of effective risk oversight in running a successful business and in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities to our stockholders. Our Board is responsible for assuring that an appropriate culture of risk management exists within FactSet and for setting the right “tone at the top.”
Our Board, together with its committees, has been actively engaged with our management team in monitoring the developments and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and our management team is in regular communication with the Board about the assessment and management of the significant risks to FactSet, our employees, our clients and our other stakeholders.
2021 Proxy Statement 15
Our Board is currently comprised of nine members, seveneight of whom are independent directors. The Company’sOur Board of Directors has the following three standing committees: (1) an Audit Committee, (2) a Compensation and Talent Committee, and (3) a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of the committees operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. All of the committee charters are available on FactSet’sthe Corporate Governance page of our Investor Relations website at https:https://investor.factset.com. The Board delegates various responsibilities and authority to the different Board Committees.committees. Committees regularly report on their activities and actions to the full Board. The Board met sevensix times during fiscal 2018,2021, four of which were regularly scheduled quarterly meetings. No one director attended fewer than 75% of the Board and committee meetings in the aggregate during fiscal 2018.2021.
The following table identifies the Board committee members as of October 30, 2018:29, 2021:
| Committee Name
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Independent Directors
| Audit
| | Compensation
and Talent
| | Nominating and
Corporate Governance
Committee Name |
Independent Directors | Audit | | Compensation and Talent | | Nominating and Corporate Governance |
|
Robin A. Abrams(1) | Member | | | | Member |
Scott A. Billeadeau(1)
Siew Kai Choy | Chair
Member | | | | |
MalcolmFrank | | | Member | | Member |
Sheila B. Jordan | Member | | | | |
James J. McGonigle(2) | | | | | Chair |
Laurie Siegel
Lee Shavel(3) | Chair | | Chair
| | |
Laurie Siegel | | | Chair | | |
| Joseph R. Zimmel | Member | | Member | | |
| (2)
| Lead Independent Director
|
(1) Independent Board Chair
(2) Lead Independent Director
(3) Financial Expert
The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight review of
FactSet’sour internal and external financial reporting processes. Its primary responsibilities include: meeting with financial management and the independent auditors to review
FactSet’sour system of internal controls; assessing the quality of
FactSet’sour accounting principles and financial reporting; reviewing the external audit process as conducted by
FactSet'sour independent auditors; reviewing the financial information provided to
our stockholders and other external parties; and preparing the report of the Audit Committee included in the Proxy Statement on a yearly basis. The Board has determined that Mr.
BilleadeauShavel qualifies as
thean “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Board has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NYSE and NASDAQ and has sufficient knowledge in reading and understanding the Company’s financial statements to serve on the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee
is also responsible for oversight of our enterprise risk management and specifically considers risks and controls relating to, among other things, data and cybersecurity and our financial statements and financial reporting processes. The Audit Committee met
sevenfive times during fiscal
2018.2021.
Under the Audit and Non-Audit Service Pre-Approval Policy adopted by the Audit Committee, all audit and non-audit services to be performed
for us by the independent registered public accounting firm
for the Company require pre-approval by the Audit Committee. In some cases, pre-approval relates to audit or non-audit services that fall within certain established
buckets,parameters, and in other cases a particular defined task or scope of work may be pre-approved subject to a specific budget. Pre-approvals may be granted by either the full Audit Committee or the Chair of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may not delegate pre-approval authority to management.
16 2021 Proxy Statement
Compensation and Talent Committee
The primary responsibilitiesresponsibility of the Compensation and Talent Committee areis to review matters related to talent and approvecompensation for FactSet generally, including assisting in all matters relating to recruiting, hiring, retaining and compensating our directors, officers and employees. The Compensation and Talent Committee defines and approves an overall compensation philosophy and strategy for FactSet and its executive officers and employees and periodically reviews how our compensation programs implement this compensation philosophy and affect our employees.
The Compensation and Talent Committee assists the Board in developing and evaluating potential candidates for executive positions with FactSet, including the CEO position, and oversees the development of executive succession plans. The Compensation and Talent Committee regularly reviews FactSet's human capital management, cultural environment, and diversity, equity and inclusion practices.
The Compensation and Talent Committee reviews and approves the compensation policies for theour CEO, named executive officers (NEOs)("NEOs") and other direct reports to the CEO, of the Company, oversee the Company’soversees administration of itsour equity-based compensation policies, approve grants of share-basedequity-based awards to our officers and employees of the Company under its optionour equity plans (individually orand in the aggregate), and reviewreviews annual performance goals for the Company’sour principal executive officers in conjunction with assessing the quality of the performance of those executive officers.
The Compensation and Talent Committee
also assists in all matters relating to recruiting, hiring, and retaining the Company’s directors, officers and employees.met seven times during fiscal 2021. During fiscal
20182021, the Compensation and
2017, FactSet managementTalent Committee retained
Korn Ferry Hay Group, Inc.Farient Advisors, LLC ("Farient") for compensation consulting
services. These services,
which included executive compensation
structure design, executive search services, and
assistance with compensation proxy statement disclosures. The consultantgovernance plan design. Farient did not provide services with respect to the individual compensation amounts to be paid to individual executives.
During this period, FactSet paid
the consultant $215,000$115,000 to Farient for
executive compensation structure design and for all other consulting services
$716,726. Theprovided to the Compensation and Talent Committee
met nine times during fiscal
2018.2021.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No person who served as a member of the Compensation and Talent Committee during the last fiscal year is a former or current officer or employee of FactSet or any of its subsidiaries. No executive officer of FactSet served or serves on the compensation committee or board of any company that employed or employs any member of the FactSet Compensation and Talent Committee or Board. Accordingly, there are no relationships required to be disclosed under this caption under the rules of the SEC.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the qualifications of candidates for nomination as directors and makes recommendations to the Board regarding prospective nominees to the Board, issues recommendations to the Board regarding corporate governance issuesBoard. The Nominating and as appropriate, assists in succession planning for senior management of FactSet. TheCorporate Governance Committee also develops and recommends to the Board for its approval an annual evaluation process of the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. committees and oversees the annual evaluations.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual evaluations. Board's efforts to maintain high standards of corporate governance, issues recommendations to the Board regarding corporate governance issues, and oversees risks related to our governance structure. It also oversees our position on corporate social responsibility and public issues of significance that affect our key stakeholders, including reviewing the impact of our business operations, procedures and processes on our employees, stockholders, citizens and communities. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also assists in succession planning and recruitment for our senior management, including the CEO.
The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent under the listing standards of the NYSE and NASDAQ. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met
oncefour times during fiscal
2018.2021.
2021 Proxy Statement 17
Corporate Sustainability
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Efforts
Inclusion is one of FactSet's core values. We recognize that our best ideas can come from anyone, anywhere, at any time, and help us provide the best solutions for our clients around the globe. We continually seek to expand our workforce with diverse perspectives, backgrounds, and experiences. By fostering a globally inclusive culture, we enable our people to be themselves at work and to join in, be heard, contribute, and grow. Together, we work to recruit, advance, and engage talent with an inclusive culture unified by the FactSet spirit of going above and beyond.
During our 2021 fiscal year, we refreshed our Diversity, Equity and Inclusion ("DE&I") strategy and expanded its scope. Our new DE&I strategy consists of three impact areas which utilize twelve key levers to drive progress. For additional information on our DE&I efforts, see Item 1. Business, Human Capital Management in our 2021 Annual Report.
Global DE&I Strategy - Our 3 Impact Areas
Global DE&I Strategy - Our 12 Levers
18 2021 Proxy Statement
COVID-19 Response and Employee Safety
In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, our highest priority and primary concern has always been, and remains, the health and safety of our employees, our families and our communities. We have continued to focus on our planned strategic investments, including hiring new personnel where needed, during the pandemic. When initially faced with the pandemic, we implemented a business continuity plan with a dedicated incident management team to respond quickly and effectively to changes in our environment to continue offering our clients uninterrupted products, services and support while also protecting our employees. We continue to assist our employees during this difficult time by offering extensive benefit resources, presenting regular all-company meetings led by our CEO, and sending frequent emails to our employee base. Our internal employee surveys have shown that our employees have been very satisfied with the level of communications from management on our COVID-19 responses and have felt supported by FactSet throughout the pandemic.
At the outset of the pandemic, we required the vast majority of our employees at our offices across the globe (including our corporate headquarters) to work remotely and implemented global travel restrictions for our employees. Since that time, we have begun to re-open many of our offices globally, utilizing a three-phased approach to provide flexibility for employees wishing to work from our offices, with a focus on social distancing and safety, while acting consistently with applicable local regulations. We anticipate that the ability to open offices will vary significantly from region to region based on a number of factors, including the availability of COVID-19 vaccines and the spread of COVID-19 variants. We have worked with local organizations to procure vaccines for our employees and encouraged them to get vaccinated. Our offices will not re-open until local authorities permit us to do so and our own criteria and conditions to ensure employee health and safety are satisfied. Based on the success in working in a remote environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, we expect to implement a new work standard under which employees in many of our locations, where permitted by local laws and regulations, and where the role permits, will have the opportunity to choose between different work arrangements. These include working either in a hybrid arrangement, where an employee can split time between working from the office and working from a pre-approved remote location, or a fully remote arrangement, where an employee can work entirely from a pre-approved remote location.
Environment and Sustainability
FactSet is committed to sustainable growth, and in the past fiscal year we have enhanced our environmental strategy and successfully completed a number of key milestones. We became a proud signatory of the UN Global Compact and the internationally recognized Principles for Responsible Investment, demonstrating our commitment to providing, developing and promoting services that support our clients' implementation of these principles, as well as making those principles part of our strategy, culture, and day-to-day operations. As more organizations commit to investing responsibly, FactSet is uniquely positioned to empower investors to make informed decisions that drive sustainable growth.
While FactSet operates in a low-carbon industry, as a global business with a presence in more than 20 countries across six continents, we recognize that we have a responsibility to manage our environmental impact and be transparent about our practices. Therefore, during fiscal 2021, we published our third-party-validated Scope 1 and Scope 2 green house gas emissions for fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020 and provided disclosures on our carbon footprint to CDP. We also conducted a materiality study to identify FactSet's material environmental, social and governance ("ESG") topics. Many of these materials can be found on the Corporate Responsibility page of our website at https://www.factset.com/company/corporate-responsibility. We are dedicated to working towards disclosing additional environmental performance measures in the future and to further enhancing our sustainability practices.
Employee Engagement
We conduct an annual, anonymous and confidential global employee engagement survey administered by a third-party to capture our employees’ constructive feedback on a broad range of topics. In our fiscal 2021 employee engagement survey, we heard from the vast majority of our employees, and received over 10,000 employee comments, which told us that our employees continue to have pride in their work, colleagues, and company.
2021 Proxy Statement 19
Corporate Responsibility
We continue to invest in the communities where FactSet operates through our Corporate Responsibility program, uniting around our four Pillars of Service: Inspire tomorrow's engineers, Elevate to educate, Alleviate food insecurity, and Protect our environment. We offered a fully virtual employee volunteer program during fiscal 2021, transitioning to remote mentoring and other educational support programs, as well as new virtual learning and engagement opportunities.
During fiscal 2021, we delivered 263 volunteer events globally in 20 countries and 32 FactSet locations, with FactSet volunteers contributing nearly 11,000 volunteer roles and over 14,000 hours of service.
20 2021 Proxy Statement
In fiscal 2021, we delivered the following global campaigns with our strategic nonprofit partners:
•We launched Pledge for the Planet, a new sustainability initiative that challenges employees to change habits and have less harmful effects on the environment. For challenges accepted and completed, FactSet sponsored tree plantings with global reforestation charity, One Tree Planted. More than 1,200 FactSet employees participated in the campaign, resulting in over 12,000 trees planted, 6.4 million liters of water saved, and 12.7 kilograms of carbon dioxide saved.
•FactSet’s annual Hunger Awareness campaign included a new global keynote program with the UN World Food Programme and more than 48 events to educate, engage, and fundraise for our global and local hunger relief charity partners. The fiscal 2021 campaign raised $200,000 through Company and employee donations, resulting in 993,000 meals generated for over 200,000 people in need around the world.
| | |
You can view our most recent Corporate Responsibility Report at: https://issuu.com/factset/docs/factset_corporate_responsibility_report_2020?fr=sNWMzNTM2NzYyOTY |
Additional Corporate Governance Information
FactSet is
We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance, which
the Company believeswe believe are essential to running
itsour business efficiently, serving
itsour stockholders well and maintaining integrity in the marketplace.
Code of Business Conduct
The Company has
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Ethics Code”) that applies to all of the Company’sour employees, including the Company’sour principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, and all other officers, and the Company’sas well as our directors. A copy of the Ethics Code is available on the Company’sour website at https:https://investor.factset.com on the Leadership and Corporate Governance page of theour Investor Relations section.website. You may also request a copy of the Ethics Code by writing to Investor Relations, FactSet Research Systems Inc., 601 Merritt 7,at 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851.CT 06850. Any amendment to the Ethics Code (other than technical, administrative or non-substantive amendments) and any waiver of a provision of the Ethics Code that applies to a member of FactSet’sour Board or one of itsour executive officers will be promptly disclosed on the Leadership & Corporate Governance page of Company’sour Investor Relations website at https:https://investor.factset.com.
Stockholders and other interested parties may contact the Board, the
Chair, the Lead Independent Director, or
the non-management directors as a group by sending their correspondence
to:to the Board of Directors (or other appropriate group), c/o Corporate Secretary, FactSet Research Systems Inc.,
601 Merritt 7,at 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk,
Connecticut 06851;CT 06850 or through the email address: Board@factset.com. The Corporate Secretary will review all communications and forward them to the
Chairman or the Lead Independent Director, as appropriate.Chair. The Corporate Secretary may, however, filter out communications that do not relate to the Company’s business activities, operations or its public disclosures, but will maintain a record of these communications and make them available to the
Chairman or the Lead Independent DirectorChair (solicitations will not be recorded or forwarded). Any communications received by the
Chairman or Lead Independent DirectorChair regarding concerns relating to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be immediately brought to the attention of the Audit Committee and will be handled in accordance with the procedures established by the Audit Committee to address these matters.
Director Compensation Program
The general policy of the Board is that compensation for
independent directors should be a mix of cash and equity-based compensation.
FactSet doesWe do not pay management directors for Board service in addition to their regular employee compensation. The Compensation and Talent Committee, which consists solely of independent directors, has the primary responsibility for reviewing and considering any revisions to director compensation. The Board reviews the committee’s recommendations and determines the amount of director compensation. Each director is provided access to the FactSet service, at no charge, which allows them to utilize
the Company’sour suite of products.
2021 Proxy Statement 21
For fiscal 2018,2021, non-employee DirectorDirector compensation consisted of: | ●
|
•An annual retainer of $35,000. Each director may choose to receive the retainer as a quarterly cash payment, or receive the equivalent value in non-qualified stock options. |
| ●
| An equity grant having an intended grant date fair value of $75,000.
|
The Chairman, Mr. Hadley, is an employee of the Company and received no compensation for his service as Chairman and as a Director during fiscal 2018.
quarterly cash payment or receive the equivalent value in non-qualified stock options. •An equity grant of non-qualified stock options having an intended grant date fair value of $75,000.
Equity Compensation
The FactSet Research Systems Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option and Award Plan, as Amended and Restated (the “Director Plan”) provides for the grant of share-based awards, including stock options, to non-employee directors of FactSet.
Annual Grant
Under the existing Director Plan, the Compensation and Talent Committee may award an annual equity grant to each non-employee director on or around January 15th of each year. The number of option shares to be granted in order to deliver the intended value will be determined on the grant date using an option-pricing model. As such, the
The Compensation and Talent Committee recommended and the Board approved an annual equity grant of 1,935915 non-qualified stock options to each of the then seveneight non-employee directors serving on the Board on January 15, 2021. Additionally, each non-employee director serving on the Board on January 15, 2021 was given an award of $35,000 with the option to receive the retainer as a quarterly cash payment or receive the equivalent value in non-qualified stock options. For fiscal 2021, all directors, except for Mr. McGonigle, opted for the equity grant of 427 non-qualified stock options. The exercise price for the non-qualified stock options granted under the retainer and annual grant was $318.20 per share, being equal to the closing price of FactSet common stock on January 15, 2021. The grant date fair value for all non-qualified stock options was $82.01. These non-qualified stock options granted to directors vest 100% on the third anniversary of the date of grant and expire seven years from the date of grant.
New directors receive a one-time option grant, typically on or around January 15th after the new director's first annual meeting. At the recommendation of the Compensation and Talent Committee, Mr. Choy and Mr. Shavel each were granted a new director one-time grant of 914 stock options on January 15, 2021, at an exercise price of $318.20 and grant date fair value of $82.01. The non-qualified stock options granted to Mr. Choy and Mr. Shavel vest 100% on the third anniversary of the date of grant and expire seven years from the date of grant.
On September 22, 2020, the Board adopted stock ownership guidelines that require each of our non-employee directors to own FactSet stock having a value of at least $400,000. See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Stock Ownership and Holding Guidelines."
We pay or reimburse our directors for travel, lodging and related expenses incurred in connection with attending Board, committee and stockholder meetings and other Company business related events. From time to time, we may reimburse a director’s expenses for participation in third party-supplied continuing education related to the director’s Board or committee service. There was no reimbursement for educational participation made to the directors during fiscal 2021.
22 2021 Proxy Statement
Director Compensation Table
The following table provides information as to compensation for services of the non-employee directors during fiscal 2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) | Stock Awards | Option Awards(2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | All Other Compensation | Total |
| Robin A. Abrams | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 110,057 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 110,057 | |
Siew Kai Choy(3) | $ | 11,667 | | $ | — | | $ | 185,015 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 196,681 | |
| Malcolm Frank | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 110,057 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 110,057 | |
| Sheila B. Jordan | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 110,057 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 110,057 | |
James J. McGonigle(3) | $ | 23,333 | | $ | — | | $ | 75,039 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 98,372 | |
Lee Shavel(3) | $ | 11,667 | | $ | — | | $ | 185,015 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 196,681 | |
| Laurie Siegel | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 110,057 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 110,057 | |
| Joseph R. Zimmel | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 110,057 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 110,057 | |
1.On January 12, 2018.2016, the Compensation and Talent Committee approved a compensation policy for non-employee directors, whereby each non-employee director receives an annual retainer of $35,000 and an equity grant having an intended value of $75,000 for a calendar year of service from January through December. Each director may choose to receive the retainer as a quarterly cash payment or receive the equivalent annual value in non-qualified stock options each January. For calendar year 2021, all directors in office in January 2021 except Mr. McGonigle chose to receive the $35,000 annual retainer in non-qualified stock options. That grant and the $75,000 equity grant were made on January 15, 2021. The annual retainer and equity grant are included in the Option Awards column. See footnote 3 for cash fees earned by Messrs. Choy, Shavel and McGonigle.
2.The amounts in the Option Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair values, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Share-Based Payment, (“ASC Topic 718”), of stock option awards issued during fiscal 2021 pursuant to the Director Plan. For information on the valuation assumptions with respect to stock option grants, refer to the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. There can be no assurance that these grant date fair values will be realized by the non-employee directors. The actual gain that a non-employee director may receive from exercising an option sometime in the future may be higher or lower than these reported amounts, and these options have value only if the price of FactSet stock increases above the option’s exercise price. On January 15, 2021, we granted 915 stock options to each of the non-employee directors representing a grant-date fair value of $75,000. Additionally, each non-employee director was given an award of $35,000 with the option to receive the value in either a cash retainer or non-qualified stock options. All directors within office in January 2021 except for Mr. McGonigle chose to receive the exception of Ms. Jordan opted for the$35,000 award in equity, which resulted in an additional grant of 903427 non-qualified stock options. The strikeexercise price for allthe non-qualified stock options for both the retainer and annual grant was $197.75$318.20 per share, being equal to the closing price of the Company’sour common stock on January 12, 2018.15, 2021. The grant date fair value for all non-qualified stock options was $38.76. The non-qualified$82.01. Mr. Choy and Mr. Shavel each were granted a one-time grant of 914 stock options granted toon January 15, 2021, at an exercise price of $318.20 and grant date fair value of $82.01. At August 31, 2021, our non-employee directors vest 100% after three yearshad the following outstanding stock option awards, some of which were not fully vested: Robin A. Abrams, 17,700 options; Siew Kai Choy, 2,256 options; Malcolm Frank, 9,970 options; Sheila B. Jordan, 5,924 options; James J. McGonigle, 14,966 options; Lee Shavel, 2,256 options; Laurie Siegel, 10,048 options; and Joseph R. Zimmel, 5,924 options.
3.The fees earned by Messrs. Choy and Shavel during fiscal 2021 of $11,667 represent the pro rata portion of their annual retainer for the period of September 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, as they joined the Board on the anniversary dateJune 23, 2020, and received a pro rata portion of the grant and expire seven years from the date the options were granted. The Company does not have stock ownership guidelines that require directors to own Company stock.Expenses
The Company pays or reimburses directors for travel, lodging and related expenses incurred in connection with attending Board, Committee and stockholder meetings and other Company business related events. From time to time, the Company may reimburse a director’s expensestheir annual $35,000 retainer for their participation in third party-supplied continuing education related to the director’s Board or Committee service. Director expense reimbursements for such participationservice during 2020. The fees earned by Mr. McGonigle during fiscal 2018 totaled less than $5,000 per director and less than $10,0002021 of $23,333 represent the pro rata portion of his annual retainer for the period of January 1, 2021 through August 31, 2021, as he chose to receive his $35,000 retainer for his service during 2021 in the aggregate.
Director Compensation Table
The following table provides information as to compensation for services of the non-employee directors and Philip Hadley, Chairman of the Board of Directors, during fiscal 2018.
Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) | | | Stock Awards | | | Option Awards(3) | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | | | Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | | | All Other Compensation | | | Total | |
Philip Hadley(2) | | $ | 200,000 | | | $ | -- | | | | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 72,710 | | | $ | 272,710 | |
Robin A. Abrams | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | |
Scott A. Billeadeau | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | |
Malcolm Frank(4) | | $ | 11,667 | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 121,667 | |
Sheila B. Jordan | | $ | 35,000 | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 75,000 | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | |
James J. McGonigle | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | |
Laurie Siegel | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | |
Joseph R. Zimmel | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | | | $ | 110,000 | |
| (1)
| On January 12, 2016, the Compensation and Talent Committeeapproved a compensation policy for non-employee directors, whereby each non-employee director receives an annual retainer of $35,000 and an equity grant having an intended value of $75,000 for a calendar year of service from January through December. Each director may choose to receive the retainer as a quarterly cash payment, or receive the equivalent annual value in non-qualified stock options each January. For calendar year 2018, all directors with the exception of Ms. Jordan chose to receive the $35,000 annual retainer in non-qualified stock options.
|
| (2)
| Philip Hadley was an employee of the Company during fiscal 2018 with an annual salary of $200,000 for his employee services. He did not receive any compensation for his Board service and duties as Chairman, including the annual retainer and option awards. Amounts in the All Other Compensation column reflect employer matching contributions to the FactSet 401(k) Plan made on behalf of Mr. Hadley, the use of a Company automobile and the fair market value of the Company automobile transferred to him during fiscal 2018 upon termination of the Company-owned car program. At the time of the title transfer, the car had a fair market value of $47,223 and the book value was $0.
|
cash.
| (3)
| The amounts in the Option Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair values, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Share-Based Payment, (“ASC Topic 718”), of stock option awards issued during fiscal 2018 pursuant to the existing Director Plan. For information on the valuation assumptions with respect to stock option grants, refer to the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in FactSet’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. There can be no assurance that these grant date fair values will be realized by the non-employee directors. The actual gain that a non-employee director may receive from exercising an option sometime in the future may be higher or lower than these reported amounts, and these options have value only if the price of the Company’s stock increases above the option’s exercise price. On January 12, 2018, FactSet granted 1,935stock options to each of the non-employee directors representing a grant-date fair value of $75,000. Additionally, each non-employee director was given an award of $35,000 with the option to receive the value in either a cash retainer or non-qualified stock options. All directors with the exception of Ms. Jordan, chose to receive the $35,000 award in equity, thus received a grant of 903 non-qualified stock options. The exercise price for all non-qualified stock options was $197.75 per share, being equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on January 12, 2018. The grant date fair value for all non-qualified stock options was $38.76. At August 31, 2018, the non-employee directors had the following outstanding stock option awards, some of which were not fully or partially vested:Robin A. Abrams, 22,107 options; Scott A. Billeadeau, 19,485 options; Malcolm Frank, 7,046 options; Sheila B. Jordan, 6,143 options; James J. McGonigle, 19,485 options; Laurie Siegel, 10,758 options;and Joseph R. Zimmel, 19,485options.
|
| (4)
| The fees earned or paid in cash to Mr. Frank during fiscal 2018 of $11,667 represent four months (September through December 2017) of his annual retainer fee, which he had elected to receive in cash for the 2017 calendar year. In December 2017, Mr. Frank elected to receive his calendar year 2018 annual retainer fee of $35,000 in equity, thus was granted non-qualified stock options having a grant-date fair value of $35,000 in January 2018. This change in election from receiving quarterly cash payments for the 2017 calendar year to a January 2018 equity award for the 2018 calendar year resulted in his receiving total compensation of $121,667 in FactSet’s 2018 fiscal year (September 2017 to August 2018). Had the value paid to Mr. Frank been allocated on a monthly basis over the fiscal 2018 year, his total compensation would have been $110,000.
|
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending the nomination of directors and making recommendations to the Board regarding prospective nominees. The NominatingCommittee identifies qualified candidates to become Board members consistent with criteria approved by the Board and Corporate Governanceour Director Nominee Selection Policy. The Committee from time to time reviewsconsiders the appropriate skills and characteristics required of board members, including factors that it seeks in boardBoard members such as diversity of business experience, viewpoints, personal background and diversity of skills in finance, technology, marketing, internationalcapability, availability to serve, business and professional experience, talents,
2021 Proxy Statement 23
perspectives, conflicts of interest, and other areas that are expectedrelevant factors. The Committee seeks individuals as nominees with the highest personal and professional integrity, who have demonstrated strong ability and judgment and who shall be effective, in conjunction with the other nominees to contribute to an effective Board. In evaluating potential candidates for the Board, in collectively serving the Nominatinglong-term interests of our stakeholders. The Committee aims to actively identify and Corporate Governance Committee considers theserecruit diverse candidates, including considering factors in the light of the specific needs of the Board at that time. such as race, gender, age and national origin.
The description of each nominee set forth in the “Business Experience and Qualification of Board Members” section includes the primary individual experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each of
the Company’sour directors that led to the conclusion that each director should serve as a member of the Board at this time. Nominees for the Board should be committed to enhancing long-term stockholder value, must possess a high level of personal and professional ethics, and must demonstrate strength of character, independent thought, sound judgment, integrity, professionalism, leadership, meaningful
business accomplishments and business
knowledge, and English proficiency. The Board is composed of a diverse group of leaders.knowledge. The Board encourages selection of directors who will
in addition to fulfilling the Company’shelp us fulfill our responsibility to
itsour stockholders
and contribute to
FactSet’sour overall corporate
goals: providing technology leadership, effective execution, high client satisfaction and superior employee working environment.goals.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee accepts nominees recommended by stockholders in written communications to our Secretary in accordance with its policy and evaluates them in the same manner and under the same criteria as candidates and nominees identified via other sources. The Committee will consider director nominees recommended by stockholders in written communications to FactSet’sour Secretary prior to August 1 for the ensuing election. Any such communication must follow the guidelines set forth in the FactSet Research Systems Inc.our Director Nominee Selection Policy, a copy of which may be found on the Company’sour Investor Relations website at https:https://investor.factset.com. The policy lists selection criteria including integrity, professionalism and sound business judgment. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider any nominee recommended by a stockholder in accordance with its policy under the same criteria as any other potential nominee.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will select nominees for directors pursuant to the following process:
| ●
| Identification of director candidates based upon suggestions from directors and senior management, recommendations by stockholders and potentially a director search firm.
|
| ●
|
•Identification of the qualifications and skills sought in director candidates in the context of the size of the Board relative to target, current composition and needs of the Board, and the strengths, weaknesses and gaps identified by the committee in its evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board. •Identification of director candidates based upon suggestions from current directors and senior management, recommendations by stockholders and, if so desired, referrals from a director search firm or equivalent service retained by FactSet. •Review of each candidate’s qualifications to determine which candidates best meet the Board’s required and desired criteria. •Interviews of an interested candidate by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair, at least one other committee member, the CEO and appropriate members of senior management. •Report to the Board by the committee on the selection process. •Recommendation by the committee of a nominee to the Board. •Satisfactory completion of a background check on the nominee. •Formal nomination by the Board for inclusion of the candidate in the slate of directors for the annual meeting of stockholders or appointment by the Board to fill a vacancy between stockholder meetings.
A stockholder who wishes to recommend to determine which candidates best meet the Board’s required and desired criteria. The review of the nominee’s qualifications includes capabilities, availability to serve, conflicts of interest and other relevant factors. The Committee shall search for individuals as nominees with the highest personal and professional integrity, who shall have demonstrated strong ability and judgment and who shall be effective in serving the long-term interest of stockholders. |
| ●
| Interviews of an interested candidate by the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, at least one other committee member and the CEO.
|
| ●
| Report to the Board by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on the selection process.
|
| ●
| Recommendation by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of a nominee to the Board.
|
| ●
| Formal nomination of the candidate by the Board for inclusion in the slate of directors for the Meeting or appointment by the Board to fill a vacancy between stockholder meetings.
|
For candidates proposed to it, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee requires:a candidate for nomination to the Board must communicate with our Secretary at our corporate headquarters address at 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk, CT 06850 and provide in a timely manner: (i) the candidate’s full name, address, email and phone number; (ii) a verbal statement by the candidate that he or shethe candidate wishes to be nominated and is willing and able to serve as a director; (iii) a verbal statement of the good faith belief by the proposing stockholder that the candidate meets the Company’sour criteria, and (iv) such other written documentation as the Committee may reasonably request to permit a determination by the Board as to whether such candidate meets the required and desired director selection criteria set forth in the FactSetour By-laws, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Director Nominee Selection Policy.
Additionally, the Board may require that any such candidate proposed by a stockholder submit to a standard background check.
24 2021 Proxy Statement
Proxy Access
Alternatively, a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, who own 3% or more of the Company’s voting stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials nominees for election as directors of FactSet. Such stockholder or group of stockholders may nominate up to the greater of two nominees or 20% of the Board, provided that the stockholder or group of stockholders and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the proxy access provision of our By-laws, which was adopted on September 27, 2021.
2021 Proxy Statement 25
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Stockholders will elect three directors at the Meeting. If elected, the directors will hold office for a term not exceeding three years or until a successor is elected and qualified. Your proxy will be voted in favor of those persons to serve as directors, unless you indicate to the contrary on the proxy.
Management expects that the nominees will be available for election. However, if a nominee is not a candidate when the election occurs, your proxy will be voted to elect another nominee to be designated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board to fill any vacancy. Business experience and qualifications on these nominees and the other members of the Board is presented in this Proxy Statement under the caption “Business Experience and Qualifications of Board Members.”
Vote Required: The three nominees for election as directors of the Company who receive a majority number of “FOR”votes cast at the meeting (either in personat the virtual Meeting or by proxy) will be elected as directors.
| | |
FactSet’s Boardrecommends that Scott A. Billeadeau, Philip A. Hadley, that: •Siew Kai Choy, Lee Shavel, and Joseph R. Zimmel eacheach be elected to serve a three-year term expiringexpiring in concurrence with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders for2021. 2024. |
26 2021 Proxy Statement
The Board has charged the Audit Committee with a number of responsibilities, including review of the adequacy of
FactSet’sour financial reporting, accounting systems and controls. The Board has reviewed independence for audit committee members as defined
inby both the NYSE and NASDAQ and has determined that each member of the Audit Committee met each listing’s standard. The Audit Committee has a direct line of communication with FactSet’s independent
registered public
accountants.accounting firm.
The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter, which is available on the Company’sour website athttps:
https://investor.factset.com. In fulfilling its responsibility, the Audit Committee discusses with the Company’s independent registered public auditorsaccounting firm the overall scope and specific plans for their audit. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with FactSet’sour management and Ernst & Young LLP the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’sour Fiscal 20182021 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees. Such review included discussions concerning the quality of accounting principles as applied and significant judgments affecting FactSet’sour consolidated financial statements. Lastly, the Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP concerning such auditors’ independence from FactSet and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence, as required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In reliance on the reviews and discussions conducted with management and the independent public auditors, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board and the Board has approved the inclusion of the audited consolidated financial statements for
the fiscal year ended August 31,
2018,2021 in
FactSet’sour Fiscal
20182021 Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.
SUBMITTED BY THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Scott A. Billeadeau, Chair
Robin A. Abrams
Sheila B. Jordan
Joseph R. Zimmel
| | |
| Lee Shavel, Chair |
| Robin A. Abrams |
| Siew Kai Choy |
| Sheila B. Jordan |
| Joseph R. Zimmel |
2021 Proxy Statement 27
Proposal 2: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Beginning with the audit of FactSet’s 2014 fiscal year, Ernst & Young LLP has served as
FactSet’sour independent registered public accounting firm. Their initial appointment was ratified by stockholders at
theour 2013 Annual Meeting. The Audit Committee has again appointed Ernst & Young LLP as
FactSet’sour independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31,
2019,2022, and the Board has recommended ratification of that appointment to the stockholders of the Company. A representative from Ernst & Young LLP will attend the Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and make a statement should they desire to do so.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees and Services
The following table shows the total fees billed or accrued for professional services provided to
FactSetus by Ernst & Young LLP for
the fiscal years ended
2018August 31, 2021 and
2017.| | | Fiscal 2018 | | | Fiscal 2017 | |
Audit fees(1) | | $ | 1,147,978 | | | $ | 799,700 | |
Audit-related fees(2) | | | 5,000 | | | | 25,000 | |
Tax fees(3) | | | 94,029 | | | | 60,000 | |
All other fees(4) | | | 1,737 | | | | 1,853 | |
Total | | $ | 1,248,744 | | | $ | 886,553 | |
| (1)
| Represents fees for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of FactSet’s annual consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting, for review of the interimconsolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and for services that are normally provided by in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
| (2)
| Represents fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of FactSet’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”
|
| (3)
| Tax fees were for services related to tax consulting services.
|
| (4)
| All other fees represent fees for professional services other than the services reported above, including permissible consulting services and subscriptions to accounting research software.
|
2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2021 | | Fiscal 2020 |
Audit fees(1) | $ | 1,406,600 | | | $ | 1,322,760 | |
Audit-related fees(2) | 0 | | 0 |
Tax fees(3) | 40,000 | | 0 |
All other fees(4) | 3,600 | | 2,200 |
| Total | $ | 1,450,200 | | | $ | 1,324,960 | |
(1)Represents fees for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and of our internal control over financial reporting, for review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and for services that are normally provided by in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
(2)Represents fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”
(3)Tax fees were for services related to tax consulting services.
(4)All other fees represent fees for professional services other than the services reported above, including permissible consulting services and subscriptions to accounting research software.
Policy on
Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services
The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to report periodically to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. During fiscal
20182021 and
2017, 100%2020, all of the services provided by Ernst & Young LLP were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.
The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of non-audit services by Ernst & Young LLP during fiscal
20182021 and
2017,2020, respectively, was compatible with maintaining the independence of
eachthe firm.
Audit Partner and Audit Firm Rotation
The Audit Committee’s policy is that the audit engagement partner should rotate off the Company’s account no less frequently than every five years. With respect to audit firm rotation, the Audit Committee believes that it is inappropriate to establish a fixed limit on the tenure of the independent auditor. Continuity and the resulting in-depth knowledge of the Company strengthen the audit. Moreover, the mandatory partner rotation policy expressed above, the normal turnover of audit personnel, the Audit Committee’s policy regarding the hiring of auditor personnel, and the Audit Committee’s practices restricting non-audit engagements of the independent auditor, all mitigatesmitigate against any loss of objectivity that theoretically could arise from a long-term relationship. As a
28 2021 Proxy Statement
result of the
policy, the partner
who had served as the lead engagement partner on the FactSet account for the past five fiscal years will be rotating off for fiscal 2019 and replaced byrotation policy, a new Ernst & Young LLP
partner.partner rotated onto our account for our 2019 fiscal year, replacing a lead engagement partner that served our account for the prior five fiscal years. As provided in the Audit Committee’s charter,
and as further described below, the Audit Committee regularly evaluates its independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee will periodically consider alternatives to ensure that the Audit Committee and
the Company’sour stockholders are receiving the best audit services available.
As noted in the Audit Committee charter and in the Audit Committee Report,
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent auditor, reports directly to the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee is charged with evaluating
itsthe independent auditor's independence.
| | |
FactSet’s Board recommends that you vote to ratify the appointment of Ernst & YoungLLP as the Company’sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31,2019. 2022. |
2021 Proxy Statement 29
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section describes the general objectives, principles and philosophy of our executive compensation program, focused primarily on the compensation during fiscal
20182021 of
theour Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) who are listed as follows:
| ■
| | | | |
F. Philip Snow – Snow: | Chief Executive Officer |
Helen L. Shan(1): | ■
| John W. Wiseman – Executive Vice President Globaland Chief Revenue Officer
|
Goran Skoko(2): | Executive Vice President, Managing Director EMEA and Asia Pacific, Head of Sales and ClientResearch & Advisory Solutions |
| Gene D. Fernandez: | ■
| Gene Fernandez – Executive Vice President, Chief Technology and ProductContent Officer
|
| Rachel R. Stern: | ■
| Maurizio Nicolelli – SeniorExecutive Vice President, Chief FinancialLegal Officer,
Global Head of Strategic Resources and Secretary |
| ■
| Edward Baker-Greene – Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
|
On May 8, 2018, FactSet announced that Mr. Nicolelli would be separating from the Company but would remain
1. Ms. Shan served as our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) until his successor was appointedduring the entire 2021 fiscal year and would remain an employeethrough October 4, 2021.
2. During fiscal 2021, Mr. Skoko served as Executive Vice President, Managing Director EMEA and Asia Pacific, Head of
FactSet until December 31, 2018. Mr. Nicolelli ceased to be CFO on August 31, 2018.On July 5, 2018, FactSet entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Baker-Greene whereby he would be separating from the Company, but remain Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”) until his successor was appointed and would remain an employee of FactSet until November 30, 2018.
Wealth Solutions.
Our fiscal 2021 results and NEO compensation decisions continue to illustrate the application of our pay-for-performance philosophy, with NEO pay being driven by another year of solid financial performance, as well as continued positive developments in other significant areas of our operation, such as: our evolving diversity, equity and inclusion ("DE&I") program; our response to the COVID-19 pandemic and our efforts to ensure employee safety; our environmental sustainability efforts; our employee engagement; our corporate responsibility activities; and continued developments in our compensation governance structure, including adoption of new executive and director stock ownership and holding guidelines.
Our Business and Strategic Overview
Our talent
FactSet is focused on solving our clients’ greatest challengesa global financial data and analytics company with the power of collaboration. Our goals include establishing FactSet as the premieropen and flexible technology partner forand a purpose to drive the investment community settingto see more, think bigger, and do their best work. Our strategy is to become the standardleading open content and financial analytics platform in the industry that delivers differentiated advantage for world class enterpriseour clients’ success.
For over 40 years, the FactSet platform has delivered expansive data, sophisticated analytics, and flexible technology that global financial professionals need to power their critical investment workflows. Over 160,000 asset managers and owners, bankers, wealth managers, corporate firms, including private equity and venture capital firms, and others, use our personalized solutions to identify opportunities, explore ideas, and gain a competitive advantage, in areas spanning investment research, portfolio construction and analysis, trade execution, performance measurement, risk management, and reporting across the investment lifecycle.
We provide financial data and market intelligence on securities, companies and industries to enable our clients to research investment ideas, as well as offering them the capabilities to analyze, monitor and manage their portfolios. We combine dedicated client service with open and flexible technology offerings, such as a configurable desktop and mobile platform, comprehensive data feeds, cloud-based digital solutions, and beingapplication programming interfaces (APIs). Our revenue is primarily derived from subscriptions to our products and services such as workstations, portfolio analytics, and market data.
We advance our industry by comprehensively understanding our clients’ workflows, solving their most complex challenges, and helping them achieve their goals. By providing them with the career destination for theleading open content and analytics platform, an expansive universe of concorded data they can trust, next-generation workflow support designed to help them grow and see their next best action, and the brightest.industry’s most committed service specialists, FactSet puts our clients in a position to outperform.
Client needs and market dynamics continue to evolve at an accelerated pace with an increasing demand for differentiated, personalized, and connected data, an ongoing shift to multi-asset class investing, and cost rationalization, as the shift from active
30 2021 Proxy Statement
to passive investing continues. Clients are seeking new cloud-based solutions that enable self-service and automation, open and flexible systems, and increased efficiencies when integrating and managing data as part of their own broader digital transformations.
FactSet’s strategy focuses on building the leading open content and analytics platform that delivers differentiated advantages for our clients’ success – in keeping with our purpose of enabling the investment community to see more, think bigger and do their best work. We believe strongly that maintaining a culturewant to be the trusted partner of accountabilitychoice for clients, to anticipate their needs and transparencyprovide them with the most innovative solutions to make them more efficient. This includes transforming the way our clients discover, decide, and act on an opportunity using our digital platform; purposefully increasing our pace and speed to market by streamlining how we work; and investing in our future workforce.
At the center of our strategy is the
best way to achieverelentless focus on our
ultimate objective: serving the long-term best interests of our employees, clients and
stockholders. Our visiontheir FactSet experience. We want to be a trusted partner and
strategy are centered on consistent long-term growth. Our performance over time combined withservice provider, offering hyper-personalized digital products for clients to research ideas, uncover relevant insights, and leverage cognitive computing to help get the most out of their data and analytics. Additionally, we continually evaluate business opportunities such as acquisitions and partnerships to help us expand our
balanced capital allocation framework has resulted in long term value creation for our shareholders.capabilities and competitive differentiators across the investment portfolio lifecycle.
Performance Highlights for Fiscal
20182021
In fiscal
2018,2021, FactSet
hadcontinued the
following accomplishments: | ■
| Revenues increased 10.6% to $1.35 billion, up 5.6%* organically.
|
| ■
| Annual Subscription Value (“ASV”) was $1.39 billion, up 5.7% organically.
|
| ■
| Organic ASV plus professional services resulted in a growth rate of 5.9%.
|
| ■
| Diluted EPS increased 4.1% to $6.78. Adjusted diluted EPS increased 16.7% to $8.53*.
|
| ■
| Client count increased by 8.4% or 398 during the year, while users grew by 3.4% or 3,051 from the prior year.
|
| ■
| In May 2018, FactSet increased its quarterly dividend by $0.08 or 14.3% per share to $0.64, marking the thirteenth consecutive year the Company has increased dividends, highlighting its continued commitment to returning value to shareholders.
|
| ■
| FactSet returned $393.4 million to stockholders in the form of share repurchases and dividends during the fiscal year. This return represents an average cash return of 91%, as a percentage of free cash flow and proceeds from employee stock plans.
|
| ■
| FactSet was selected to be the primary market data provider for Merrill Lynch Wealth Management, which we result in the deployment of our market data solution to more than 15,000 wealth management professionals across Merrill Lynch.
|
| ■
| FactSet won numerous awards including Excellence in Asset Management and Servicing, Data and Technology at the CIO Industry Innovation Awards, Best Overall Technology Provider at the Buy-Side Technology Awards from Waters Technology and Data Vendor of the Year at the Risk.Net Market Technology Awards.
|
| ■
| FactSet expanded its Multi-Asset Class (MAC) risk models, leading to several global client wins and strengthening its position in the analytics market.
|
| ■
| FactSet launched Open: FactSet Marketplace, a new online platform that offers both financial and alternative data such as satellite, sentiment, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data to address the growing demand for integrated data.
|
| ■
| The Company released its first annual Corporate Social Responsibility Report, which covered the fiscal year ending August 31, 2017. The report highlights FactSet’s recent achievements and sets a trajectory for future CSR goals.
|
*solid execution which has resulted in consistent growth and returns for our stockholders. Among the many FactSet accomplishments in fiscal 2021 compared to fiscal 2020:
▪Revenues increased 6.5% to $1.59 billion, up 6.3%1 organically, marking our 41st consecutive year of increase.
▪Annual Subscription Value ("ASV") plus Professional Services was $1.69 billion at August 31, 2021, compared with $1.56 billion at August 31, 2020. Organic ASV plus Professional Services was $1.68 billion at August 31, 2021, up 7.2% from the prior year.
▪Diluted earnings per share ("EPS") increased 7.4% to $10.36. Adjusted diluted EPS increased 3.0%1 to $11.201. This marks the 25th consecutive year that we have increased our adjusted diluted EPS.
▪Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $555.2 million. Free cash flow increased 15.3%1 to $493.9 million1.
▪Client count increased by 9.8% or 578 during the year to 6,453 as of August 31, 2021.
▪User count grew by 14.0% or 19,796 from the prior year to 160,932 at August 31, 2021.
2021 Proxy Statement 31
▪Annual ASV retention was greater than 95%. When expressed as a percentage of clients, annual retention improved to 91% year-over-year.
1.Organic revenue, Adjusted diluted EPS and Free cash flow are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation to the most directly corresponding GAAP figure, see page 33figures, refer to "Results of the Company’s Fiscal 2018Operations, Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our fiscal 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our Solid Execution Has Led▪In May 2021, we increased our quarterly dividend by $0.05 or 6.5% per share to Consistent Growth$0.82, marking the 22nd consecutive year we increased our dividends, highlighting our continued commitment to returning value to stockholders.
▪We returned $382.6 million to stockholders in the form of share repurchases and dividends during the fiscal year, representing a return of 69% as a percentage of free cash flow and proceeds from employee stock plans.
▪Since 2017, we have repurchased 5.6 million shares for approximately $1.3 billion under our share repurchase program and paid approximately $0.5 billion in dividends, for an approximate total return of $1.8 billion to our stockholders. This return represents a five year average cash return of 81% as a percentage of free cash flow and proceeds from employee stock plans.
Continued Returns to Stockholders
▪We continued to make significant developments in our ESG efforts, including our evolving DE&I program, our response to the COVID-19 pandemic and our efforts to ensure employee safety, our environmental sustainability efforts, our employee engagement, and our corporate responsibility activities. See "Corporate Governance - Corporate Sustainability" above.
▪We completed the acquisitions of ESG data company Truvalue Labs, BTU Analytics, a leading provider of North American renewables, power, oil, and natural gas data and analytics, and Cabot Investment Technology, an analytics platform that generates behavior-based insights and skills quantification for asset managers and asset owners.
▪We launched new data and technology solutions, including an integration with Microsoft Teams, a joint ESG offering with Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd., and the availability of FactSet has had solid execution and consistent growthConcordance Service on Snowflake.
▪We furthered our wealth management business with multiple wins, including being selected by Raymond James Ltd. as its market data provider for stockholders, which have been drivenfinancial advisors in partCanada. We were also selected by the following: |  | Strong organic growth, increasing ASV |
|
| Leveraging acquisitions (nine acquisitions completed in the last five years)
|
|
| Minimizing the effective tax rate (reduced from over 30% in 2014 to 18% by the end of fiscal 2018)
|
|
| Increasing our quarterly dividend by 14% per share, marking the thirteenth consecutive year we have increased dividends
|
|
| Repurchasing over 10 million shares in the last five fiscal years and returning an approximate $1.7 billion to stockholders under our share repurchase program
|
|
| Management of operating margins and operating expenses
|
ASV is used asRoyal Bank of Canada to be the primary metric market data and technology provider for its entire wealth management organization.
▪We launched Truvalue Lab's ESG content in the Japanese market by integrating it into Smartplus' Wealth Wing, one of the leading Japanese wealth management platforms.
32 2021 Proxy Statement
▪During our 2021 fiscal year, our data and solutions received top honors in more than 30 industry awards competitions and rankings. We're honored to be recognized by so many prestigious organizers and media outlets across our breadth of workflow solutions and data types and thank our clients for their support and all of our FactSet employees who work to develop, innovate and support our data and workflow solutions that address the ever-evolving needs of our clients. The recognitions span a variety of workflows including research, risk, performance, trading, and wealth management. Highlights include:
•Alternative Data Vendor of the Year, Risk.net Markets Technology Awards 2021
•Best Alternative Data Consolidator, A-Team TradingTech Insight Awards USA 2021
•Best Alternative Data Initiative, Inside Market Data + Inside Reference Data Awards 2020
•Best Alternative Data Provider, Inside Market Data + Inside Reference Data Awards 2021
•Best Alternative Data Provider, Waters Rankings 2021
•Best Client Reporting Solution, FundTech Awards 2020
•Best ESG Data Provider, Inside Market Data + Inside Reference Data Awards 2021
•Best Overall Data or Service Provider, Inside Market Data + Inside Reference Data Awards 2021
•Best Performance Measurement and Attribution System Provider, Waters Rankings 2021
•ESG Data Provider of the Year, Environmental Finance's Sustainable Investment Awards 2021
•Most Innovative Smart Desktops, A-Team Innovation Awards 2021
2021 Proxy Statement 33
ASV plus Professional Services Growth is one of the primary metrics we use to measure our performance, and it is a key measure used in our annual incentive plan. We believe that this measurement is useful as an indication of our future growth and sustainable performance. As illustrated in the graph below, our ASV plus Professional Services has grown by 62%over 26% since 20132017 and has been strongly correlated with stock price growth.
Compensation
PhilosophyFactSet’sGovernance Developments
We are continually reviewing and improving our compensation governance process and procedures. During fiscal 2021, we adopted new executive compensation is structured to encourage management decisions and behaviorsdirector stock ownership and holding guidelines that align with the long-term interestsrequire our non-employee directors and certain of our stockholders. To achievesenior executives, including all of our strategic goals,NEOs, to maintain a material personal financial stake in FactSet to promote a long-term perspective in managing the enterprise and to align stockholder, executive and director interests. See "Stock Ownership and Holding Guidelines" below.
Compensation Philosophy
Pillars of our Compensation Philosophy
Our compensation philosophy and principles have remained steadfast over time, but we designedcontinue to evolve our compensation programs to meet these needs in a competitive rapidly changing global environment. We have two key pillars to our compensation philosophy:
| | |
Our executive compensation is structured to encourage management decisions and behaviors that align with the long-term interests of our stockholders. |
To achieve our strategic goals, we design our compensation program to attract, motivate and retain employees who can successfully execute our strategy. |
34 2021 Proxy Statement
Our Compensation Principles
At the heart of our compensation program are six principles that govern the design of our compensation program. The Compensation and Talent Committee works to attract, motivateembed these principles across the various elements of our executive compensation.
| | |
The overall employee value proposition transcends compensation, to include our work environment, professional development, employee well-being, a high-performance culture, and challenging work opportunities. |
We pay for performance as measured by our collective operating performance as a company and individual performance toward executing our strategy, accelerating growth, and contributing to company-wide results. |
Performance is evaluated, not only on what goals are achieved over the short and long term, but also on how they are achieved, specifically to maintain the strong culture and the collaborative mindset that continues to be critical to our success. |
We believe in paying not only for our operating results but also for progress in building our foundation in ways that position FactSet for future growth. |
We believe our compensation program promotes a long-term ownership mindset and attracts, motivates and retains our talent who drive stockholder value over time. |
We establish total compensation packages for different roles that balance external market pay competitiveness with an internal framework considering the contribution within our organization. Compensation includes cash elements which are targeted to be in line with the market and equity opportunities that can be worth substantially more as we grow and achieve targets in line with our strategic plans. |
Role of the Compensation and
retain employees who can successfully execute our strategy.Talent Committee
The Compensation and Talent Committee of the Board oversees our executive compensation program, including the evaluation and approval of
the compensation plans, policies and programs offered to our CEO, NEOs and the CEO’s other direct reports. The Compensation and Talent Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board, and is comprised entirely of independent, non-employee directors.
Stockholder Engagement and Say on Pay
Management and the Board make themselves available to investors to have a continuing dialogue and to receive any feedback our stockholders may have to better understand their opinions regarding our governance and compensation plans. Our
Compensation PrinciplesBoard is focused on increasing outreach to our investors during the 2022 fiscal year to gather more direct feedback on governance and compensation matters.
2021 Proxy Statement 35
Historically, we have received extremely high approval percentages for our executive compensation programs. At the heartour 2020 Annual Meeting, 96.7% of the votes were cast “FOR” approval of our executive compensation program are six principlesprogram. This continues the trend of high rates of stockholder support for our executive compensation programs, which has seen approval levels in excess of 95% at all of our Annual Meetings since 2016. We believe the results of these votes affirm the support of our stockholders for our executive compensation programs. Despite these high scores, we believe that govern its design. In designingwe can continue to enhance our compensation program,programs to establish an even more solid tie between pay and performance.
Compensation Governance Features
We employ several best practice compensation governance policies and practices. Below is a summary of “what we do” and “what we don't do” in terms of compensation governance.
| | | | | |
| What we do: | What we don't do: |
•Pay for performance with focus on long-term value creation | •No employment contracts for NEOs |
•Quantitative company performance measures | •No officer hedging or pledging of FactSet stock |
•Clawback policy that covers both long-term and short-term incentive awards | •No significant perquisites or benefits |
•Annual risk assessment of pay programs and structure | •No excise tax gross ups |
•Annual say-on-pay vote | •No “evergreen” annual share increase provision in our equity stock plans |
•Double-trigger change of control vesting provisions | •No repricing of stock options |
•Independent compensation consultant for the Compensation and Talent Committee with only independent directors | •No discount from fair market value permitted in setting the exercise price of stock options |
•Robust stock ownership requirements for NEOs and other members of management | •No pensions or supplemental executive retirement, health or insurance benefits |
•Discourage imprudent risk taking | •No dividends paid on performance share units or restricted share units unless they vest |
•Executive severance plan covering NEOs and other members of management | •No individual severance or change-in-control agreements with NEOs and other members of management |
Fiscal 2021 Compensation Structure and Incentive Program Changes
For fiscal 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee
works to embed theseremained focused on implementing changes consistent with our executive compensation philosophy and principles
acrossand continuing the
various elementscompensation plan design themes implemented as a result of
executive compensation.1) | The overall employee value proposition transcends compensation, including our work environment, employee well-being, flexibility, and personal development.
|
2) | We pay for performance as measured by our collective operating performance as a company and individual performance toward executing our strategy, accelerating growth, and contributing to company-wide results.
|
3) | Performance is evaluated, not only on what goals are achieved over the short and long term, but also on how they are achieved, specifically to maintain the strong culture and the collaborative mindset that continues to be critical to our success.
|
4) | We believe in paying not only for our operating results but also for progress in building our foundation in ways that position FactSet for future growth.
|
5) | We believe our compensation program promotes a long-term ownership mindset and attracts, motivates and retains our talent who drive stockholder value over time.
|
6) | We establish total compensation packages for different roles that balance external market pay competitiveness with an internal framework considering the contribution within our organization. Compensation includes cash elements which are targeted to be in line with the market, and equity opportunities that can be worth substantially more as our Company grows and achieves targets in line with our strategic plans.
|
2018 Compensation Structure and Incentive Program Changes
During fiscal 2018 and 2017, FactSet management engaged Korn Ferry Hay Group, Inc. (“Hay Group” or the “consultant”) to conduct a comprehensive executive officer total compensation market review. review performed by Farient Advisors, LLC, independent compensation consultant to the Compensation and Talent Committee, in fiscal 2020.
This review included,
among other items, an analysis of compensation levels (e.g., competitiveness of base salary, annual incentive,
and long-term incentives)
as well asand incentive program design (e.g., annual incentive program targets and measures, long-term incentive plan targets,
vehicles,compensation methods, and performance measures)
relative to our peer group. The Compensation and Talent Committee considered analyses and recommendations presented by FactSet management and Hay Group. Several meetings and discussions were held with the Compensation and Talent Committee and management to develop future compensation plan designs.. The purpose of the competitive review and discussions were two-fold: 1) to ensure alignmentthat our compensation programs:
•are consistent with competitive market practices;practices and 2) to ensure that FactSet’s compensation programs were appropriately aligned with FactSet’slevels;
•support our go-forward business strategystrategy; and
•align with our compensation philosophy.The information below summarizesphilosophy, principles and pay-for-performance mindset.
36 2021 Proxy Statement
Based on this detailed compensation study, we found a significant competitive pay gap, which we began to deal with in fiscal 2020 and continued to address when designing our fiscal 2021 compensation program. We also took into account that the keycompetition for talent is increasing while we need to be equipped to recruit and retain the top talent that will help us accomplish our long-term goals.
As a result, for fiscal 2021, we made the following changes
made in 2018 to
our compensation program at the NEO level
along withfor the
supporting business
rationale.rationales listed below.
Change
| | Business Rationale
| | | |
■Change | EstablishmentBusiness Rationale
|
Continued to revise the mix of discrete annualsalary versus short-term incentive | •Increased salaries and reduced short-term incentive plan targets as a percentage of salary, bringing the executives closer to market-competitive (50th percentile) salary levels and allowing us the ability to better attract and retain talent •Maintains a direct link to performance and continued push for greater performance throughout the year |
| Continued to increase the amount of long term incentive, particularly performance-based long-term incentive, as a component of total compensation | •Increased long-term incentive plan targets for each plan participant | | ■ | FactSet had historically utilized a broad approachcloser to determine annual incentive payments and50th percentile levels, lessening the pay gap between the value of FactSet's long-term incentive planaward grant levels, which included assessmentsvalue versus the market
•Focuses executive efforts on specific long-term financial goals •Value of job level, performance, and internal equity; in 2018, discrete target opportunities were developedfuture earned reward is tied to align with market practices and provide more clear and consistent messages to plan participants on performance expectations and resulting payout levels | |
■ | Establishment of financial guidelines for the annual incentive, with specified threshold, target, and stretch levels of performance
| | ■ | The revised annual incentive program structure provides for pre-established financial guidelines on a company-wide or “corporate” level; this program enables a greater line-of-sight toboth financial performance and payout levels among executives
| stock price •Ties executive compensation to financial metrics that drive long-term stockholder value |
■Revised leverage percentages (threshold and stretch) for the short-term incentive program for all members of the executive team | For fiscal 2018,
•Expanded leverage range to 50% to 150% from 75% to 125% for short-term incentive program, expanding pay opportunity for stretch performance to create increased incentive for executives to achieve short-term financial targets, while reducing risk of undue pressure in plan design by lowering the financial measures selected wereperformance required to achieve a reduced threshold level of payment |
| Adjusted weightings of various elements within the short-term incentive program | •Increased ASV plus Professional Services Growth and decreased Adjusted Operating Margin | | ■ | Although FactSet management, weighting in company performance component
•Reduced individual performance component from 20% to 10% of short-term incentive this year to increase focus on teamwork, emphasize corporate financial performance and drive strategic objectives •For strategic workflow executives, decreased company component from 50% to 45% of short-term incentive and increased strategic workflow component from 30% to 45% of short-term incentive to drive increased focus on areas within the Committee, and the consultant evaluated several potential measures used by peers and considered by investors, ASV Growth and Adjusted Operating Margin were deemed to have the greatest degree of correlation with stockholder value creation | |
| | | ■ | These measures ensure a balance between top-line results while maintaining and incrementally improving margin | |
| | | ■ | ASV Growth and Adjusted Operating Margin have been consistently used as key measures in FactSet’s business and financial plan | |
■ | NEOs to be measured on company-wide financial results
| | ■ | NEOs can often have the greatest impact on company-wide results
| executives' control |
2021 Proxy Statement 37
Core Elements of Total Direct Compensation
In making compensation decisions, the Compensation and Talent Committee has sought to reinforce the correlation between
the Company’sFactSet’s performance and executive compensation. The Compensation and Talent Committee has designed the executive compensation program to motivate, retain, engage and appropriately reward our executive officers. Individual compensation levels for NEOs are based on
theFactSet's collective
Companyand strategic workflow operating performance
including ASV and Adjusted Operating Margin, and individual performance toward executing FactSet’s strategy, accelerating growth, and contributing to company-wide results. By encouraging NEOs to strive for outstanding individual and team performances, they are expected in turn to drive the positive performance of
the CompanyFactSet as a whole.
The core elements of our NEOs’ compensation package consist of base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive, which we
collectively refer to as
Total"Total Direct Compensation.
" Incentive awards are composed of a mix of annual
incentiveincentives in the form of cash and
long-term incentive equity grants,
in the form ofwhich may include stock
options.options, performance share units, and restricted share units. Taken together, Total Direct Compensation is tied to performance and closely linked to long-term growth,
achievement of financial objectives, and stock price appreciation.
The goal is to ensure that Total Direct Compensation packages generally remain competitive with the 50th percentile when compared to peer group companies.
Total
Compensation
Element
| Pay
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Compensation Element | Payment Form | Performance Measure | Strategy & Performance Alignment |
Base Salary | Cash | ■ | Base salaries are intended
•Intended to be competitive to attract and retain key employees | ■ | The Compensation and Talent Committee reviews salaries
•Reviewed on an annual basis and makes periodic adjustmentsis periodically adjusted to base salarybe based on individual performance and contributions, market trends, and competitive position. The Compensation and Talent Committee does not use aposition
•There is no formula to review base salaries, and no one factor wasis weighted more heavily than another
|
| Annual Incentive | Cash |
Company Performance (80%(90%) •For corporate leadership, ASV plus Professional Services Growth and Adjusted Operating Margin •For strategic workflow heads, ASV plus Professional Services Growth and Adjusted Operating Margin on a company-wide level, plus strategic workflow financial performance •Minimum level of performance required for financial component of annual incentive Individual Goals (10%) •Key goals established for each NEO | ■ |
•Rewards and recognizes annual accomplishment of key financial objectives |
| | ■ | ASV Growth | ■ |
•Performance measures aligned with the Company’sFactSet’s growth, |
| | ■ | Adjusted Operating Margin | ■ | Circuit breaker requires minimum level of both on a company-wide and strategic workflow basis
•Specified performance achievements required to fund incentive payments. If ASVone or more components of performance does not reach the threshold level, some or all of the financial target portion of the annual incentive would not be paid to NEOs unless the Compensation and Talent Committee were to do so in its discretion |
Annual Incentive | Cash-based
award
| ■ | Circuit Breaker – minimum level of ASV performance required for financial component of annual incentive | |
| | Individual Goals (20%) | ■ | •Key individual goals are within the NEO’s area of responsibility and assessed annually
|
38 2021 Proxy Statement
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ■ | Key goals established for each NEO | | |
Long-Term Incentives | Stock Options | ■ | •Stock price | ■ |
•Increases alignment with stockholder interests
•Promotes an ownership mindset, |
| | ■ | as the awards can greatly increase in value as long as there is stock price appreciation
•NEOs only benefit if our stock price appreciates from the date of grant of the award
•Five-year vesting period encourages retention and long-term horizon
|
| Long-Term Incentives | Performance Share Units | ■Company Performance •Adjusted Cumulative Operating Earnings •Adjusted Cumulative Revenues
Stock Price | Encourages•Rewards and recognizes accomplishment of key financial objectives over a three-year period corresponding to FactSet's current three-year plan
•Performance measures aligned with FactSet’s growth
•Aligns with stockholder interests as the awards can greatly increase in value when there is stock price appreciation |
| Long-Term Incentives | Restricted Share Units | •Stock price |
•Increases alignment with stockholder interests
•Promotes an ownership mindset, as the awards can greatly increase in value when there is stock price appreciation
•Three to five year vesting period encourages retention of NEOsand long-term horizon
|
Significant Percentage of Executive Pay is at Risk
Since executive compensation is delivered principally in the form of annual and long-term incentive awards, a significant portion of executive pay is at risk and dependent on our future Company performance. All the
Our long-term incentive awards
in the form of stock options derive value directly from
the Company’sprice appreciation in our common stock,
price appreciation, which is, in most respects, a reflection of
Companyour performance and directly linked to stockholder returns. The stock option awards have no value if our common stock price does not appreciate prior to expiration of the stock options.
Our long-term incentive awards in the form of performance share units derive value only when we achieve the specified performance goals required for the performance share units to vest. Achievement of these goals reflects successful company performance furthering FactSet's long-term strategy and is indirectly linked to stockholder returns. The performance share units
2021 Proxy Statement 39
have no value if we do not achieve the threshold performance targets specified in the performance share unit grants and have increased value if our common stock price appreciates and if actual performance exceeds target performance levels.
Our long-term incentive awards in the form of restricted share units derive value from the value of our common stock, especially from price appreciation in our common stock, which is, in most respects, a reflection of our performance and directly linked to stockholder returns. Our restricted share units have increased value if our common stock price appreciates.
The below pay mix charts represent the proportion of target
total direct compensationTotal Direct Compensation for our NEOs in fiscal 2021 attributed to base salary, target annual incentive opportunity, and target long-term
incentives.incentives, including stock options, performance share units and restricted share units. The pay mix chart for NEOs represents the average
target pay mix for the NEOs reported
below in
the summary compensation tableour Summary Compensation Table who were employed for the full
2021 fiscal year.
Compensation Governance Features
We employ several best practice sound compensation governance policies and practices. Below is a summary of “what we do” and “what we don’t do” in terms of compensation governance.
2018
Fiscal 2021 Policies and Practices
What we do:
| What we don’t do:
|
| |
■ | Significant alignment between pay and performance
| ■ | No employment contracts for NEOs
|
■ | Quantitative Company performance measure | ■ | No officer hedging or pledging of Company stock |
■ | Clawback policy | ■ | No corporate aircraft |
■ | Annual risk assessment of pay programs and structure | ■ | No excise tax gross up |
■ | Annual say-on-pay vote | ■ | No “evergreen” annual share increase provision in the Company’s equity stock plans |
■ | Double-trigger change in control vesting provisions | ■ | No repricing of stock options and stock appreciation rights |
| | ■ | No discount from fair market value
Pay is permitted in setting the exercise price of stock options |
Pay-for-Performance Alignment
| ■
| Average NEO Total Compensation represents average total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for all NEOs that were designated as NEOs in each of the 2016, 2017, and 2018 fiscal years and were employed by FactSet for each of these full fiscal years (this includes Messrs. Snow, Nicolelli, and Baker-Greene).
|
| ■
| Average Growth in NEO Total Compensation represents the compound annual growth rate ("CAGR").
|
| ■
| Total Shareholder Return is calculated as of FactSet's fiscal year ended August 31, 2018 and represents the CAGR.
|
Pay not only based on current operating results, but also rewards for progress towards future growth.
growth
A substantial portion of NEO compensation is subject to achieving both short-term and long-term performance objectives that enhance stockholder value. FactSet is focused on ASV plus Professional Services Growth and Adjusted Operating Margin for our annual plan metrics. ASV plus Professional Services Growth is reflective of future sustainable performance and is a strong indicator of growth over the long term. Adjusted Operating Margin is reflective of profitable growth on a going forward basis.
Cash incentive compensation rewards annual (short-term) performance, while equity-based compensation promotes an ownership mindset (long-term).
Equity-based compensation, specifically stock options, represents a significant portion of total compensation. With stock options, NEOs only benefit if our stock price appreciates from the date of grant of the award. The Compensation and Talent Committee has viewed options as a method, not only of encouraging the NEOs to drive Company performance in the long-term, but also of encouraging the retention of officers through an option vesting schedule. While there are currently no minimum stock ownership requirements for any NEO, NEOs’ interests as stockholders and option holders have been aligned in the past with those of stockholders due in part to the large share ownership such officers have an opportunity to build or have maintained. The allocation between annual incentive compensation and long-term equity compensation is based primarily on an evaluation of an executive’s overall role and contributions to
the Company,FactSet, taking into account competitive practices.
Equity-based compensation, specifically stock options, performance share units and restricted share units, represents a significant portion of total compensation for our NEOs. With stock options, NEOs only benefit if our stock price appreciates from the date of grant of the award. With performance share units, NEOs will derive value only if the threshold performance metrics established in the performance share unit award are satisfied and will receive increased value if our common stock price appreciates. With restricted share units, NEOs benefit more if the price of our common stock increases over the vesting period. The Compensation and Talent
40 2021 Proxy Statement
Committee has viewed options as a method, not only of encouraging the NEOs to drive performance in the long-term, but also of encouraging the retention of executives through the five-year option vesting schedule, which is longer than typical market practice.
The interests of NEOs as owners of stock and holders of long-term equity awards have been aligned in the past with those of stockholders due in part to the large share ownership such executives already maintained or have an opportunity to build. Our introduction in fiscal 2021 of stock ownership guidelines that apply to our NEOs and certain other covered executives are intended to further this alignment between our NEOs and our stockholders. We performed our first compliance calculation under the stock ownership guidelines as of February 1, 2021, and informed our NEOs and other covered executives of the status of their holdings relative to these guidelines at that time. We will continue to do this assessment annually to assist our NEOs and other covered executives in meeting their ownership and holding guidelines. See "Stock Ownership and Holding Guidelines" below.
Total compensation packages for different roles that balance external market pay with an internal
framework.framework
Total compensation packages are established by balancing external market pay with an internal framework considering each employee's
contribution.contribution and a focus on collaboration. The Compensation and Talent Committee determines
annual compensation and
annual stock-based incentive awards for the NEOs
atduring the same time
asframe that it approves
annual award pools for
the CompanyFactSet as a whole. For NEOs, compensation includes cash elements which are targeted to be
relatively in line with the market and equity opportunities that can be worth substantially more as we grow and outperform the competition or internal plans.
Defined qualitative factors beyond the quantitative financial
metrics.The Compensation and Talent Committee reviewsmetrics
In addition to the
individual goals offinancial metrics in the annual incentive plan, each NEO
atalso has non-financial objectives that are set every year and focus the
end of each fiscal year to determine the executive’s performance relative to stated objectives, which include qualitative factors in addition to quantitative metrics.NEO’s efforts on specific business needs. These objectives may include
leadership, talent development, commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion, sustainability efforts, special assignments, project management, governance objectives,
visibility and engagement in global offices,
and exposure to employees, key clients, investors and
analysts.analysts, and other specific individual performance objectives. The NEO’s achievement of certain goal levels as well as other accomplishments made during the year guide and influence
with the
application of some discretion by the Compensation and Talent Committee, that NEO’s
salary, target annual incentive and equity
award for the fiscal year just completed, and salary levels for the coming fiscal year.award.
Attract and retain talented
personnel.personnel
We operate in several highly competitive labor markets and must ensure that
our total compensation
package compares well with that offered by competitors in those markets. The Compensation and Talent Committee has designed executive compensation bearing in mind the compensation offered by other companies in the technology and financial information industry, to the extent such information is publicly available.
Decision-Making Process
Role of the Compensation and Talent Committee, Management, and Compensation Consultant
The Compensation and Talent Committee is responsible for reviewing and making decisions about executive policies and plans, including the amount of base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive awarded to the NEOs, in accordance with FactSet’s established compensation philosophy. In addition, the Compensation and Talent Committee is responsible for administering the compensation plans in accordance with these objectives, strategy, and philosophy. In this process, the Compensation and Talent Committee evaluates information provided by its independent compensation consultant (Farient), our CEO, and other members of FactSet management. The Compensation and Talent Committee evaluates and approves various topics on an annual or as-needed basis, including, but not limited to, compensation levels and mix, compensation plan design, executive performance versus the plan, peer group, succession planning, and risk assessment.
In fiscal 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee continued to engage Farient as its independent compensation consultant. Farient, our CEO, and other FactSet executives assist the Compensation and Talent Committee from time to time in its evaluation of compensation elements or program design by providing analysis, industry benchmarking information, historical information, year-over-year comparisons and clarifications regarding job duties and performance. Management also prepares reports that include, but are not limited to, topics such as succession planning, plan performance, annual objectives and goals, and other
2021 Proxy Statement 41
compensation practices. In fiscal 2021, Farient did an analysis of the peer group, compensation levels for the CEO (e.g., competitiveness of base salary, annual incentive, and long-term incentives), as well as incentive program design (e.g., annual incentive program targets and measures, long-term incentive plan targets, compensation methods, and performance measures).
FactSet has not entered into any employment agreements with our CEO or any of our NEOs and, as such, FactSet is not bound by any contractual salary, incentive grants or other compensation requirements for our CEO or any of our NEOs except for the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Executive Severance Plan. See "Executive Severance Plan and Equity Award Agreements" below. Perquisites have historically constituted a very small portion of each NEO’s total compensation, primarily representing the dollar value of matching contributions to the FactSet 401(k) Plan made by FactSet on behalf of each NEO.
Performance Evaluation
The CEO’s performance is reviewed annually by the Compensation and Talent Committee and the full Board and informs all pay decisions. The CEO annually reviews the performance of each executive officer who reports to him, including the NEOs. The Compensation and Talent Committee and CEO identify appropriate performance measures and propose performance objectives that are used in determining annual and long-term awards. More specifically, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviews materials outlining the individual performance of each executive officer reporting to the CEO, including the NEOs, with respect to their goals and objectives for the past year, measured against financial goals for FactSet’s performance as well as quantitative performance in the individual executive’s functional area. Management also provides the Compensation and Talent Committee with materials regarding the overall financial performance of FactSet as well as operational and strategic accomplishments during the fiscal year that are all evaluated to determine the amount of the annual incentive awarded.
Peer Group Review
The Compensation and Talent Committee is provided executive compensation data of similarly situated NEOs at companies determined to be comparable to FactSet by the Compensation and Talent Committee.
For fiscal 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee utilized a peer group that was selected based on criteria including companies that reflect FactSet’s industry, business focus, size and global presence. The peer screening also incorporated a focus on good corporate governance practices. The peer group utilized by the Compensation and Talent Committee for fiscal 2021 was identical to the peer group used by the Committee for fiscal 2020.
| | | | | | | | |
| Peer Companies: | | |
| Black Knight, Inc. | IHS Markit Ltd. 2 |
| Core Logic, Inc. 1 | Morningstar, Inc. |
| CoStar Group, Inc. | MSCI, Inc. |
| Envestnet, Inc. | RealPage, Inc. 3 |
| Equifax, Inc. | Splunk Inc. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation | TransUnion |
| Gartner Inc. | Verisk Analytics, Inc. |
1.Core Logic, Inc. was acquired by funds managed by Stone Point Capital and Insight Partners in June 2021 and is no longer a public company.
2.IHS Markit Ltd. announced in November 2020 that it intends to merge with S&P Global. According to IHS Markit, the transaction is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2021.
3.RealPage, Inc. was acquired by Thoma Bravo, a private equity investment firm, in April 2021 and is no longer a public company.
42 2021 Proxy Statement
The following table indicates the revenue for the last completed fiscal year for FactSet and each of the companies in our peer group, as well as the market capitalization of FactSet and each peer company as of August 31, 2021 (the conclusion of our fiscal 2021 year).
| | | | | | | | |
| Name* | Most Recent FY Revenue (in $ millions) | Market Cap as of 8/31/2021
(in $ millions) |
| IHS Markit Ltd. | 4,287.80 | 48,072.64 |
| Equifax Inc. | 4,127.50 | 33,171.42 |
| Gartner, Inc. | 4,099.40 | 25,825.71 |
| Verisk Analytics Inc | 2,784.60 | 32,554.07 |
| TransUnion | 2,716.60 | 23,272.99 |
| Splunk Inc. | 2,229.39 | 25,058.05 |
| MSCI Inc. Class A | 1,695.39 | 52,316.23 |
| CoStar Group, Inc. | 1,659.02 | 33,468.50 |
| FactSet Research Systems Inc. | 1,591.45 | 14,241.69 |
| Morningstar, Inc. | 1,389.50 | 11,541.41 |
| Fair Isaac Corporation | 1,294.56 | 13,050.72 |
| Black Knight, Inc. | 1,238.50 | 11,852.19 |
| Envestnet, Inc. | 998.23 | 4,354.14 |
•Core Logic, Inc. and RealPage, Inc. are not included in this table as neither was a public company on August 31, 2021.
The Compensation and Talent Committee continually reviews the total target compensation for our NEOs against that of comparable executives of our peer group companies. When considering peer compensation levels, the Compensation and Talent Committee focuses on Total Direct Compensation comparisons, and continues to emphasize long-term equity. We believe that our pay mix is reflective of our goals of retaining top talent and aligning executives' interests with stockholder returns.
Additionally, the Compensation and Talent Committee utilized a reference peer group for compensation and governance practices for fiscal 2021 that includes companies that meet the peer group criteria but are larger than the peer group revenue range and are therefore not included in compensation level assessments. The reference peer group utilized by the Compensation and Talent Committee for fiscal 2021 was identical to the reference peer group used by the Committee for fiscal 2020. The reference peer group consists of:
| | | | | | | | |
| Reference Peer Companies: | | |
| Broadridge Financial Solutions | Nasdaq |
| Fidelity National Information Services | S&P Global |
| Intercontinental Exchange | Thomson Reuters |
| Moody's Corporation | |
Compiled Benchmark Data
Farient and FactSet management prepare benchmarking and competitive data with respect to historical compensation and our defined peer group and surveys of other companies. The Compensation and Talent Committee utilizes this information in connection with establishing NEO compensation programs and parameters. In determining fiscal 2021 compensation, the Compensation and Talent Committee was provided executive compensation data of similarly situated NEOs at the companies making up the identified peer group and surveys of other companies with respect to the compensation provided to the NEOs. The materials presented to the Compensation and Talent Committee detailed the compensation by type, including salary, annual incentive and equity awards.
2021 Proxy Statement 43
Compensation Approvals
The Compensation and Talent Committee reviews materials detailing the historical salary, annual incentive, total cash, equity awards and total compensation levels of our CEO, the other NEOs and other senior members of management who report directly to the CEO. The conclusions reached and recommendations made are based on performance reviews, including with respect to salary adjustments and annual and long-term incentive awards that are presented to the Compensation and Talent Committee for approval. The Compensation and Talent Committee then makes its determination as to the annual incentive, equity awards, and base salary. Management does not participate in this deliberation and the CEO is not present for discussions regarding his own compensation. During the same time frame, the Compensation and Talent Committee approves the total annual incentive and equity award pools for our operational areas as a whole, so that compensation to the NEOs is made in the larger context of compensation for all FactSet employees.
Elements of Compensation and
Fiscal 2021 Performance
Our executive compensation program works to embed the goals and principles explained above across the various elements of compensation. The three major elements of executive officer compensation in fiscal
2018 continued to be: | ■
| Variable cash incentive awards (annual incentive); and
|
| ■
| Long-term, equity-based incentive awards.
|
2021 were:
•Base salary;
•Annual cash incentive awards; and
•Long-term, equity-based incentive awards consisting of:
◦Stock option awards; and
◦Performance share unit awards.
Base salaries are intended to be sufficiently competitive to attract and retain key employees. The Compensation and Talent Committee reviews salaries on an annual basis and makes periodic adjustments to base salary based on individual performance and contributions, market trends, competitive position, recommendations of the CEO for his direct reports, and FactSet’s financial situation. The Compensation and Talent Committee diddoes not use a fixed formula to review base salaries. The goal is to ensure that total cash compensation packages (including base salaries, annual incentives, and annuallong-term incentives of the NEOs) generally remain competitive with the 50th percentile when compared to peer group companies.
Based on this review and the continued implementation of the recommendations arising from the comprehensive executive officer total compensation market review discussed above in "Fiscal 2021 Compensation Structure and Incentive Program Changes," the Compensation and Talent Committee concluded that the base salary structure for our NEOs needed to be revised for fiscal 2021 to be competitive with our peers and the market for similarly situated executives. The comprehensive executive officer total compensation market review indicated that our NEO base salary levels were significantly below those of our peers. Accordingly, base salaries for fiscal 2021 for our NEOs were increased as set out below. The fiscal 2021 increases bring our NEOs salaries closer to the midpoint of the comparable market-competitive range and allows us the ability to better attract and retain talent. In addition, the changes are intended to establish differentiation among our various NEOs based on individual role, scope and performance expectations. The increases in NEO salaries are also aimed at eliminating salary compression for employees below the executive level. As described below under "Annual Incentives," we implemented a corresponding reduction to our annual incentive plan target payments as a percentage of base salary for NEOs to limit the overall increase in Total Direct Compensation of our NEOs.
44 2021 Proxy Statement
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| NEO | 2020 Base Salary | 2021 Base Salary | Percentage Change |
| F. Philip Snow | $ | 530,000.00 | | $ | 650,000.00 | | 22.6 | % |
| Helen L. Shan | $ | 425,000.00 | | $ | 475,000.00 | | 11.8 | % |
| Goran Skoko | $ | 350,000.00 | | $ | 375,000.00 | | 7.1 | % |
| Gene D. Fernandez | $ | 375,000.00 | | $ | 400,000.00 | | 6.7 | % |
| Rachel R. Stern | $ | 350,000.00 | | $ | 375,000.00 | | 7.1 | % |
The Compensation and Talent Committee has designed an annual cash incentive program to stimulate and support a high-performance environment by focusing such incentive compensation on the attainment of qualitative and quantitative guidelines and by recognizing superior performance. Each NEO hadhas objectives that wereare established during the year (or near the date of beginning in the current role) and reviewed with the NEO. Annual Company-levelcompany-level and operational-focused performance goals, as appropriate, serve both to motivate executives, as well as toenhance collaboration and increase stockholder returns by focusing executive performance on those measures identified as having a positive impact onbeing key drivers of our short and long-term business results. For
As described above under "Base Salary," we increased the base salary levels for our NEOs for fiscal 2018, 80%2021. In connection with this, we also implemented a reduction to our annual incentive plan payment targets as a percentage of base salary for fiscal 2021 for our NEOs to accommodate the fiscal 2021 increases in base salary, with the goal of keeping our overall NEO short-term compensation relatively consistent at target levels of fiscal 2021 performance.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NEO | 2020 Total Annual Incentive Opportunity | 2021 Total Annual Incentive Opportunity | Percentage Change in Total Annual Incentive Opportunity | 2020 Total Annual Incentive Opportunity as a percentage of 2020 Base Salary | 2021 Total Annual Incentive Opportunity as a percentage of 2021 Base Salary | Change in Total Annual Incentive Opportunity as a percentage of Base Salary |
| F. Philip Snow | $ | 1,060,000.00 | | $ | 975,000.00 | | (8.0) | % | 200 | % | 150 | % | (25.0) | % |
| Helen L. Shan | $ | 450,000.00 | | $ | 450,000.00 | | — | % | 106 | % | 95 | % | (11.0) | % |
| Goran Skoko | $ | 400,000.00 | | $ | 400,000.00 | | — | % | 114 | % | 107 | % | (7.0) | % |
| Gene D. Fernandez | $ | 425,000.00 | | $ | 425,000.00 | | — | % | 113 | % | 106 | % | (6.0) | % |
| Rachel R. Stern | $ | 400,000.00 | | $ | 400,000.00 | | — | % | 114 | % | 107 | % | (7.0) | % |
During fiscal 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee made revisions to certain elements of our annual cash incentive program:
•We revised the payment percentages for performance at threshold (50%) and stretch (150%) levels of performance for all members of our management team to create a broader range of potential payout than in past years. By comparison, the potential payments in the fiscal 2020 annual cash incentive program ranged from 75% at threshold to 125% at stretch.
•We reduced the individual performance component of the NEO’sannual cash incentive program from 20% to 10% with the purpose of increasing focus on teamwork and corporate objectives. For corporate executives, this was accompanied by an increase in the Company performance component from 80% to 90%. For strategic workflow executives, the Company performance component was decreased from 50% to 45% of the annual cash incentive target and the strategic workflow component was increased from 30% to 45% of the target, with the goal of driving increased focus on the performance areas most within the executives' control.
2021 Proxy Statement 45
•We raised the relative weight of ASV plus Professional Services Growth, and lowered the relative weight of Adjusted Operating Margin, in measuring the performance component of the annual cash incentive program.
With respect to the portion of the annual incentive
award that was
focused on two financial targets, Organicattributed to company-wide ASV
plus Professional Services Growth and Adjusted Operating Margin
with specific weightings(90% for
each as shown incorporate management, 45% for strategic workflow management), the
table below.2018 Annual Incentive Program Guidelines – NEOs
Measures | | Weighting | | | Base Performance | | | Target Performance | | | Stretch Performance | |
Organic ASV Growth | | | 50% | | | $ | 60M | | | $ | 75M | | | $ | 90M | |
Adjusted Operating Margin | | | 30% | | | | 31.5% | | | | 32.0% | | | | 32.5% | |
Key Goals (Individual) | | | 20% | | | Base Rating | | | Target Rating | | | Stretch Rating | |
Annual incentive program was funded by a minimum level of FactSet ASV Growth performance of $60 million. The program specified that if ASV did not grow by $60 million, there would be no incentive payment based onfiscal 2021 financial results for those measures were compared against the financial componentgoals established at the beginning of the year and further adjusted during fiscal 2021 to take into account acquisitions made by FactSet during the fiscal year. The ASV plus Professional Services Growth metrics for fiscal 2021 (threshold, target and stretch) were above those set for our 2020 fiscal year annual incentive program unless the Committee exercises its discretion to award one. Inplan, reflecting our expectations for improved growth during fiscal 2018, the $60 million threshold was met2021.
For fiscal 2021, we once again used ASV plus Professional Services Growth and Adjusted Operating Margin as the
Company achieved Organic ASVcompany-wide metrics for our annual incentive plan. These metrics maintain a focus on growth,
of $74.4 million.with a balance between responsible growth and maintaining efficiency. ASV at any given point in time represents the forward-looking revenues for the next twelve months from all subscription services currently supplied to clients and excludesincludes professional services fees billed in the last 12 months, whichtwelve months. Professional Services are not subscription-based. ASV growth is the difference between ASV at fiscal 2017 year endrevenues derived from project-based consulting and ASV at fiscal 2018 year end.implementation. Adjusted Operating Margin is calculated as adjustedAdjusted operating income divided by the sum of GAAP revenuesrevenue plus the deferredDeferred revenue fair value adjustment. Adjusted operating income is calculated by adding GAAP Operating income, Intangible asset amortization, Deferred revenue fair value adjustment, Impairment of investment and Other one-time items. These measures are publicly reported in our financial results.
The
For fiscal 2021, for members of strategic workflow management, a substantial component (45%) of their annual incentive plan was attributable to the performance of their respective strategic workflow solutions. Each strategic workflow was assigned a specific ASV plus Professional Services Growth and budget target at the beginning of the fiscal 2021 year, each of which varied by strategic workflows and was aligned with FactSet's overall financial plan. At year end, the fiscal 2021 financial performance was compared against the goals established at the beginning of the year. As Mr. Skoko was responsible for both a strategic workflow solution (Wealth Solutions) and a geographic area (EMEA and Asia Pacific), 45% of his annual incentive plan was attributable to the performance of the Wealth Solutions strategic workflow and 45% was attributable to the performance of our International operations in EMEA and Asia Pacific.
The fiscal 2021 annual incentive program also included an individual component for each NEO. For fiscal 2021, 10% of the annual incentive award for each NEO was based on the financial guidelines would have been 0% if the minimum level had not been met (absent a decision otherwise by the Compensation and Talent Committee). IfCommittee’s subjective evaluation of the minimum is met, the guidelines would indicate a total annual incentive award rangeexecutives’ achievement of 50%qualitative individual goals and other personal accomplishments set out in materials provided to 150% in the case of Mr. Snow, from 60% to 165% in the case of Mr. Wiseman, and from 80% to 125% in the case of Messrs. Fernandez, Baker-Greene and Nicolelli. The variance in the ranges among the NEOs reflect the differences among their individual job functions, with those having roles that could have greater impact on Company-wide results having greater variance compared to those serving in a corporate function with relatively less ability to impact overall financial results significantly. The goals are guidelines to help guide the Compensation and Talent Committee in determining the NEO’s cash incentive award forby management. The 10% individual component of the fiscal 2018. 2021 annual incentive program reflects a decrease from the 20% weighting of individual metrics in the fiscal 2020 program structure, as the Compensation and Talent Committee intended for NEOs to increase their focus on teamwork and corporate objectives in fiscal 2021.
The amountCompensation and Talent Committee agreed on the NEOs’ performance and related compensation through discussions with the CEO and in conjunction with its review of the performance of FactSet as a whole. The Compensation and Talent Committee determined the actual size of annual incentive payments awarded to each of the NEOs.
46 2021 Proxy Statement
For fiscal 2021, the annual incentive goals and actual performance against these goals for corporate leadership (including Mr. Snow, Ms. Shan, Mr. Fernandez and Ms. Stern) were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Measures | Weighting | Elements of Measurement | Base
Performance | Target
Performance | Stretch
Performance | Actual
Performance |
| Corporate Performance | 90% | ASV + Professional Services Growth (67%) | $63.3M | $90.4M | $117.4M | $115.1M |
| Adjusted Operating Margin (33%) | 30.6% | 32.3% | 34.0% | 32.5% |
| Key Goals (Individual) | 10% | | Base Rating | Target Rating | Stretch Rating | Varies |
| Payout as a Percent of Target | | | 50% | 100% | 150% | |
In fiscal 2021, FactSet achieved ASV plus Professional Services Growth of $115.1 million and Adjusted Operating Margin of 32.5% and, as a result, 132.7% of the annual incentive award based on corporate performance was paid out.
For fiscal 2021, the annual incentive goals for Mr. Skoko and actual performance against these goals were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Measures | Weighting | Elements of Measurement | Base
Performance | Target
Performance | Stretch
Performance | Actual
Performance |
| International Performance | 45% | ASV + Professional Services Growth | Threshold International Performance | Target International Performance | Stretch International Performance | 119% of Target Performance |
| Wealth Solutions Strategic Workflow Performance | 45% | ASV + Professional Services Growth & Budget Target | Threshold Workflow Performance | Target Workflow Performance | Stretch Workflow Performance | 115% of Target Performance |
| Key Goals (Individual) | 10% | | Base Rating | Target Rating | Stretch Rating | |
| Payout as a Percent of Target | | | 50% | 100% | 150% | |
Based on this evaluation, 117% of the annual incentive award based on strategic workflow performance was paid out to Mr. Skoko.
The Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed the personal goals for each NEO, as well as individual accomplishments of each NEO, in determining the total annual incentive relating to the 10% of the annual incentive award based on satisfaction of key goals. All of our NEOs have as part of their individual goals to champion diversity, equity and inclusion at FactSet. In addition, the fiscal 2021 individual goals of each NEO were as follows:
•Mr. Snow’s goals: Deliver financial performance in line with the stretch performance goals approved by the Board, including developing plans early in the fiscal year to credibly achieve these goals; continue to strengthen the FactSet executive team, including completing the search for a new Chief Revenue Officer ("CRO") to revitalize sales operations; and execute on go to market plans based on the new capabilities created from the significant investments made over the past several years.
2021 Proxy Statement 47
•Ms. Shan's goals: Chair the Company's Operating Committee; drive key operational and transformation programs; execute on FactSet's Pricing Program; play an active role in establishing strategy and growth initiatives; and transition into the CRO role.
•Mr. Skoko's goals: Drive the Advisor Dashboard initiative, placing an advisor’s entire book of business at their fingertips, supporting management of portfolios at scale; create a seamless process for wholesalers in asset management firms to offer models to prospects of advisors; and meet rising need for risk oversight within Wealth Management.
•Mr. Fernandez’s goals: Reimagine the content collection process with an automation-first approach; build an industry-leading digital foundation that reduces time to market for new products and growth at scale; partner within the organization to develop innovations that drive adoption among clients; and support the enterprise hosting SOC 2 certification.
•Ms. Stern's goals: Execute on duties as Chief Legal Officer; lead real estate strategy; provide oversight and administration of Centers of Excellence; and support the enterprise hosting SOC 2 certification.
In addition, for Ms. Shan and Mr. Skoko, the Compensation and Talent Committee took into consideration that, in addition to their roles at the start of fiscal 2021, when their financial targets and individual goals were set, they each assumed substantial additional duties and responsibilities during the year. Mr. Skoko oversaw our Sales function for a large portion of the year, in addition to his responsibility for our Wealth Solutions strategic workflow and our International operations. Ms. Shan then took on the responsibility for our Sales function, in addition to her Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") duties, when she assumed the role of CRO in May 2021.
The Compensation and Talent Committee considered all the above, including the financial results for the target measures, the financial guidelines, represents 80%the recommendations and evaluation by the CEO of the total target bonus opportunity. The remaining balance of 20% is based onother NEOs, the achievement of the NEO’s key individual goals and other personal accomplishments, and overall FactSet performance for the 2021 fiscal year. Using this total mix of information, the Committee made the following awards for the NEOs for fiscal 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Annual Incentive Opportunity | Total Annual Incentive Percentage Awarded | Total Annual Incentive Paid |
| F. Philip Snow | $ | 975,000.00 | | 135% | $ | 1,320,000.00 | |
| Helen L. Shan | $ | 450,000.00 | | 139% | $ | 625,000.00 | |
| Goran Skoko | $ | 400,000.00 | | 125% | $ | 500,000.00 | |
| Gene D. Fernandez | $ | 425,000.00 | | 128% | $ | 545,000.00 | |
| Rachel R. Stern | $ | 400,000.00 | | 129% | $ | 517,000.00 | |
For Mr. Snow, the Compensation and Talent Committee’s decision was based in part on its review of FactSet's strong fiscal 2021 financial performance, including that
are proposed byASV plus Professional Services Growth exceeded target expectations. The Committee also evaluated Mr. Snow's overall leadership of the
CEOFactSet organization. The Committee put an emphasis on: Mr. Snow's continuing to drive high levels of employee engagement, even as the Company's employees largely continued to work remotely; his bolstering the leadership of the Company and
approved by the Committee.building a team of diverse talent; and his shaping FactSet's culture with an emphasis on accountability, execution and inclusion.
Long-Term Incentive
Long-term, Equity-based Incentive Awards
A significant portion of total compensation tofor each NEO is long-term incentive compensation, which consists of stock options.long-term, equity-based incentive compensation. The Compensation and Talent Committee determines the types and size of the long-term, equity-based incentives according to each NEO’s position within FactSet, competitive benchmarking, performance and contributions to the Company.FactSet. Our philosophy is built on the principles that equity compensation should seek to align employees’executives' actions with stockholder interests; attract, retain, and motivate highly qualified executives; and balance the focus on short and longer-term performance objectives. The Compensation and Talent Committee believes that it has been successful in achieving this alignment through the use of stock options for NEOs. The Compensation and Talent Committee takes into accountconsiders each NEO’s performance history, his or her potential for future advancement, the CEO’s recommendations for awards (other than histhe CEO's own) and the value of existing vested and unvested outstanding equity awards.awards in making its determination. The relative weight given to each of these factors varies among individuals at the Compensation and Talent Committee’s discretion. The equity-based plan awards are typically granted after the end of each fiscal year in order to be synchronized with the year-end performance review process and the timing of the annual incentive payments.
48 2021 Proxy Statement
For fiscal 2018, 2021, the following values were established for grantslong-term, equity-based incentive awards issued as part of our annual equity grant to our NEOs consisted of stock options for the NEOs:Name | | Stock Options Grant Value | |
F. Philip Snow | | $ | 1,500,000 | |
Gene Fernandez | | $ | 750,000 | |
John W. Wiseman | | $ | 375,000 | |
Maurizio Nicolelli | | $ | 375,000 | |
Edward Baker-Greene | | $ | 300,000 | |
The exercise price for all optionsand performance share unit awards, with each NEO being granted was the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.
Tax Considerations
In establishing individual executives’ compensation levels, the Company does not explicitly consider accounting and tax issues. The Company’s tax deduction for compensation paid to each of the NEOs who are subject to the compensation limits of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code is capped at $1 million per NEO. Section 162(m) provided an exemption from the $1 million cap for compensation that qualified as “performance-based.” The intention was for our a
long-term incentive award programs for NEOs to qualify for that exemption. For the fiscal years presented in this Proxy Statement, FactSet believed that the stock-based awards granted under ourcomprised of 50% service-based stock optionoptions and award plan met the requirements for “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) at the time of grant. Our annual incentive cash award did not meet the requirements. However, on December 20, 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which repealed the exception for performance-based compensation from the Section 162(m) limitation. This repeal is effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Thus, compensation paid to our NEOs in excess of $1.0 million in fiscal year 2019 will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. The repeal means that even performance-based compensation will be subject to the Section 162(m) limitation. Due to some uncertainties around the application and interpretation of the repeal of the performance-based exception of Section 162(m) to current awards, certain amounts of compensation may fail to be deductible under Section 162(m), even if such compensation was intended to satisfy the requirements for deductibility. This change to the tax law will have an impact on Section 162(m) going forward, and we will monitor the impact of these changes. 50% performance share units. The Compensation and Talent Committee has traditionally utilized stock option grants as its primary long-term, equity-based incentive tool, and believes that these have been generally successful in aligning management and stockholder interests. However, with FactSet's focus on implementing its three-year strategic business plan, the Compensation and Talent Committee felt that it was appropriate to include a form of award that was more closely correlated to this time frame and would align our senior leaders with the specific corporate goals related to this critical three-year strategic plan.
The performance share units tie our executives to our long-term financial goals, which are key drivers of long-term sustainable stockholder value. We anticipate that the performance share units will provide greater transparency for plan participants as well as for stockholders. The long-term incentive program should provide a strong balance between stock options and performance share units, effectively creating line-of-sight to drivers of value and value creation overall. In addition, the Compensation and Talent Committee felt that inclusion of the performance share unit awards was a way to incorporate a form of performance-based equity award to our overall compensation package. The Compensation and Talent Committee believed that providing a mix of options and performance share units at this time was the most effective way to promote equity ownership by the NEOs, reward them for solid operating performance and provide a retention incentive.
The value of the long-term incentive awards granted to each NEO in fiscal 2021 were greater than those awarded to our NEOs in fiscal 2020. The Compensation and Talent Committee felt that an increase in long-term incentive awards was the most appropriate method to fill a competitive total compensation gap between FactSet and the market, particularly when the long-term incentives being awarded incorporated a substantial performance-based component in the past reservedform of the performance share units.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| NEO | 2020 Total Long Term Incentive Opportunity | 2021 Total Long Term Incentive Opportunity1 | Percentage Change |
| F. Philip Snow | $ | 3,000,000.00 | | $ | 3,500,000.00 | | 16.7 | % |
| Helen L. Shan | $ | 1,200,000.00 | | $ | 1,350,000.00 | | 12.5 | % |
| Goran Skoko | $ | 600,000.00 | | $ | 700,000.00 | | 16.7 | % |
| Gene D. Fernandez | $ | 600,000.00 | | $ | 700,000.00 | | 16.7 | % |
| Rachel R. Stern | $ | 600,000.00 | | $ | 700,000.00 | | 16.7 | % |
1.Total long-term incentive opportunity for 2021 consists of 50% service-based stock options and 50% performance share units.
Stock Option Awards
For fiscal 2021, the NEOs received 50% of their annual equity award in the form of service-based stock options. These grants vest 20% per year on the anniversary date of the grant over a five-year period, consistent with the terms of our recent annual stock option grants. Stock options have been intended to align incentives with long-term stock performance and the interests of stockholders and act as a motivational and retention tool. All NEOs received their stock option grant on November 9, 2020. Each stock option had an exercise price of $316.71 per share. The dollar value of each stock option award was converted on the grant date to a fixed number of stock options for each NEO using a stock option pricing formula.
In addition to this annual grant of stock options, Ms. Shan also received an additional grant of stock options in May 2021 in connection with her appointment as our CRO. See "May 2021 Equity Grant to Ms. Shan" below.
Performance Share Unit Awards
For fiscal 2021, the NEOs received 50% of their annual equity award in the form of performance share unit awards. The performance share unit awards are focused on creating visibility to outcomes that should drive long-term value creation, based on three-year cumulative performance. The performance share units have been designed to align incentives with long-term stock performance and the interests of stockholders and act as a motivational and retention tool.
2021 Proxy Statement 49
In addition to this annual grant of performance share units, Ms. Shan also received an additional grant of restricted share units in May 2021 in connection with her appointment as our CRO. See "May 2021 Equity Grant to Ms. Shan" below.
Each performance share unit represents the right to providereceive one share of FactSet common stock, subject to adjustment based on our performance during a three-year period from September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2023 (the "Performance Period") measured against certain specified performance goals established for the Performance Period based on our financial plan goals. The performance goals are based 50% on each of (a) our adjusted cumulative operating earnings during the Performance Period and (b) our adjusted cumulative revenues during the Performance Period.
| | | | | | | | |
| Performance Share Unit Vesting Schedule |
| Threshold Level of Performance | Target Level of Performance | Stretch Level of Performance |
| 50% | 100% | 150% |
At the threshold level of performance, 50% of the performance share units will vest; at the target level of performance, 100% of the performance share units will vest; and at the maximum level of performance, 150% of the performance share units will vest. There will be vesting based on linear interpolation between these levels. No performance share units will vest if performance is below the threshold level, and performance above the maximum level will not result in vesting of additional performance share units. The target level of performance, which results in vesting of 100% of the performance share units, reflects growth and margins over a three-year period ending in fiscal 2023 consistent with the goals set out in our internal three-year financial plan. The maximum level of performance, which results in vesting of 150% of the performance share units, is materially higher than the target level of performance and reflects significantly increased levels of growth in revenues and earnings.
All NEOs received their performance share unit awards on November 9, 2020. The dollar value of each performance share unit award was converted on the grant date to a fixed number of performance share units for each NEO using an equity pricing formula. Any performance share units earned will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date (November 9, 2023).
May 2021 Equity Grant to Ms. Shan
On April 20, 2021, we announced that Helen Shan, who was serving as our Executive Vice President and CFO, would be assuming the role of FactSet's CRO, effective May 3, 2021. In addition to her new CRO role, Ms. Shan continued to serve as our CFO during the remainder of fiscal 2021 while the Company conducted a search for her successor. In August 2021, we announced that Linda Huber will be joining FactSet as our CFO effective in early October 2021, during our 2022 fiscal year. See "Offer to Linda Huber" below.
As our CRO, Ms. Shan is responsible for all aspects of FactSet’s revenue performance, including the management of our global sales organization and the execution of our go-to-market strategy. In recognition of Ms. Shan's added responsibility, on April 14, 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee approved a one-time grant of a long term incentive award to Ms. Shan with an effective grant date of May 3, 2021 and a total award value of $1,200,000, consisting 50% of stock options and 50% of restricted share units. The stock options vest 20% per year on the anniversary date of the grant over a five-year period, consistent with the terms of our recent stock option grants, expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date, and have an exercise price of $342.06 per share. Each restricted share unit represents the right to receive one share of FactSet common stock and will vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date.
Offer to Linda Huber
On August 24, 2021, we announced that Linda Huber will be joining FactSet as our CFO effective in early October 2021, during our 2022 fiscal year. On August 12, 2021, during our 2021 fiscal year, the Compensation and Talent Committee approved the proposed fiscal 2022 compensation for Ms. Huber, as follows.
50 2021 Proxy Statement
Base Salary: An annual base salary of $550,000.
Annual Incentive: A total annual incentive target of $550,000 for fiscal 2022.
Long Term Incentive: A long term incentive equity grant as part of the Company's annual equity grant scheduled for November 2021 with a target grant date value of $2,250,000. This grant will be comprised of stock options with a grant date value of $750,000, performance share units with a grant date value of $750,000, and restricted share units with a target grant date value of $750,000. The stock options and performance share units will be granted on the same terms provided to our other NEOs in November 2021. The restricted share units will vest equally on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.
Stock Ownership and Holding Guidelines
On September 22, 2020, during fiscal 2021, our Board adopted the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Executive and Director Stock Ownership and Holding Guidelines (the "Stock Ownership Guidelines"). The Stock Ownership Guidelines require our non-employee directors ("Covered Directors") and certain of our senior executives ("Covered Officers"), including all of our NEOs, to maintain a material personal financial stake in FactSet to promote a long-term perspective in managing the enterprise and to align stockholder, executive and director interests. The Stock Ownership Guidelines require the Covered Directors and Covered Officers to maintain the following minimum equity stakes in FactSet commencing five years from the later of the date of the Stock Ownership Guidelines and the date such individual becomes covered under the Stock Ownership Guidelines (the "Target Date").
| | | | | |
| Covered Officers and Covered Directors |
| Role | Minimum Ownership Target |
| Chief Executive Officer | 6x annual base pay |
| Chief Financial Officer | 3x annual base pay |
| Other direct reports of the CEO | 2x annual base pay |
| Covered Directors | $400,000
|
Under the Stock Ownership Guidelines, we calculate compliance with the Minimum Ownership Target annually for each Covered Officer and Covered Director and notify all Covered Officers and Covered Directors of the status of their compliance with their Minimum Ownership Target so they may determine whether they must hold additional equity. If a Covered Officer or a Covered Director has not met the applicable Minimum Ownership Target by the Target Date, such Covered Officer or Covered Director thereafter must retain at least 50% of all net shares (post-tax) from the exercise, vesting, or payment of any equity awards until such Minimum Ownership Target is achieved.
We performed our first compliance calculation under the stock ownership guidelines as of February 1, 2021, and informed our Covered Directors and Covered Officers of the status of their holdings relative to the Stock Ownership Guidelines at that does not qualify for deduction under Section 162(m).time. We will continue to maintain flexibilitydo this assessment annually to assist each of our Covered Directors and Covered Officers in meeting the abilityappropriate Minimum Ownership Target by the applicable Target Date.
Exceptions to
pay competitive compensation by not requiring all compensation tothe Stock Ownership Guidelines may be
deductible.Forfeituremade at the discretion of Prior Compensation
On October 24, 2017, the Board adoptedif compliance would create severe hardship or prevent a Covered Officer or Covered Director from complying with a court order, such as part of a divorce settlement. It is expected that these instances will be rare. If an Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy applicable, atexception is granted in whole or in part, the Board’s discretion,Board will, in consultation with the affected Covered Officer or Covered Director, develop an alternative stock ownership guideline for such individual that reflects both the intention of the Stock Ownership Guidelines and such individual’s circumstances.
For the purposes of determining ownership levels, the following forms of equity interests in FactSet count towards stock ownership pursuant to our Section 16 filersthe Stock Ownership Guidelines: (a) shares held outright or beneficially owned by the Covered Officer or Covered Director; (b) shares held by the spouse or dependent children, if living in the eventsame household, of the Covered Officer or Covered Director; (c) shares held in trust for the economic benefit of the Covered Officer or Covered Director, or the spouse or dependent children, if living in the same household, of the Covered Officer or Covered Director; (d) shares held in the employee stock
2021 Proxy Statement 51
purchase plan by the Covered Officer; (e) vested shares held in a material restatement401(k), IRA, or other retirement plan by the Covered Officer or Covered Director; and (f) 75% of our financial statements due to willful misconduct. Prior tovested unexercised stock options that adoption, other than a provisionare in its existingthe money and are held by the Covered Officer or Covered Director.
Executive Severance Plan and Equity Award Agreements
The FactSet Research Systems Inc. Stock OptionExecutive Severance Plan (the “Executive Severance Plan”) has an effective date of March 1, 2020. The Executive Severance Plan covers the CEO and Award Plan, as Amendedthe other NEOs (among other executives and Restated allowing for clawback rights in accordance with listing requirements and award agreements, we did not have any additional clawback or reimbursement provisions in effect relatedsubject to any bonus, incentive payment or other compensation receiveddesignation otherwise by the Compensation and Talent Committee) (collectively, the “Executives”). We put the Executive Severance Plan in place in order to establish the payments and benefits to be provided in connection with an officerExecutive’s separation from FactSet under various circumstances, subject to the Executive’s ongoing compliance with applicable restrictive covenants, including non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality, and execution of a general release of claims in favor of FactSet.
The Compensation and Talent Committee approved adoption of the Executive Severance Plan to establish a standard approach for dealing with Executives upon separation from FactSet, ensuring equitable treatment of Executives in similar situations, and eliminating individual negotiations. The Executive Severance Plan further serves to enhance attraction and retention of Executives, providing financial protection to Executives and aligning their interests with those of stockholders by enabling Executives to focus on long-term value creation rather than job stability during transformational periods such as a potential change of control situation. Through the Executive Severance Plan, we may also, to the extent permissible by law, bind departing Executives with restrictive covenants such as non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality that will benefit FactSet.
The Executive Severance Plan provides that in the event
an Executive’s employment is terminated without cause (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan), other than during the two-year period following a change of
a restatement, fraud or other misconduct.Additionally,control (as defined in the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Stock Option and Award Plan, as Amended and Restated (the “Equity Plan”)), the Executive would be entitled to cash severance payments equal to (i) one times the sum of base salary and target bonus (1.5 times for the CEO) paid in substantially equal installments, (ii) a pro rata annual bonus under our annual incentive plan in respect of the year of termination based on actual performance (with individual performance goals deemed achieved at not less than target) and paid when bonuses are normally paid to other senior executives, (iii) reimbursement of the cost of continued coverage under our group health plan for 12 months (18 months for the CEO) and (iv) reasonable outplacement assistance up to $25,000 during the 12-month period following such termination with a firm determined by FactSet. Such severance payments and benefits would be subject to the Executive’s execution of and compliance with a separation agreement and general release in favor of FactSet, which would require compliance with existing non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants. In the event an Executive breaches the separation agreement, the Executive would forfeit the unpaid portion of any severance payments and benefits and we would be entitled to recover any amounts paid to the Executive prior to the date of the breach.
In addition, the Executive Severance Plan provides that in the event an Executive’s employment is terminated without cause or by the Executive for good reason (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan) within two years following a change of control, the Executive would be entitled to cash severance payments equal to (i) 1.5 times the sum of base salary and target bonus (2 times for the CEO) and a pro rata target bonus in respect of the year of termination, in each case, payable in a lump sum within 10 days following such termination, (ii) reimbursement of the cost of continued coverage under our group health plan for 18 months
(24 months for the CEO) and (iii) reasonable outplacement assistance up to $25,000 during the 12-month period following such termination with a firm determined by FactSet.
In connection with our adoption of the Executive Severance Plan, we also entered into an equity award letter agreement (the “Equity Award Agreement”) with each of the Executives. The Equity Award Agreements establish what will happen to equity awards granted to an Executive in connection with the Executive’s separation from FactSet under various circumstances, subject to the Executive’s ongoing compliance with applicable restrictive covenants, including non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality. The Equity Award Agreements amend the terms of each Executive’s outstanding unvested stock options, restricted stock units ("RSUs") and performance stock units ("PSUs") granted pursuant to the Equity Plan. The Equity Award Agreements also apply to future awards granted to each Executive (unless a particular grant provides otherwise), but do not affect vested awards. The Compensation and Talent Committee approved the Equity Award Agreements for the same reasons described above in connection with the adoption of the Executive Severance Plan.
52 2021 Proxy Statement
Each Equity Award Agreement provides that in the event an Executive’s employment is terminated without cause (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan), other than during the two-year period following a change of control (as defined in the Equity Plan), the Executive’s options and RSUs granted at least one year prior to termination will each vest in the next tranche and PSUs granted at least one year prior to termination will vest pro rata based on length of service before termination and actual achievement of goals for the full performance period. The Equity Award Agreement further provides that options are exercisable for 90 days after termination (or until expiration, if shorter), RSUs are settled on the regular vesting date and PSUs are settled at the end of the performance period. In accordance with the one-year minimum vesting requirement in the Equity Plan, all awards granted less than one year before termination will be forfeited, and all other awards that do not vest will be forfeited as well. Vesting is subject to the Executive’s execution of and compliance with a separation agreement and general release in favor of FactSet, which requires compliance with existing non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants.
In the event an Executive’s employment is terminated without cause or by the Executive for good reason (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan) within two years following a change of control, the Executive’s options and RSUs will vest in full and PSUs will vest with respect to the portion equal to the greater of (i) the pro rata portion based on length of service before termination and deemed achievement of goals at target levels and (ii) the portion of the award that vests based on actual performance through the change of control. The Equity Award Agreement further provides that options are exercisable for one year after termination (or until expiration, if shorter) and RSUs and PSUs are settled within 10 days after termination.
In addition, in the event an Executive’s employment is terminated due to death or disability (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan), the Executive’s options and RSUs granted at least one year prior to termination will vest in full and PSUs granted at least one year prior to termination will vest assuming achievement of performance goals at target levels, with options remaining exercisable for one year after termination (and an additional 180-day period in the event of death following termination due to disability) (or until expiration, if shorter), and RSUs and PSUs settled within ten days after termination. All awards granted less than one year prior to termination will be forfeited.
In the event an Executive retires (as defined in the Equity Award Agreement, which requires the Executive to be at least 60 years of age and with at least 10 full years of service at FactSet), the Executive’s options granted at least one year prior to termination will continue to vest, RSUs granted at least one year prior to termination will continue to vest in the next tranche only, and PSUs granted at least one year prior to termination will continue to vest subject to achievement of performance goals. Options will remain exercisable through the 90-day period following vesting of the final tranche of an option grant (or until expiration, if shorter), or, if earlier, the 90-day period following the date of noncompliance with any existing non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants, RSUs will be settled on the regular vesting date and PSUs will be settled at the end of the performance period. All outstanding awards that do not vest on retirement (including awards granted less than one year before termination) will be forfeited. Continued vesting is subject to the Executive’s execution of and compliance with a separation agreement and general release in favor of FactSet, which requires compliance with existing non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants through the date of vesting (even if beyond the date the covenants would ordinarily expire).
In the event of a change of control after an Executive retires, any options and RSUs that are outstanding following retirement and unvested as of the date of the change of control will vest in full, and PSUs that are outstanding following retirement and unvested as of the date of the change of control will vest based on deemed achievement of performance goals at the greater of target and actual performance through the change of control, with options remaining exercisable for one year after the change of control (or until expiration, if shorter) and RSUs and PSUs settled within ten days after the change of control.
In addition, in the event of an Executive’s death following retirement, any options and RSUs that are outstanding following retirement and unvested as of the date of death will vest in full and any PSUs that are outstanding as of retirement and unvested as of the date of death will remain outstanding and eligible to vest based on actual performance, with options remaining exercisable for one year after death (or until expiration, if shorter), RSUs settled within ten days after death and PSUs settled at the end of the performance period.
2021 Proxy Statement 53
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy
Transactions involving financial instruments (including, for example, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of FactSet securities are prohibited. Our employees, including our NEOs and other executives, and our directors are prohibited under our Insider Trading Policy from holding FactSet securities in a margin account or pledging FactSet securities as collateral for a loan.
Forfeiture of Prior Compensation - Clawback Policy
The FactSet Research Systems Inc. Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy (the "Clawback Policy") was updated and revised effective June 18, 2020. The Clawback Policy applies to all our officers under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, including all of our NEOs, and provides that:
•If FactSet’s financial statements must be restated for any reason, then the Board may, at its sole discretion, take action to recoup all or part of any Incentive Compensation (i.e., any cash compensation or an award of equity compensation from FactSet that is based in whole or in part on the achievement of financial performance) received by a covered officer. The amount of Incentive Compensation to be recouped in such circumstances would equal the amount by which the Incentive Compensation actually paid or awarded to a covered officer for the relevant period exceeded the lower payment that would have been made (or lesser or no vesting that would have occurred) based on the restated financial results, net of income taxes paid by the covered officer in respect of such payment or award. In determining whether to take action to recoup any Incentive Compensation received by a covered officer, the Board shall take into consideration whether the covered officer engaged in Misconduct (as defined in the Clawback Policy) that caused the restatement or knowingly or through gross negligence failed to prevent the Misconduct that caused the restatement if such officer was in a position to do so.
•If the Board concludes that a covered officer committed Misconduct resulting in material financial or reputational harm to FactSet, regardless of the occurrence of a restatement, the Board may seek recovery of all or a portion of the Incentive Compensation awarded to such officer for the performance period in which the Misconduct occurred. The Board may seek recovery of Incentive Compensation even if the Misconduct by the covered officer did not result in an award or payment greater than would have been awarded absent the Misconduct. As this clawback provision was first adopted on June 18, 2020, it applies only to Incentive Compensation granted on or after that date.
•The Board will determine, in its sole discretion and to the extent permitted by applicable law, the method for recouping Incentive Compensation under the Clawback Policy, which may include, without limitation, clawing back incentive compensation (bonus and equity) received by covered officers or withholding future compensation.
•The Clawback Policy allows for a three-year “look back” period on incentive compensation clawbacks.
Additionally, the Equity Plan authorizes the Board to recover, or “clawback,” equity compensation from
an NEONEOs based on their engagement in any competitive activities or acts of solicitation during their period of employment and for two years thereafter, including:
| ■
| Own, manage, operate, join or control, be employed by or participate in the ownership, management, operation or control of, or be a consultant to or connected in any other manner with, any business, firm or corporation which is similar to or competes with a principal business of FactSet or its subsidiaries (Competitive Activity) or
|
▪Own, manage, operate, join or control, be employed by or participate in the ownership, management, operation or control of, or be a consultant to or connected in any other manner with, any business, firm or corporation which is similar to or competes with a principal business of FactSet or its subsidiaries (Competitive Activity); or
▪For themselves or any person or business entity, induce or attempt to induce any employee of FactSet or its subsidiaries to terminate employment with FactSet or its subsidiaries or solicit, entice, take away or employ any person employed by FactSet or its subsidiaries (Solicitation).
| ■
| For themselves or any person or business entity, induce or attempt to induce any employee of FactSet or its subsidiaries to terminate employment with the Company or its subsidiaries or solicit, entice, take away or employ any person employed by the Company or its subsidiaries (Solicitation).
|
For these purposes, the officer’s ownership of securities of a public company not in excess of one percent of any class of such securities shall not be considered to be in competition with the CompanyFactSet or its subsidiaries. If the officer engages in a competitive activity
54 2021 Proxy Statement
or solicitation, as determined by the Board in good faith, the
plan’sstock options then held by the officer would expire as of the date that the officer first engaged in such activity and
the CompanyFactSet would have the right to acquire any shares of stock then owned by the officer as the result of the exercise of an award at a price equal to the lesser of the fair market value of such shares or the aggregate exercise price paid therefore by the officer.
The CompanyFactSet would also have the right to require the officer to return
to the Company any other gain (whether or not realized) the officer had on the exercise of any awards granted.
Process of Determining Annual Executive Compensation
The Compensation and Talent Committee reviews and makes decisions about executive policies and plans, including the amount of base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive awarded to the NEOs. To achieve the objectives and principles of its executive compensation program, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed the results of 2018 relative to ASV, operating margin, and
Tax Considerations
In establishing individual
goals established earlier in the year. The CEO and other executives assisted the Compensation and Talent Committee from time to time in its evaluation of compensation elements or program design by providing historical information, year-over-year comparisons and clarifications regarding job duties and performance.The Compensation and Talent Committee did not consider any forms of compensation other than salary, annual incentive and equity awards. FactSet has not entered into any employment agreements with any of its NEOs and as such, FactSet is not bound by any contractual salary, incentive grants or other compensation requirements for the NEOs except for the separation agreements relating to the two departing NEOs as noted below. Perquisites have historically constituted 5% or less of each NEO’s total compensation and represent the dollar value of matching contributions to the FactSet 401(k) Plan made by FactSet on behalf of each NEO, and the use and transfer of Company automobiles to each NEO as part of the elimination of the Company automobile perquisite.
In fiscal 2018, the Compensation and Talent Committee worked with management in the compensation review process as follows:
Performance Evaluation - The CEO’s performance is reviewed by the Compensation and Talent Committee. The CEO annually reviews the performance of each executive officer who reports to him, including the NEOs listed in the Summary Compensation Table. The Compensation and Talent Committee and Mr. Snow identified appropriate performance measures and proposed performance objectives that were used in determining annual and long-term awards. More specifically, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed materials outlining the individual performance of each NEO with respect to their goals and objectives for the past year, measured against financial goals for the Company’s performance as well as quantitative performance in the individual executive’s functional area. Management also provided the Compensation and Talent Committee with materials regarding the overall financial performance of the Company as well as operational and strategic accomplishments during the past fiscal year. These materials included ASV metrics, professional services growth and adjusted operating margin analysis that were all evaluated to determine the amount of the annual incentive awarded.
Compiled Benchmark Data �� Management prepared benchmarking and competitive data with respect to historical compensation and its defined peer group. The Compensation and Talent Committee utilized this information in connection with establishing NEO compensation programs and parameters at its meetings.
Compensation Approvals - The Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed materials detailing the historical salary, annual incentive, total cash, equity awards and totalexecutives’ compensation levels, of the NEOswe do not explicitly consider accounting and other senior members of management. The conclusions reached and recommendations made were based on performance reviews, including with respect to salary adjustments and annual and long-term incentive awards that were presented to the Compensation and Talent Committeetax issues. Our tax deduction for approval.
The Compensation and Talent Committee members then made their determinations as to the annual incentive and equity awards for the recently completed fiscal year and base salary for the upcoming year for each NEO. Management did not participate in this deliberation and the CEO was not present for discussions regarding his own compensation. At the same meeting, the Compensation and Talent Committee approved the total annual incentive and equity award pools for the Company’s operational areas as a whole, so that compensation to the NEOs was made in the larger context of compensation for all the Company’s employees.
Use of Performance Targets to Derive Compensation - In fiscal 2018, corporate financial guidelines related to ASV growth and Adjusted Operating Margin were agreed with management and approved by the Committee for the annual incentive program. In prior years, we did not establish financial guidelines for the annual incentive program. In addition, individual objectives were established for each NEO relating to the executive’s job responsibilities and other Company projects and initiatives. At the end of the fiscal year, the CEO used his judgment to evaluate the performance of the other NEOs against the financial guidelines, their personal objectives and other personal accomplishments and contributions to the organization and made recommendations to the Compensation and Talent Committee regarding the payout for both the 80% attributed to the financial guidelines and the 20% of the annual incentive target that was based on the achievement of the individual goals. The Compensation and Talent Committee took such recommendation and performance into account when deciding on the payout of the total annual incentive.
2018 Performance
Goals and Objectives
The Compensation and Talent Committee agreed on the NEOs’ performance and related compensation through conversation and discussion. In conjunction with its review of the performance of the Company as a whole, the Compensation and Talent Committee determined the actual size of annual incentive payments and equity-based grants awardedpaid to each of the NEOs. With respectNEOs who are subject to the 80% percentcompensation limits of Section 162(m) of the annual incentive award that was attributed to ASV and Adjusted Operating Margin, the 2018 financial results for those measures were compared against the guidelines. However, in that comparison, the Compensation and Talent Committee included the Company’s actual 2018 professional services revenues increase of $4.4Internal Revenue Code is capped at $1 million in measuring ASV growth for each NEO’s performance versus the guidelines. The 20% of the annual incentive award was based on the Compensation and Talent Committee’s subjective evaluation of the executives’ achievement of qualitative individual goals and other personal accomplishments set out in materials provided to the Compensation and Talent Committee by management or otherwise provided to the Committee at its meeting. The fiscal 2018 individual goals of each NEO were as follows:
| ■ | Mr. Snow’s goals were to ensure the further development of various workflow solutions, promote innovation in the Company’s data and solutions exchange (Open:FactSet), and strengthen relationships with strategic accounts. He was also tasked with implementing key organizational changes to enable future growth and overall executive capability and accountability, as well as launching several diversity, inclusion and CSR initiatives, while enhancing an energetic, ethical and high-performance culture.
|
| ■ | Mr. Wiseman’s goals were to improve the efficiency and performance of the client solutions group, increase the number of long term contracts and improve alignment of headcount with regard to real estate and revenue opportunities within budgetary targets.
|
| ■ | Mr. Fernandez’s goals were to improve systems stability, improve systems architecture, develop products more efficiently and innovate new ways to compensate and retain top technology and product talent.
|
| ■ | Mr. Nicolelli’s goals were to develop the financial planning and analysis function, to plan the implementation of the Workday system from a finance perspective, develop the investor relations infrastructure, and develop the business development function.
|
| ■ | Mr. Baker-Greene’s goals were to plan the implementation of the Workday system from a human resources perspective, improve workforce efficiency, advance diversity and inclusion and corporate social responsibility initiatives, create a talent development program, and design and implement a global compensation structure.
|
Base Salary
Based on the review described above under “Base Salary,” the Compensation and Talent Committee did not increase the base salary of any NEO for fiscal 2018 other than the salary of Mr. Snow, who received an increase of 12.5% because of competitive market rebalancing. The Compensation and Talent Committee did not to give salary increases to the other NEOs during fiscal 2018.
Annual Incentive
For fiscal 2018, 80% of the annual incentive guidelines were as follows:
Measures | | Weighting | | | Base Performance | | | Target Performance | | | Stretch Performance | |
Organic ASV Growth | | | 50% | | | $ | 60M | | | $ | 75M | | | $ | 90M | |
Adjusted Operating Margin | | | 30% | | | | 31.5% | | | | 32.0% | | | | 32.5% | |
For fiscal 2018, the Company achieved Organic ASV growth of $74.4 million and Adjusted Operating Margin of 31.3%. Organic ASV growth combined with the $4.4 million increase in professional services totaled $78.8 million during fiscal 2018, which was the figure used for the evaluation. The Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed the 2018 financial results for Organic ASV growth, Organic ASV growth plus professional services and Adjusted Operating Margin and compared them to the guidelines. The Compensation and Talent Committee exercised its discretion on the Adjusted Operating Margin measure and elected to award the minimum base performance payout for each NEO for that measure. The Committee also reviewed the personal goals for each NEO as outlined above under 2018 Performance- Goals and Objectives, as well as individual accomplishments of each NEO in determining the annual incentive.
The Compensation and Talent Committee considered all the above, including the financial results for the target measures, the financial guidelines, the recommendations and evaluation by the CEO of the other NEOs, the achievement of individual goals and other personal accomplishments, overall Company performance for the fiscal year and, using this total mix of information, exercised its subjective judgment for each NEO and made the following awards for the NEOs for fiscal 2018:
NEO | | Total Annual Incentive Opportunity | | | Total Annual Incentive Percentage Awarded | | | Total Annual Incentive Paid | |
F. Philip Snow | | $ | 1,000,000 | | | | 115 | % | | $ | 1,150,000 | |
John Wiseman | | $ | 600,000 | | | | 121 | % | | $ | 725,000 | |
Gene Fernandez | | $ | 450,000 | | | | 100 | % | | $ | 450,000 | |
Maurizio Nicolelli | | $ | 550,000 | | | | 100 | % | | $ | 550,000 | |
Edward Baker-Greene | | $ | 350,000 | | | | 93 | % | | $ | 325,000 | |
In particular, for Mr. Snow, the Compensation and Talent Committee’s decision was based on its view of the Company’s financial performance, including ASV Growth together with professional services fee results compared to the measure. The Committee also considered strategic outcomes with particular emphasis on significant progress made in the Company’s data and solutions exchange (Open:FactSet) and strategic accounts. In addition, the Committee factored into the decision Mr. Snow’s overall leadership of the organization. It noted that he had led and successfully implemented several key organizational changes which helped to position the Company for future growth and improved overall executive capability and accountability. The Committee also recognized his efforts to launch successfully several diversity, inclusion and CSR initiatives and his reinforcement and enhancement of an energetic, ethical and high-performance culture.
Stock Option Awards
For fiscal 2018, the NEOs received equity awards that are comprised of 100% service-based stock options. These grants vest 20% per year on the anniversary date of the grant over a five-year period. The Compensation and Talent Committee believed this was the most effective way to promote equity ownership by the executives, reward them for solid operating performance and provide a retention incentive. Stock options have been intended to align incentives with long-term stock performance and the interests of stockholders and act as a motivational and retention tool. All NEOs (other than Mr. Fernandez) received an annual grant on November 2, 2017. Mr. Fernandez joined FactSet on November 27, 2017 and received a one-time grant of stock options on December 22, 2017 as part of his hiring package. The dollar value of each award was converted on the grant date to a fixed number of options for each NEO using an option pricing formula.
Peer Group Executive Compensation Review
The Compensation and Talent Committee is provided executive compensation data of similarly situated NEOs at companies determined to be comparable by the Compensation and Talent Committee. The peer group consists of CoStar Group, Inc., IHS Markit Ltd, Morningstar, Inc., MSCI Inc., SS&C Technologies, T. Rowe Price and Verint Systems Inc. Three peer group companies were removed from the list. The Advisory Board and Corporate Executive Board (“CEB”) were removed as they were acquired by larger organizations, and Solera Holdings was removed as the company is no longer publicly-held and as such compensation data will no longer be available.
In addition to that of the identified peer group, the compensation provided to NEOs at the following companies was reviewed by the Compensation and Talent Committee: Federated Investors, Janus Capital Group, Inc., NASDAQ OMX, Verisk Analytics and Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. The materials presented to the Compensation and Talent Committee detailed the compensation by type, including salary, annual incentive and equity awards. The Compensation and Talent Committee believes that its total target compensation for NEOs is competitive. When considering peer compensation levels, the Compensation and Talent Committee focuses on total compensation comparisons, as we have, and will continue to emphasize long-term equity more prominently than peer companies. The Committee believes that the Company’s pay mix is reflective of the goals of retaining top talent and aligning executives with stockholder returns.
Separation Agreements with Messrs. Nicolelli and Baker-Greene
On May 8, 2018, FactSet entered into a separation of employment and general release agreement with Mr. Nicolelli (the “Nicolelli Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Nicolelli would remain in his position as CFO until his successor was appointed, participate in an orderly transition of duties to the new CFO and remain an employee of FactSet until his effective termination date of December 31, 2018. In exchange for fulfilling these obligations to the Company, Mr. Nicolelli would receive, under the terms of his agreement, the following: (i) a lump sum separation payment of $483,333 within 15 days after expiration of the revocation period as defined in the agreement; (ii) continued base salary of $300,000 through December 31, 2018; and (iii) the acceleration of the vesting of certain outstanding stock options. In addition, the Nicolelli Agreement provides for a release of claims by Mr. Nicolelli and the Company and other terms and conditions customary for agreements of this nature. Mr. Nicolelli ceased to be the CFO on August 31, 2018, shortly after which his successor joined the Company.
On July 5, 2018, FactSet entered into a separation of employment and general release agreement with Mr. Baker-Greene (the “Baker-Greene Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Baker-Greene will remain in his current position as CHRO until his successor is appointed, participate in an orderly transition of duties to the new CHRO and remain an employee of FactSet until November 30, 2018. In exchange for fulfilling these obligations to the Company, Mr. Baker-Greene will receive, under the terms of the agreement, the following: (i) a lump sum separation payment of $387,500 on the first scheduled payroll after December 1, 2018; (ii) continued base salary of $300,000 through November 30, 2018; (iii) the acceleration of the vesting of certain outstanding stock options; and (iv) certain other ancillary benefits. In addition, the Baker-Greene Agreement provides for a release of claims by Mr. Baker-Greene and the Company and other terms and conditions customary for agreements of this nature.
The Compensation and Talent Committee provided these arrangements to these two officers to provide transitional services and to help ensure a successful transition to a replacement.
COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation and Talent Committee (the “Committee”) is responsible for administering FactSet’s executive compensation policies and practices. The Committee is comprised solely of independent directors and reports regularly to the Board. Independent directors are not eligible to participate in any of the plans or programs the Committee administers. In fiscal 2018, the Committee reviewed compensation, including equity-based awards, for each NEO and the CEO’s direct reports. The Committee reviews and approves the aggregate number of equity-based awards granted to all employees of FactSet. The Committee also reviews the compensation, including stock and option-based awards, for each member of senior management including those employees who report directly to the CEO. The Committee believes that the fiscal 2018 compensation of the NEOs was aligned with FactSet’s performance and returns to stockholders and provided a balanced mix between base pay and incentive compensation.
The Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above and recommended to the Board that it be included in this Proxy Statement.NEO. The Compensation and Talent Committee has representedin the past reserved the right to management that, to the extent that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” purports to disclose the Compensation and Talent Committee’s deliberations and philosophy in making executive compensation decisions and policy, it is accurate and materially complete.
SUBMITTED BY THE COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Laurie Siegel, Chair
Malcolm Frank
Joseph R. Zimmel
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The tables below present compensation information for each NEO followed by a narrative discussion ofprovide compensation that each NEO could receive when their employment with the Company terminatesdoes not qualify for deduction under various circumstances or upon a change in control of the Company. The tables include footnotes and other narrative explanations important for your understanding of the compensation information in each table.
The first table below, the Summary Compensation Table, sets forth the compensation earned by the NEOs for services rendered in all capacitiesSection 162(m). We will continue to FactSet for each respective fiscal year. The Company’s NEOs include FactSet’s Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”), Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”)maintain flexibility and the three most highly compensated executive officers (other than the PEO and PFO) during fiscal 2018.
Summary ability to pay competitive compensation by not requiring all compensation to be deductible.
Compensation
TableThe following table summarizes the compensation earned or awarded to each NEO for fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016.
| | | | | | | | | | | | Stock | | | Option | | | All Other | | | | | |
| | | | Salary | | | Bonus(1) | | | Awards(2) | | | Awards(3) | | | Compensation(4) | | | Total | |
Name and Principal Position | Year | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | |
F. Philip Snow(5) | 2018 | | $ | 445,833 | | | $ | 1,150,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,500,000 | | | $ | 33,676 | | | $ | 3,129,509 | |
Chief Executive Officer | 2017 | | $ | 400,000 | | | $ | 850,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,300,000 | | | $ | 41,694 | | | $ | 2,591,694 | |
| | 2016 | | $ | 350,000 | | | $ | 800,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 49,576 | | | $ | 1,199,576 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gene Fernandez(6)(7) | 2018 | | $ | 225,000 | | | $ | 450,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 750,000 | | | $ | 7,846 | | | $ | 1,432,846 | |
Executive Vice President | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chief Technology and Product Officer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
John W. Wiseman(6) | 2018 | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 725,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 375,000 | | | $ | 8,139 | | | $ | 1,408,139 | |
Executive Vice President, Global | 2017 | | $ | 256,000 | | | $ | 475,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 930,0000 | | | $ | 34,273 | | | $ | 1,695,273 | |
Head of Sales and Client Solutions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maurizio Nicolelli(8)(9) | 2018 | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 550,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 375,000 | | | $ | 526,444 | | | $ | 1,751,444 | |
Senior Vice President | 2017 | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 500,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 700,000 | | | $ | 36,271 | | | $ | 1,536,271 | |
Former Chief Financial Officer | 2016 | | $ | 275,000 | | | $ | 450,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 47,241 | | | $ | 1,072,241 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Edward Baker-Greene(10) | 2018 | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 325,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 453,937 | | | $ | 1,378,937 | |
Senior Vice President | 2017 | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 325,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 325,000 | | | $ | 53,307 | | | $ | 1,003,307 | |
Chief Human Resources Officer | 2016 | | $ | 275,000 | | | $ | 350,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 800,000 | | | $ | 53,802 | | | $ | 1,478,802 | |
| (1)
| The Bonus column lists discretionary cash bonuses awarded for services rendered during the applicable fiscal year. Annual variable compensation payments are made within two months following the end of each fiscal year. See the detailed description of the annual incentive in the preceding CD&A.
|
| (2)
| The amounts set forth in the Stock Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718.
|
| (3)
| The amounts set forth in the Option Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The Company utilizes a lattice-binomial model to estimate the fair value of new stock options on the date of grant. The assumptions made for the valuation of option awards are disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s fiscal 2018Annual Report on Form 10-K. A stock option has value only if the Company’s stock price increases above the option exercise price (an “in-the-money” option). If an NEO exercises an in-the-money option, they would then realize an actual gain. Any gain actually realized for options exercised in fiscal 2018 is reported in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table.
|
| (4)
| Amounts in the All Other Compensation column reflect employer matching contributions to the FactSet 401(k) Plan, the use of Company-owned automobiles and the fair market value of each Company automobile transferred from FactSet to certain NEOs during fiscal 2018 upon termination of the Company-owned car program. The fair market value at the time of the title transfers were as follows:Mr. Snow $24,459; Mr. Nicolelli $20,846; and Mr. Baker-Greene $38,819. The net book value at the time of the title transfers were as follows: Mr. Snow $0; Mr. Nicolelli $0; and Mr. Baker-Greene $35,166.
|
| (5)
| Mr. Snow received no additional compensation for serving on the Company’s Board of Directors during any of the years presented.
|
| (6)
| For Messrs. Wiseman and Fernandez, compensation is shown only for the years that they were NEOs.
|
| (7)
| Upon joining FactSet on November 27, 2017, Mr. Fernandezwas hired with an annual base salary of $300,000 and a target annual performance bonus of $450,000. Salary amount shown is pro rata for fiscal 2018 based on his start date.
|
| (8)
| Mr. Nicolelli received a retirement gift during fiscal 2018 with a fair market value of $11,645. This gift is reported within the All Other Compensation column.
|
Risk Assessment
| (9)
| On May 8, 2018, FactSet entered into a separation of employment and general release agreement with Mr. Nicolelli, pursuant to which he would remain as Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) until his successor was appointed, participate in an orderly transition of duties to the new CFO and remain an employee of FactSet until his effective separation date of December 31, 2018. In exchange for fulfilling these obligations to the Company, Mr. Nicolelli will receive a lump sum separation payment of $483,333 within 15 days after expiration of the revocation period, continued annual base salary of $300,000 through December 31, 2018; and the acceleration of the vesting of certain outstanding stock options. The lump sum separation payment is included in Mr. Nicolelli’sAll Other Compensation column.
|
| (10)
| On July 5, 2018, FactSet entered into a separation of employment and general release agreement with Mr. Baker-Greene, pursuant to which he will remain as Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”) until his successor is appointed, participate in an orderly transition of duties to the new CHRO and remain an employee of FactSet until his effective termination date of November 30, 2018. In exchange for fulfilling these obligations to the Company, Mr. Baker-Greene will receive a lump sum separation payment of $387,500 within 15 days after expiration of the revocation period, continued annual base salary of $300,000 through November 30, 2018; and the acceleration of the vesting of certain outstanding stock options. The lump sum separation payment is included in Mr. Baker-Greene’s All Other Compensation column.
|
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation.The Company did not award non-equity incentive compensation during fiscal 2018 to any of its NEOs.
Stock Awards.For fiscal 2018, the Compensation and Talent Committee believes that the most effective way to promote equity ownership for each NEO is to reward them for solid operating performance and the best way to retain them is to award service-based stock options as the vehicles for equity-based compensation. As a result, the Company granted service-based stock option awards to its NEOs during fiscal 2018 instead of restricted stock awards.
Option Awards.The Compensation and Talent Committee approved the issuance of option awards during fiscal 2018. In November 2017 (but in the case of Mr. Fernandez, in December 2017), the NEOs were granted service-based stock option awards.
Service-based stock option grant. Stock options have been intended to align incentives with long-term stock performance and the interests of stockholders and act as a motivation and retention tool. The service-based stock options granted in fiscal 2018 to the NEOs vest 20% on each anniversary date of the grant over a five-year period.
The following table provides information on all option awards granted during fiscal 2018 to each NEO. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value, as listed in this table, of the option awards will ever be realized. The grant date fair value of these awards are included in the “Option Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Name | Grant Date(1)(2) | | Threshold | | | Target(2) | | | Maximum(2) | | | All Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options | | | Exercise Price ($) | | | Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards ($)(3) | |
F. Philip Snow | 11/2/17 | | | — | | | | 31,075 | | | | 31,075 | | | | 31,075 | | | $ | 189.98 | | | $ | 1,500,000 | |
Gene Fernandez | 12/22/17 | | | — | | | | 15,363 | | | | 15,363 | | | | 15,363 | | | $ | 192.11 | | | $ | 750,000 | |
John W. Wiseman | 11/2/17 | | | — | | | | 7,769 | | | | 7,769 | | | | 7,769 | | | $ | 189.98 | | | $ | 375,000 | |
Maurizio Nicolelli | 11/2/17 | | | — | | | | 7,769 | | | | 7,769 | | | | 7,769 | | | $ | 189.98 | | | $ | 375,000 | |
Edward Baker-Greene | 11/2/17 | | | — | | | | 6,215 | | | | 6,215 | | | | 6,215 | | | $ | 189.98 | | | $ | 300,000 | |
| (1)
| On September 24, 2017, the Compensation and Talent Committee approved the total number of option awards to be allocated among all eligible employees and specifically approved the option awards to be granted to each NEO.The Compensation and Talent Committee designated November 2, 2017 as the actual grant date for the annual equity grant, at an option exercise price equal to 100% of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on that date.Mr. Fernandez did not receive the annual equity grant on November 2, 2017 as he was not an employee of the Company on such date. He received a one-time grant in conjunctionwith his employment on December 22, 2017, which was approved by the Compensation and Talent Committee on November 6, 2017.
|
| (2)
| Options granted vest 20% on each anniversary date of the grant over a five-year period. The option awards are service-based and do not contain performance criteria.
|
| (3)
| The amounts set forth in the Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The Company utilizes a lattice-binomial model to estimate the fair value of new stock options on the date of grant. The assumptions made for the valuation of option awards are disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s fiscal 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. A stock option has value only if the Company’s stock price increases above the option exercise price (an “in-the-money” option). If an NEO exercises an in-the-money option, he would then realize an actual gain. Any gain actually realized for options exercised in fiscal 2018 is reported in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table below.
|
Outstanding Equity Awards (Restricted Stock) at Fiscal Year-end
The following table sets forth information regarding the number of shares and the value of unvested restricted stock awards held by the NEOs at August 31, 2018.
Name | | Grant Date | | | Number of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested(1) | | | Market Value of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) | |
F. Philip Snow | | 11/1/13 | | | | 783 | | | $ | 179,612 | |
Gene Fernandez | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
John W. Wiseman | | 11/1/13 | | | | 392 | | | $ | 89,921 | |
Maurizio Nicolelli | | 11/1/13 | | | | 979 | | | $ | 224,573 | |
Edward Baker-Greene | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| (1)
| The stock awards granted on November 1, 2013 cliff vested 60% on November 1, 2016 and the remaining 40% will vest on November 1, 2018. The awards previously granted to Messrs. Snow and Wiseman were granted when they were employees but not executive officers of the Company.
|
| (2)
| The market value of the restricted stock awards that have not vested is calculated by multiplying the number of shares that have not vested by the closing price of FactSet common stock on August 31, 2018, which was $229.39.
|
Outstanding Equity Awards (Stock Options) at Fiscal Year-end
The table below shows each NEO’s outstanding option grants at August 31, 2018. For each outstanding option grant, the table shows the stock options that have vested (or that are “Exercisable”) and those not yet vested (or that are “Unexercisable”). One option is the right to buy one share of common stock.
| | | | | Number of Options | | | Exercise | | |
Name | | Grant Date | | Exercisable | | | Unexercisable | | | Price | | Expiration Date |
F. Philip Snow | | 11/1/11 | | | 4,729 | (1) | | | — | | | $ | 94.84 | | 11/1/21 |
| | | 11/1/12 | | | 9,488 | (2) | | | — | | | $ | 92.22 | | 11/1/22 |
| | | 11/3/14 | | | 12,742 | (3) | | | 8,495 | | | $ | 131.31 | | 11/3/24 |
| | | 7/1/15 | | | 40,000 | (4) | | | 80,000 | | | $ | 164.90 | | 7/1/25 |
| | | 11/1/16 | | | 6,592 | (6) | | | 26,369 | | | $ | 152.28 | | 11/1/26 |
| | | 11/2/17 | | | — | (6) | | | 31,075 | | | $ | 189.98 | | 11/2/27 |
Gene Fernandez | | 12/22/17 | | | — | | | | 15,363 | (6) | | $ | 192.11 | | 12/22/27 |
John W. Wiseman | | 11/1/11 | | | 72 | (1) | | | — | | | $ | 94.84 | | 11/1/21 |
| | | 11/1/12 | | | 822 | (2) | | | — | | | $ | 92.22 | | 11/1/22 |
| | | 11/3/14 | | | 1,990 | (3) | | | 1,328 | | | $ | 131.31 | | 11/3/24 |
| | | 5/1/15 | | | 800 | (5) | | | 534 | | | $ | 159.14 | | 5/1/25 |
| | | 11/2/15 | | | 892 | (6) | | | 1,339 | | | $ | 175.20 | | 11/2/25 |
| | | 11/1/16 | | | 915 | (6) | | | 3,649 | | | $ | 152.28 | | 11/1/26 |
| | | 7/6/17 | | | 3,608 | (6) | | | 14,425 | | | $ | 160.58 | | 7/6/27 |
| | | 11/2/17 | | | — | (6) | | | 7,769 | | | $ | 189.98 | | 11/2/27 |
Maurizio Nicolelli(7) | | 11/3/14 | | | 3,982 | (3) | | | 2,655 | | | $ | 131.31 | | 11/3/24 |
| | | 11/2/15 | | | 2,550 | (6) | | | 3,825 | | | $ | 175.20 | | 11/2/25 |
| | | 11/1/16 | | | 3,551 | (6) | | | 14,197 | | | $ | 152.28 | | 11/1/26 |
| | | 11/2/17 | | | — | (6) | | | 7,769 | | | $ | 189.98 | | 11/2/27 |
Edward Baker-Greene(8) | | 6/1/15 | | | 2,912 | (5) | | | 1,942 | | | $ | 166.74 | | 6/1/25 |
| | | 11/2/15 | | | 6,800 | (6) | | | 10,200 | | | $ | 175.20 | | 11/2/25 |
| | | 11/1/16 | | | 1,648 | (6) | | | 6,592 | | | $ | 152.28 | | 11/1/26 |
| | | 11/2/17 | | | — | (6) | | | 6,215 | | | $ | 189.98 | | 11/2/27 |
| (1)
| These options vested 20% one year after the grant date, with the remainder vesting at a rate of 1.67% per month.
|
| (2)
| Included in the options granted on November 1, 2012 are performance-based options. Theseperformance-based options vested 40% on November 1, 2014 and then 1.67% per month thereafter. The remaining performance-based options that did not become eligible to vest (representing 80% of the original grant) were recorded as pre-vesting forfeitures as of August 31, 2014.
|
| (3)
| Options granted on November 3, 2014, cliff vested 60% after three years of service (on November 3, 2017) and the remaining 40% will vest after five years (on November 3, 2019).
|
| (4)
| These options vest 11.11% upon each anniversary date of the grant and will be fully vested after nine years (on July 1, 2024).
|
| (5)
| These options cliff vest 60% on the third anniversary date of the award and the remaining 40% cliff vest after the fifth anniversary date of the award.
|
| (6)
| These options vest 20% on each anniversary date of the award over a five-year period.
|
| (7)
| In accordance with Mr. Nicolelli’s separation agreement, the Company accelerated the vesting of certain of hisoutstanding options effective upon his separation on December 31, 2018. In total, 12,582 of his outstanding grants were accelerated to vest as of his effective date of departure, with the remaining unvested options forfeited. In accordance with the terms of the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Stock Option and Award Plan, as Amended and Restated, Mr. Nicolelli will have 90 days in which to exercise these options after his separation. Any options not exercised at the end of this period will be forfeited.
|
| (8)
| In accordance with Mr. Baker-Greene’s separation agreement, the Company will accelerate the vesting of certain of his outstanding options effective upon his separation on November 30, 2018. In total, 7,261 of his outstanding grants were accelerated to vest as of his effective date of departure, with the remaining unvested options forfeited. In accordance with the terms of the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Stock Option and Award Plan, as Amended and Restated, Mr. Baker-Greene will have 90 days in which to exercise these options after his separation. Any options not exercised at the end of this period will be forfeited.
|
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth information regarding the number and value of stock options exercised and stock awards vested for each NEO during fiscal 2018. Exercised options and restricted stock are not required to be held for a specified period.
| | | Option Awards | | | Stock Awards | |
Name | | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise | | | Value Realized on Exercise(1) | | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting | | | Value Realized on Vesting | |
F. Philip Snow | | | 7,334 | | | $ | 680,889 | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Gene Fernandez | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
John W. Wiseman | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Maurizio Nicolelli | | | 16,162 | | | $ | 1,756,542 | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Edward Baker-Greene | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| (1)
| Based upon the market price of the purchased shares on the exercise date less the option exercise price paid for such shares.
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The Company does not have a Compensation Deferral Program for NEOs, thus the nonqualified deferred compensation table has been omitted for fiscal 2018.
Pension Benefits
The Company does not have a pension program; thus, no pension retirement benefits were paid to executives in fiscal 2018.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
At the end of fiscal 2018, the Company did not have employment agreements with any of the NEOs. The Company sponsors equity incentive compensation plans that provide the NEOs with accelerated compensation in connection with a termination of employment and/or change of control under the following circumstances.
Change in Control
The FactSet Research Systems Inc. Stock Option and Award Plan, as Amended and Restated was adopted by stockholder vote on December 19, 2017. This Plan has a “double trigger” vesting provision so that awards will vest only if (i) the awards are not assumed, continued or substituted by an acquirer in a transaction, or (ii) the awards are assumed, continued or substituted by an acquirer in a transaction but the grantee’s service is involuntarily terminated within the 24-month period after the transaction, and, in the case of performance awards, the acceleration is limited to either (a) assumed achievement of the applicable performance goals at 100% of target with the result prorated based on the period of the grantee’s actual service during the applicable full performance period, or (b) actual achievement of the applicable performance goals, as determined by the Compensation and Talent Committee. The prior plan under which options were granted before December 19, 2017 has an automatic full vesting upon a change in control of the Company. The change in beneficial ownership trigger in each case is more-than-50% change in ownership.
Death or Disability
Upon the NEO’s death, any unexercised option award to the extent exercisable on the date of the NEO’s death may be exercised in whole or in part, at any time within one year after the NEO’s death, by a beneficiary or an estate. If a NEO becomes disabled, any unexercised option award to the extent exercisable at the date of such termination of employment due to disability may be exercised in whole or in part, at any time within one year after the date of termination.
Termination without Cause
If the Company terminates the NEO for any reason other than cause, death or disability, then any unexercised option award, to the extent exercisable at the date of such termination of employment, may be exercised, in whole or in part, at any time within three months after such termination of employment; provided, however, that if the NEO dies within the three-month period following such termination of employment, the option award may be exercised by the deceased NEO’s personal representative or by the person to whom the option award is transferred by will or the applicable laws of descent and distribution within 180 days of the NEO’s death, but in no event beyond the scheduled expiration of the option award.
Termination with Cause
Upon termination with cause, all unexercised awards terminate immediately.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Upon termination of employment, all amounts in the participant’s account are paid to the participant.
Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or a Change in Control Table
The information in the table below summarizes the compensation that would be paid under plans and contractual arrangements in effect as of August 31, 2018 to each of the NEOs in the event of termination of such executive’s employment with the Company and/or change of control of the Company as of that date. The amounts assume that the listed officer left FactSet effective August 31, 2018, and that the price per share of FactSet common stock on that date was $229.39. The amounts are based upon the difference between $229.39 and the exercise price of the unvested awards held by the NEO at August 31, 2018.
Name | | Death or Disability | | | Termination Without Cause | | | Termination With Cause | | | Change in Control(1) | |
F. Philip Snow | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 9,430,009 | |
Gene Fernandez | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 572,733 | |
John W. Wiseman | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,910,380 | |
Maurizio Nicolelli(2) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,093,159 | |
Edward Baker-Greene(3) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,427,647 | |
| (1)
| The Change in Control payout is applicable to (a) all option awards granted to Company employees that have not been exercised, that have not expired by their terms, or for which restrictions have not yet lapsed shall immediately be fully exercisable and (b) all stock awards granted to Company employees that have not vested or for which restrictions have not yet lapsed shall immediately be fully vested.
|
| (2)
| For information regarding Mr. Nicolelli’s separation agreement, see footnote 9 to the Summary Compensation Table.
|
| (3)
| For information regarding Mr. Baker-Greene’s separation agreement, see footnote 10 to the Summary Compensation Table.
|
CEO Pay Ratio
As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and SEC rules and regulations, FactSet is providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of its employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Snow.
For the fiscal year completed August 31, 2018, the median of the annual total compensation of all employees at FactSet (other than its CEO), was $15,331, and the annual total compensation of its CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement, was $3,129,509. Based on this information, for 2018 a reasonable estimate, calculated in a manner consistent with SEC regulations, of the ratio of the annual total compensation of its CEO, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 204 to 1. Given the differences in their particular facts and circumstances, and the various methodologies that public companies may use to determine their pay ratio, the ratio should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.
For purposes of the above disclosure, FactSet is required to identify its median employee based on its global workforce, without regard to their location, compensation arrangements, or employment status (full-time versus part-time). As such, to identify the median of the annual total compensation of all employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions that the Company used were as follows:
| ■
| Selected August 31, 2018 as the date upon which the Company would identify the “median employee” as it corresponds to its fiscal year end
|
| ■
| Provided annualized compensation of all permanent employees who were new-hires in 2018
|
| ■
| No cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the “median employee”
|
| ■
| Applied the local currency to U.S. dollar exchange spot rate as of August 31, 2018, to the compensation paid to non-U.S. associates to facilitate comparison of all associates in U.S. dollars.
|
For purposes of measuring the compensation of the Company’s employees, FactSet selected base salary or wages plus overtime pay, plus annual cash incentive bonuses, plus allowances, plus equity grants, as the most appropriate measures of compensation. Using this methodology, FactSet determined that the “median employee” was a full-time, salaried employee located in the Company’s Hyderabad, India office, where 34% of FactSet’s employees are based, or 3,297 of the Company’s 9,571 employees worldwide at August 31, 2018.
With respect to the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” FactSet identified and calculated the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2018 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation in the amount of $15,331. With respect to the annual total compensation of its CEO, FactSet used the amount reported in the “Total” column of the 2018 Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement.
Compensation Risk Assessment
The Compensation and Talent Committee assessed,annually assesses, with the assistance of management, the Company'sour compensation policies and practices to determine whether they create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
FactSet. We believe that risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.FactSet. In reaching this determination, we have takentook into account the design elements of our compensation policies and practices, including a mixture of cash and equity-based compensation, multi-year vesting of equity awards, a claw backclawback policy for senior executives, the use of multiple financial performance measures and internal controls over financial reporting, reasonable performance goals, and oversight by the Compensation and Talent Committee. Based on this analysis, on March 19, 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee concluded that our compensation programs, both executive and broad-based, provide multiple effective safeguards to protect against unnecessary risk-taking, effectively balancing risk and reward in the best interest of our stockholders.
COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation and Talent Committee is responsible for administering FactSet’s executive compensation policies and practices. The Committee is comprised solely of independent directors and reports regularly to the Board of Directors of FactSet.
The Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above and, based on such review and discussion, recommended to the Board that it be included in this Proxy Statement.
SUBMITTED BY THE COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
| | |
| Laurie Siegel, Chair |
| Malcolm Frank |
| Joseph R. Zimmel |
2021 Proxy Statement 55
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The tables below present compensation information for each of our NEOs followed by a discussion of compensation that each NEO could receive when their employment with us terminates under various circumstances or upon a change of control of the Company. The tables include footnotes and other narrative explanations important for your understanding of the compensation information in each table.
The first table below, the Summary Compensation Table, sets forth the compensation earned by the NEOs for services rendered to us in all capacities for each respective fiscal year. Our NEOs include our Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and the three most highly compensated executive officers (other than the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) during fiscal 2021.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation earned or awarded to each NEO for fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus(1) ($) | Stock Awards(2) ($) | Option Awards(3) ($) | Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation(4) ($) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(5) ($) | All Other Compensation(6) ($) | Total ($) |
|
F. Philip Snow (7) Chief Executive Officer | 2021 | $ | 637,077 | | $ | — | | $ | 1,750,063 | | $ | 1,750,005 | | $ | 1,320,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 11,600 | | $ | 5,468,745 | |
| 2020 | $ | 525,846 | | $ | — | | $ | 1,500,061 | | $ | 1,500,055 | | $ | 1,181,900 | | $ | — | | $ | 11,200 | | $ | 4,719,062 | |
| 2019 | $ | 470,192 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 1,499,977 | | $ | 900,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 13,892 | | $ | 2,884,061 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Helen L. Shan (8) Executive Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer | 2021 | $ | 469,615 | | $ | — | | $ | 1,275,238 | | $ | 1,275,076 | | $ | 625,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 11,685 | | $ | 3,656,614 | |
| 2020 | $ | 412,500 | | $ | — | | $ | 600,172 | | $ | 600,034 | | $ | 533,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 14,931 | | $ | 2,160,637 | |
| 2019 | $ | 293,077 | | $ | 225,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 750,004 | | $ | 555,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 16,500 | | $ | 1,839,581 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Goran Skoko (9) Executive Vice President, Managing Director EMEA and APAC, Head of Research & Advisory Solutions | 2021 | $ | 372,308 | | $ | — | | $ | 350,135 | | $ | 350,001 | | $ | 500,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 195,793 | | $ | 1,768,237 | |
| 2020 | $ | 345,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 300,209 | | $ | 300,047 | | $ | 448,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 176,325 | | $ | 1,569,581 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gene D. Fernandez Executive Vice President, Chief Technology and Content Officer | 2021 | $ | 397,308 | | $ | — | | $ | 350,135 | | $ | 350,001 | | $ | 545,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 12,054 | | $ | 1,654,498 | |
| 2020 | $ | 367,500 | | $ | — | | $ | 300,209 | | $ | 300,047 | | $ | 474,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 13,438 | | $ | 1,455,194 | |
| 2019 | $ | 300,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 399,945 | | $ | 495,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 11,000 | | $ | 1,205,945 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Rachel R. Stern Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Global Head of Strategic Resources and Secretary
| 2021 | $ | 372,308 | | $ | — | | $ | 350,135 | | $ | 350,001 | | $ | 517,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 12,054 | | $ | 1,601,498 | |
| 2020 | $ | 345,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 300,209 | | $ | 300,047 | | $ | 474,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 12,692 | | $ | 1,431,948 | |
| 2019 | $ | 298,558 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 524,952 | | $ | 430,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 11,654 | | $ | 1,265,164 | |
1.The amount set forth in the Bonus column reflects a discretionary sign-on cash bonus awarded to Ms. Shan during fiscal 2019 that was not pursuant to FactSet's non-equity incentive plan.
2.The amounts set forth in the Stock Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of performance share unit ("PSU") and restricted share unit ("RSU") awards granted during the applicable fiscal year, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made for the valuation of PSU and RSU awards are disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s
56 2021 Proxy Statement
fiscal 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The grant date fair value of PSU and RSU awards is measured by reducing the grant date price of FactSet's common stock by the present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the underlying stock during the requisite vesting period, discounted at the appropriate risk-free interest rate. The PSUs and RSUs entitle the holders to shares of common stock upon vesting, subject to the achievement of certain performance metrics (except for the RSUs, which are not subject to any performance metrics), but not to dividends declared on the underlying shares while the PSUs and RSUs are unvested. A PSU has value only if FactSet achieves the threshold level of performance set forth in the PSU award. An RSU has no performance metric.
3.The amounts set forth in the Option Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, of the stock options granted to each of our NEOs during the applicable fiscal year. The Company utilizes a lattice-binomial model to estimate the fair value of stock options on the date of grant (or, in the case of a modified option, the date of modification). The assumptions made for the valuation of stock option awards are disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s fiscal 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K. A stock option has value only if the Company’s stock price increases above the stock option exercise price (an “in-the-money” option). If an NEO exercises an in-the-money stock option, he or she would then realize an actual gain. Any gain actually realized for stock options exercised in fiscal 2021 is reported in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table.
4.The amounts set forth in the Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation column represent the annual cash incentives based on the performance of the individual NEO and the performance of FactSet relative to pre-determined objectives for the applicable fiscal year.
5.The amounts set forth in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column represent the aggregate annual increase in actuarial present value of accumulated benefit under defined benefit plans during the applicable year. None of our NEOs participated in any defined benefit or actuarial pension plans in fiscal 2021.
6.The amounts set forth in the All Other Compensation column include employer payments to the applicable individual NEOs for matching contributions to the FactSet 401(k) Plan, expatriate cost of living, housing and education allowances, and other benefits. The following table summarizes the amounts shown in the All Other Compensation column for fiscal 2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| All Other Compensation in Fiscal 2021 |
| Name | Company Contributions to 401(K) Plans(6a) | Expatriate Allowance(6b) | Other(6c) | Total All Other Compensation |
| F. Philip Snow | $ | 11,600 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 11,600 | |
| Helen L. Shan | $ | 11,685 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 11,685 | |
| Goran Skoko | $ | 12,054 | | $ | 172,147 | | $ | 11,592 | | $ | 195,793 | |
| Gene D. Fernandez | $ | 12,054 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 12,054 | |
| Rachel R. Stern | $ | 12,054 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 12,054 | |
a) Amounts shown reflect Company matching contributions to individual NEO's employee 401(k) accounts.
b) Pursuant to Mr. Skoko's expatriate package, Mr. Skoko received a cost of living allowance of $58,884, a housing allowance of $66,003, an education allowance of $24,801, and an automobile allowance of $17,795. Additionally, Mr. Skoko received various benefits cumulatively valued at less than $5,000. Various elements in Mr. Skoko's expatriate package have been converted into U.S. dollars from British pounds based on the average exchange rate for the 2021 fiscal year.
c) Amount shown reflects expenses for tax preparation and planning provided to Mr. Skoko.
7.Mr. Snow received no additional compensation for serving on the Company’s Board of Directors during any of the years presented.
8.Ms. Shan served as our Chief Financial Officer during the entire fiscal 2021 year and through October 4, 2021.
9.Compensation is shown only for those years Mr. Skoko was an NEO.
2021 Proxy Statement 57
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
During fiscal 2021, awards were made to our NEOs under two separate plans or programs:
•Our annual cash incentive plan; and
•Our long-term, equity-based incentive plan, pursuant to which we granted stock option awards, performance share unit awards and restricted share unit awards.
The following table provides information on all plan-based awards granted during fiscal 2021 to each NEO. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value, as listed in this table, will ever be realized. The grant date fair value of the performance share unit awards and restricted share unit awards are included in the "Stock Awards" column of the Summary Compensation Table and the grant date fair value of the stock option awards are included in the "Option Awards" column of the Summary Compensation Table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Grants of Plan Based Awards Table | | | | | |
| | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other Option Awards: | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards
($/Sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(2) |
| Name | Type of Award | Grant Date(1) | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
| Snow | Options(3) | 11/9/20 | | | | | | | 22,370 | | $ | 316.71 | | $ | 1,750,005 | |
PSUs(4) | 11/9/20 | | | | 2,857 | | 5,713 | | 8,570 | | | | $ | 1,750,063 | |
AIP(5) | | $ | 487,500 | | $ | 975,000 | | $ | 1,462,500 | | | | | | | |
| Shan | Options(3) | 11/9/20 | | | | | | | 8,629 | | $ | 316.71 | | $ | 675,047 | |
Options(6) | 5/3/21 | | | | | | | 7,060 | | $ | 342.06 | | $ | 600,029 | |
PSUs(4) | 11/9/20 | | | | 1,102 | | 2,204 | | 3,306 | | | | $ | 675,151 | |
RSUs(6) | 5/3/21 | | | | 1,807 | | 1,807 | | 1,807 | | | | $ | 600,087 | |
AIP(5) | | $ | 225,000 | | $ | 450,000 | | $ | 675,000 | | | | | | | |
| Skoko | Options(3) | 11/9/20 | | | | | | | 4,474 | | $ | 316.71 | | $ | 350,001 | |
PSUs(4) | 11/9/20 | | | | 572 | | 1,143 | | 1,715 | | | | $ | 350,135 | |
AIP(5) | | $ | 200,000 | | $ | 400,000 | | $ | 600,000 | | | | | | | |
| Fernandez | Options (3) | 11/9/20 | | | | | | | 4,474 | | $ | 316.71 | | $ | 350,001 | |
PSUs(4) | 11/9/20 | | | | 572 | | 1,143 | | 1,715 | | | | $ | 350,135 | |
AIP(5) | | $ | 212,500 | | $ | 425,000 | | $ | 637,500 | | | | | | | |
| Stern | Options(3) | 11/9/20 | | | | | | | 4,474 | | $ | 316.71 | | $ | 350,001 | |
PSUs(4) | 11/9/20 | | | | 572 | | 1,143 | | 1,715 | | | | $ | 350,135 | |
AIP(5) | | $ | 200,000 | | $ | 400,000 | | $ | 600,000 | | | | | | | |
Options - Stock Options
PSUs - Performance Share Units
RSUs - Restricted Share Units
AIP - Annual Incentive Plan
(1)On September 21, 2020, the Compensation and Talent Committee approved the total number of stock option and PSU awards to be allocated among all eligible employees and on October 15, 2020, specifically approved the stock option and PSU awards to be granted to the NEOs. On October 22, 2020, the Compensation and Talent Committee designated November 9, 2020, as the actual grant date for the annual equity grant. See note (6) for the one-time grant of a long-term incentive award to Ms. Shan.
58 2021 Proxy Statement
(2)The amounts set forth in the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, of the stock options, PSUs and RSUs granted to each of our NEOs during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2021. The Company utilizes a lattice-binomial model to estimate the fair value of new stock options on the date of grant (or, in the case of a modified option, the date of modification). The assumptions made for the valuation of stock option awards are disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s fiscal 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K. A stock option has value only if the Company’s stock price increases above the stock option exercise price (an “in-the-money” option). If an NEO exercises an in-the-money stock option, they would then realize an actual gain. Any gain actually realized for stock options exercised in fiscal 2021 is reported in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table. The PSUsand RSUs granted to NEOs entitle the holders to shares of FactSet common stock upon vesting, subject to the achievement of certain performance metrics (except for the RSUs, which are not subject to any performance metrics), but not to dividends declared on the underlying shares while the PSUs and RSUs are unvested. The grant date fair value of PSUs and RSUs is measured by reducing the grant date price of FactSet's common stock by the present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the underlying stock during the requisite vesting period, discounted at the appropriate risk-free interest rate.
(3)Options granted under the annual equity grant on November 9, 2020 vest 20% on each anniversary date of the grant over a five-year period. The option awards are service-based and do not contain performance criteria. The option exercise price is equal to 100% of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on November 9, 2020.
(4)Each PSU granted under the annual equity grant on November 9, 2020 represents the right to receive one share of FactSet common stock, subject to adjustment based on our performance during a three-year period from September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2023 (the "Performance Period") measured against certain specified performance goals established for the Performance Period based on our financial plan goals. The performance goals are based 50% on each of (a) our adjusted cumulative operating earnings during the Performance Period and (b) our adjusted cumulative revenues during the Performance Period. Any PSUs earned will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date (November 9, 2023).
(5)These amounts represent the payments which potentially could have been earned under our fiscal 2021 annual cash incentive program.
(6)Effective May 3, 2021, Ms. Shan assumed the role of FactSet's Chief Revenue Officer. In recognition of Ms. Shan's added responsibility, on April 14, 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee approved a one-time grant of a long term incentive award to Ms. Shan with an effective grant date of May 3, 2021 and a total award value of $1,200,000, consisting 50% of stock options and 50% of RSUs. The options granted as part of this one-time grant vest 20% on each anniversary date of the grant over a five-year period, and expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date. The option exercise price is equal to 100% of the closing price of the Company's common stock on the NYSE on May 3, 2021. The dollar value of the stock option award was converted on the grant date to a fixed number of stock options using a stock option pricing formula. Each RSU granted as part of this one-time grant represents the right to receive one share of FactSet common stock. The RSUs vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date (May 3, 2024). Both the options and RSUs are service-based and do not contain performance criteria.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The table below shows each NEO’s outstanding equity grants at August 31, 2021.
•For each outstanding stock option grant, the table shows the stock options that have vested (or that are “Exercisable”) and those not yet vested (or that are “Unexercisable”). One stock option represents the right to buy one share of FactSet common stock.
•For each outstanding equity incentive plan award, the table shows the performance share units ("PSUs") and restricted share units ("RSUs") that have not yet vested. Each PSU represents the right to receive one share of FactSet common stock, subject to adjustment based on our performance during a three-year period starting from the first day of the fiscal year of the respective grant date (the "Performance Period"), measured against certain specified performance goals established for the Performance Period. The performance goals are based 50% on each of (a) our adjusted cumulative operating earnings during the Performance Period and (b) our adjusted cumulative revenues during the Performance Period. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of FactSet common stock and vests three years from the date of grant. The RSUs are service-based and do not contain performance criteria.
2021 Proxy Statement 59
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | Stock Awards |
| Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested | |
| | | | | |
| Snow | 7/1/15 | 60,001 | 39,999 | (2) | $ | 164.90 | | 7/1/25 | | | | | |
| 11/1/16 | 26,368 | 6,593 | (3) | $ | 152.28 | | 11/1/26 | | | | | |
| 11/2/17 | 18,645 | 12,430 | (3) | $ | 189.98 | | 11/2/27 | | | | | |
| 11/1/18 | 10,568 | 15,854 | (3) | $ | 221.88 | | 11/1/28 | | | | | |
| 11/1/19 | 4.984 | 19,938 | (3) | $ | 255.87 | | 11/1/29 | | | 9,159 | $ | 3,482,435 | | (4) |
| 11/9/20 | — | 22,370 | (3) | $ | 316.71 | | 11/9/30 | | | 8,570 | $ | 3,258,485 | | (4) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shan | 9/28/18 | 5,278 | 7,917 | (3) | $ | 223.71 | | 09/28/28 | | | | | |
| 11/1/19 | 1,993 | 7,976 | (3) | $ | 255.87 | | 11/1/29 | | | 3,665 | $ | 1,393,506 | | (4) |
| 11/9/20 | — | 8,629 | (3) | $ | 316.71 | | 11/9/30 | | | 3,306 | $ | 1,257,007 | | (4) |
| 5/3/21 | — | 7,060 | (3) | $ | 342.06 | | 5/3/31 | | | 1,807 | $ | 687,058 | | (5) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Skoko | 11/3/14 | 982 | — | (1) | $ | 131.31 | | 11/3/24 | | | | | |
| 11/2/15 | 7,969 | — | (3) | $ | 175.20 | | 11/2/25 | | | | | |
| 11/1/16 | 6,084 | 1,522 | (3) | $ | 152.28 | | 11/1/26 | | | | | |
| 11/2/17 | 3,729 | 2,486 | (3) | $ | 189.98 | | 11/2/27 | | | | | |
| 11/1/18 | 3,522 | 5,285 | (3) | $ | 221.88 | | 11/1/28 | | | | | |
| 11/1/19 | 997 | 3,988 | (3) | $ | 255.87 | | 11/1/29 | | | 1,833 | $ | 696,943 | | (4) |
| 11/9/20 | — | 4,474 | (3) | $ | 316.71 | | 11/9/30 | | | 1,715 | $ | 652,077 | | (4) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fernandez | 12/22/17 | 9,218 | 6,145 | (3) | $ | 192.11 | | 12/22/27 | | | | | |
| 11/1/18 | 2,818 | 4,227 | (3) | $ | 221.88 | | 11/1/28 | | | | | |
| 11/1/19 | 997 | 3,988 | (3) | $ | 255.87 | | 11/1/29 | | | 1,833 | $ | 696,943 | | (4) |
| 11/9/20 | — | 4,474 | (3) | $ | 316.71 | | 11/9/30 | | | 1,715 | $ | 652,077 | | (4) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stern | 11/1/16 | 5,071 | 1,268 | (3) | $ | 152.28 | | 11/1/26 | | | | | |
| 11/2/17 | 3,729 | 2,486 | (3) | $ | 189.98 | | 11/2/27 | | | | | |
| 11/1/18 | 3,698 | 5,549 | (3) | $ | 221.88 | | 11/1/28 | | | | | |
| 11/1/19 | 997 | 3,988 | (3) | $ | 255.87 | | 11/1/29 | | | 1,833 | $ | 696,943 | | (4) |
| 11/9/20 | — | 4,474 | (3) | $ | 316.71 | | 11/9/30 | | | 1,715 | $ | 652,077 | | (4) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)These stock options vest 60% on the third anniversary date of the award and the remaining 40% vest on the fifth anniversary date of the award.
(2)These options vest 11.11% upon each anniversary date of the grant and will be fully vested after nine years (on July 1, 2024).
(3)These options vest 20% on each anniversary date of the award over a five-year period.
(4)Performance share units ("PSUs") that are subject to vesting contingent on satisfaction of pre-established performance goals measured over a thee-year period. The number of shares shown with respect to PSU awards assumes maximum-level performance. The market value of the PSU awards that have not vested is calculated by multiplying the number of PSUs that have not vested by the closing price of a share of FactSet common stock on August 31, 2021, which was $380.22. PSUs do not entitle the holder to dividends declared on the underlying shares while the PSUs are unvested.
60 2021 Proxy Statement
(5)These restricted share units ("RSUs") vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date (May 3, 2024). The market value of the RSUs that have not vested is calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs that have not vested by the closing price of a share of FactSet common stock on August 31, 2021, which was $380.22.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth information regarding the number and value of stock options exercised and stock awards vested for each NEO during fiscal 2021. Exercised stock options and vested stock from stock awards are not required to be held for a specified period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Option Awards | Stock Awards |
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise | | Value Realized on Exercise(1) | Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting | | Value Realized on Vesting |
|
F. Philip Snow(2) | 27,076 | | | $ | 4,679,114 | | — | | | $ | — | |
| Helen L. Shan | — | | | $ | — | | — | | | $ | — | |
| Goran Skoko | — | | | $ | — | | — | | | $ | — | |
| Gene D. Fernandez | — | | | $ | — | | — | | | $ | — | |
| Rachel R. Stern | 6,809 | | | $ | 1,509,203 | | — | | | $ | — | |
(1)Based upon the market price of the purchased shares on the exercise date less the stock option exercise price paid for such shares.
(2)On October 1, 2019 and September 29, 2020, Mr. Snow entered into approved share trading plans, pursuant to Rule 10b5-1, with effective dates of January 1, 2020 and January 1, 2021, respectively, in order to facilitate his exercise of non-qualified stock options. Mr. Snow had no discretion with regard to the timing of the exercise of his non-qualified stock options under the plans. A broker executes trades pursuant to parameters established by Mr. Snow when the plans were established. Transactions under the plans were disclosed publicly through Form 144 and Form 4 filings with the SEC.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We do not have a compensation deferral program for NEOs, thus the nonqualified deferred compensation table has been omitted for fiscal 2021.
Employee Benefit Plans
We sponsor benefit plans for the majority of our domestic and foreign employees. The U.S. defined contribution plan includes employer matching contributions to the FactSet 401(k) Plan, in which our NEOs participate. Contributions to foreign benefit plans on behalf of our NEOs were not material to FactSet on either an individual or aggregate basis for any periods presented.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control
The amount of compensation payable to each of our NEOs upon termination with cause, termination without cause, termination after change of control, retirement, death or disability, change of control after retirement, and death after retirement is shown in the "Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment, Change of Control or Retirement Table" below. The amounts shown in that table are based on certain assumptions set forth below, as the actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined in the event of and at the time of an NEO's separation from FactSet.
We do not have employment agreements with any of our NEOs. On February 29, 2020, we adopted the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Executive Severance Plan (the “Executive Severance Plan”) with an effective date of March 1, 2020. The Executive Severance Plan covers the CEO and the other NEOs (among other executives and subject to any designation otherwise by the Compensation and Talent Committee). In connection with our adoption of the Executive Severance Plan, we also entered into an equity award letter agreement (the “Equity Award Agreement”) with each of the executives covered by the Executive Severance Plan, including all of the NEOs. We put the Executive Severance Plan and the Equity Award Agreements in place to establish the payments and benefits to be provided in connection with a participating executive’s separation from FactSet under various circumstances, subject to the executive’s ongoing compliance with applicable restrictive covenants, including non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality and execution of a general release of claims in favor of FactSet. For more information on the
2021 Proxy Statement 61
Executive Severance Plan and the Equity Award Agreements, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Executive Severance Plan and Equity Award Agreements" above.
Termination with Cause
If an NEO is terminated with cause, the NEO is not entitled to benefits under either the Executive Severance Plan or the Equity Award Agreements, and all unexercised equity awards (whether vested or unvested) are forfeited immediately.
Termination without Cause
The Executive Severance Plan provides that in the event an NEO's employment is terminated without cause (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan), other than during the two-year period following a change of control (as defined in the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Stock Option and Award Plan, as Amended and Restated (the “Equity Plan”)), the NEO would be entitled to cash severance payments equal to (i) one times the sum of base salary and target bonus (1.5 times for the CEO) paid in substantially equal installments, (ii) a pro rata annual bonus under our annual incentive plan in respect of the year of termination based on actual performance (with individual performance goals deemed achieved at not less than target) and paid when bonuses are normally paid to other senior executives, (iii) reimbursement of the cost of continued coverage under our group health plan for 12 months (18 months for the CEO), and (iv) reasonable outplacement assistance up to $25,000 during the 12-month period following such termination with a firm determined by FactSet.
Each Equity Award Agreement provides that in the event an NEO's employment is terminated without cause other than during the two-year period following a change of control, the NEO's options and restricted stock units ("RSUs") granted at least one year prior to termination will each vest in the next tranche and performance share units ("PSUs") granted at least one year prior to termination will vest pro rata based on length of service before termination and actual achievement of goals for the full performance period. All awards granted less than one year before termination will be forfeited, and all other awards that do not vest will be forfeited as well.
Termination after Change of Control
The Executive Severance Plan provides that in the event an NEO's employment is terminated without cause or by the NEO for good reason (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan) within two years following a change of control, the NEO would be entitled to cash severance payments equal to (i) 1.5 times the sum of base salary and target bonus (2 times for the CEO) and a pro rata target bonus in respect of the year of termination, in each case, payable in a lump sum within 10 days following such termination, (ii) reimbursement of the cost of continued coverage under our group health plan for 18 months (24 months for the CEO), and (iii) reasonable outplacement assistance up to $25,000 during the 12-month period following such termination with a firm determined by FactSet.
In the event an NEO's employment is terminated without cause or by the NEO for good reason within two years following a change of control, the NEO's options and RSUs will vest in full and PSUs will vest with respect to the portion equal to the greater of (i) the pro rata portion based on length of service before termination and deemed achievement of goals at target levels and (ii) the portion of the award that vests based on actual performance through the change of control.
Retirement
The Equity Award Agreements provide the NEOs with certain rights with respect to their outstanding equity awards if the NEOs retire (as defined in the Equity Award Agreements, which requires the NEO to be at least 60 years of age with at least 10 full years of service at FactSet). In the event an NEO retires having met the retirement criteria set out in the Equity Award Agreement, the NEO's options granted at least one year prior to termination will continue to vest, RSUs granted at least one year prior to termination will continue to vest in the next tranche only, and PSUs granted at least one year prior to termination will continue to vest subject to achievement of performance goals. All outstanding awards that do not vest on retirement (including awards granted less than one year before termination) will be forfeited.
62 2021 Proxy Statement
Death or Disability
In the event an NEO's employment is terminated due to death or disability (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan), the NEO's options and RSUs granted at least one year prior to termination will vest in full and PSUs granted at least one year prior to termination will vest assuming achievement of performance goals at target levels. All equity awards granted less than one year prior to termination will be forfeited.
Change of Control after Retirement
In the event of a change of control after an Executive retires (as defined in the Equity Award Agreements, which requires the NEO to be at least 60 years of age with at least 10 full years of service at FactSet), any options and RSUs that are outstanding following retirement and unvested as of the date of the change of control will vest in full, and PSUs that are outstanding following retirement and unvested as of the date of the change of control will vest based on deemed achievement of performance goals at the greater of target and actual performance through the change of control.
Death after Retirement
In the event of an NEO's death following retirement (as defined in the Equity Award Agreements, which requires the NEO to be at least 60 years of age with at least 10 full years of service at FactSet), any options and RSUs that are outstanding following retirement and unvested as of the date of death will vest in full and any PSUs that are outstanding as of retirement and unvested as of the date of death will remain outstanding and eligible to vest based on actual performance.
Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment, Change of Control or Retirement Table
The information in the table below summarizes the compensation that would be paid under plans and contractual arrangements in effect as of August 31, 2021 to each of our NEOs in the event of termination of such executive’s employment with FactSet and/or change of control of FactSet and/or retirement from FactSet as of that date. The amounts assume that the listed officer left FactSet effective August 31, 2021, and that the price per share of FactSet common stock on that date was $380.22. The amounts for unvested stock option awards are based upon the difference between $380.22 and the exercise price of such stock option awards held by the NEO at August 31, 2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Potential Payment or Benefit | Termination
With Cause | Termination Without Cause | Termination after Change of Control | Retirement | Death or Disability | Change of Control after Retirement | Death after Retirement |
| F. Philip Snow | Severance Payment | $ | — | | $ | 3,412,500 | | $ | 4,225,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Equity Treatment | $ | — | | $ | 8,560,189 | | $ | 21,162,222 | | $ | — | | $ | 23,384,228 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Health Benefits | $ | — | | $ | 38,600 | | $ | 51,466 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Outplacement Services | $ | — | | $ | 25,000 | | $ | 25,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Helen L. Shan | Severance Payment | $ | — | | $ | 1,375,000 | | $ | 1,837,500 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Equity Treatment | $ | — | | $ | 1,280,111 | | $ | 4,633,987 | | $ | — | | $ | 4,545,815 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Health Benefits | $ | — | | $ | 12,743 | | $ | 19,114 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Outplacement Services | $ | — | | $ | 25,000 | | $ | 25,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Goran Skoko | Severance Payment | $ | — | | $ | 1,175,000 | | $ | 1,562,500 | | $ | 0 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Equity Treatment | $ | — | | $ | 1,295,959 | | $ | 2,891,356 | | $ | 2,686,919 | | $ | 3,335,960 | | $ | 2,891,356 | | $ | 3,531,686 | |
| Health Benefits | $ | — | | $ | 24,031 | | $ | 36,046 | | $ | 0 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Outplacement Services | $ | — | | $ | 25,000 | | $ | 25,000 | | $ | 0 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Gene D. Fernandez | Severance Payment | $ | — | | $ | 1,250,000 | | $ | 1,662,500 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Equity Treatment | $ | — | | $ | 1,234,704 | | $ | 3,059,907 | | $ | — | | $ | 3,504,511 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Health Benefits | $ | — | | $ | 25,733 | | $ | 38,600 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Outplacement Services | $ | — | | $ | 25,000 | | $ | 25,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Rachel R. Stern | Severance Payment | $ | — | | $ | 1,175,000 | | $ | 1,562,500 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Equity Treatment | $ | — | | $ | 1,251,996 | | $ | 2,875,261 | | $ | — | | $ | 3,319,865 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Health Benefits | $ | — | | $ | 25,733 | | $ | 38,600 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Outplacement Services | $ | — | | $ | 25,000 | | $ | 25,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
2021 Proxy Statement 63
CEO Pay Ratio
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K (collectively, the "Pay Ratio Rule"), we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Snow.
For the fiscal year completed August 31, 2021, the median of the annual total compensation of all employees at FactSet (other than our CEO), was $15,272, and the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement, was $5,468,745. Based on this information, for fiscal 2021, a reasonable estimate, calculated in a manner consistent with the Pay Ratio Rule, of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees was 358 to 1.
The provisions of the Pay Ratio Rule for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
For purposes of the above disclosure, we are required to identify our median employee based on our global workforce, without regard to their location, compensation arrangements, or employment status (full-time versus part-time). At August 31, 2021, we had employees in 24 countries, with approximately 22% of our employees located in the United States and 78% located in other jurisdictions. To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions that we used were as follows:
▪Selected August 31, 2021, as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee,” as it corresponds to our fiscal year end.
▪Provided annualized compensation of all permanent employees who were new hires in fiscal 2021.
▪No cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the “median employee.”
▪Applied the local currency to U.S. dollar exchange spot rate as of August 31, 2021, to the compensation paid to non-U.S. employees to facilitate comparison of all employees in U.S. dollars.
For purposes of measuring the compensation of our employees, we selected base salary or wages plus overtime pay, plus annual cash incentive bonuses, plus allowances, plus equity grants, as the most appropriate measures of compensation. Using this methodology, we determined that our “median employee” was a full-time, salaried employee located in our Hyderabad, India office, where 38% of our employees are based, or 4,145 of our 10,892 employees worldwide at August 31, 2021.
With respect to the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” we identified and calculated the elements of such employee’s compensation for fiscal 2021 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation in the amount of $15,272. With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of the fiscal 2021 Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement.
64 2021 Proxy Statement
Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
As required by Section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
FactSet seekswe seek an advisory, non-binding stockholder vote with respect to compensation awarded to
itsour NEOs.
FactSet providesWe provide this vote on an annual basis.
As previously discussed in the
CD&A, FactSet designs itsCompensation Discussion and Analysis, we design our compensation programs to maintain a performance and achievement-oriented environment throughout
the Company. FactSet’sFactSet. Our executive compensation program is overseen by
the Company’sour Compensation and Talent Committee to encourage decisions and behaviors that align with the long-term interests of
the Company’sour stockholders. The Compensation and Talent Committee has designed the executive compensation policies for
the Company’sour NEOs to meet the following goals and principles:
| ●
| Ensure executive compensation is aligned with FactSet’s corporate strategies and business objectives.
|
| ●
| Balance an executive officer’s compensation between short-term and long-term performance objectives that enhance stockholder value by linking rewards to measurable corporate and individual performance.
|
| ●
| Maintain executive compensation at levels commensurate with relative contributions of other members of senior management.
|
| ●
| Reflect qualitative factors beyond the quantitative financial guidelines as key considerations in the determination of individual executive compensation payments.
|
| ●
| Attract and retain talented personnel by considering compensation offered for similar positions by other companies in the technology and financial information industries.
|
•Ensure executive compensation is aligned with our corporate strategies and business objectives.
•Balance an executive officer’s compensation between short-term and long-term performance objectives that enhance stockholder value by linking rewards to measurable corporate and individual performance.
•Maintain executive compensation at levels commensurate with relative contributions of other members of senior management.
•Reflect qualitative factors beyond the quantitative financial guidelines as key considerations in the determination of individual executive compensation payments.
•Attract and retain talented personnel by considering compensation offered for similar positions by other companies in the technology and financial information industries.
Required Vote
FactSet asks its
We ask our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation awarded to itsour NEOs as described in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives the Company’sour stockholders the opportunity to express their views on FactSet’sour NEO compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of theour NEOs and the compensation philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.
Accordingly, the Company asks itswe ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the meeting:Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the
20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related notes and narrative.”
The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on
the Company,FactSet, the Compensation and Talent Committee, or
itsthe Board.
The Company’sOur Board and its Compensation and Talent Committee value the opinions of
theour stockholders and will take into account the outcome of this vote in considering future compensation arrangements.
| | |
FactSet’s Board Recommends recommends that you vote “FOR”“FOR” the approval,, on an advisory basis, of the Fiscal 2018 2021 Compensation of theNamed ExecutiveExecutive Officers as discloseddisclosed in this Proxy Statement. |
2021 Proxy Statement 65
Proposal 4: Stockholder Proposal - Stockholder Proxy Access
James McRitchie has submitted the following proposal for consideration at the Meeting.
Resolved: Shareholders of FactSet Research Systems Inc. (“Company”) request that our board of directors take the steps necessary to enable shareholders, without limits on group size, to aggregate their shares to equal 3% of our stock owned continuously for 3-years to enable shareholder proxy access with the following essential provisions:
Nominating shareholders and unlimited groups of shareholders must have owned at least 3% of the outstanding
shares of common stock of the Company continuously for a period of at least 3 years. Such shareholders shall
be entitled to nominate a total of 25% of the number of authorized directors rounded down to the nearest whole number.
Supporting Statement: Proxy access enables shareholders to put competing director candidates on the company ballot to see if they can get more votes than some of management’s director candidates. A competitive election is good for everyone. Even if never used, this proposal helps ensure our board will nominate directors with outstanding qualifications to avoid giving shareholders a reason to exercise access rights.
Proxy Access in the United States: Revisiting the Proposed SEC Rule,1 a cost-benefit analysis by CFA Institute, found proxy access would “benefit both the markets and corporate boardrooms, with little cost or disruption,” raising US market capitalization by up to $140.3 billion. Governance Changes through Shareholder Initiatives: The Case of Proxy Access2 found a 0.5 percent average increase in shareholder value for proxy access targeted firms.
Proxy access has been adopted by major companies, including 78% of the S&P 500. Adoption of this proposal will make our Company more competitive in its corporate governance. Our largest shareholders, BlackRock and Vanguard, voted in favor of 87% and 91% of shareholder proposals respectively to establish proxy access during the last 3.5 years.
Adding urgency to this proposal is a recent study finding directors generally do not want to monitor and are not sure they can do so effectively.3 Corporate governance expert Nell Minow offered the following remarks: “Usually directors at least pretend to acknowledge their legal obligation to provide oversight of CEOs on behalf of shareholders.” “This acknowledgment that directors see themselves as corporate cheerleaders instead of skeptics whose job is to push back, question, and insist on better is further proof that shareholders will need to support more Engine No. 1-style challenges.”4
Proxy access without group limits reduces likely hedge fund challenges. Eliminating group limits would allow employee shareholders with small holdings to join in nominating groups, opening communication channels between our Board and workers. Proxy access directors nominated by such groups would be able to more effectively monitor than typical outside directors and would bring a host of additional benefits.5
This proposal should also be seen in the context that our Company has a classified board and shareholders have no right to call a special meeting.
Enhance Shareholder Value, Vote FOR
Shareholder Proxy Access – Proposal 4
66 2021 Proxy Statement
1.https://www.cfainstitute.org/-/media/documents/article/position-paper/proxy-access-in-united-states-revisiting-proposed-sec- rule.ashx
2.https://ssrn.com/abstract=2635695
3.https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/09/02/corporate-directors-implicit-theories-of-the-roles-and-duties-of-boards/
4.https://valueedgeadvisors.com/2021/09/02/corporate-directors-say-its-not-their-job-to-monitor-ceo-study-bloomberg/
5.https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/new-corporate-boardroom/
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST
THIS PROPOSAL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
The Board of Directors of FactSet, after careful review, recently adopted a meaningful and appropriate proxy access right for director nominations by our stockholders, including many of the features requested by the proponent. Adoption of this proposal is therefore unnecessary.
In amending our By-laws to adopt a proxy access provision, the Board carefully considered various potential formulations of proxy access, including the provisions advocated by the proponent and proxy access provisions adopted by our peers and other publicly traded companies. Based upon the Board’s assessment of the relative advantages and disadvantages to the stockholders and the Company of the various proxy access formulations, on September 27, 2021, the Board amended our By-laws to implement proxy access in the form it believes is most appropriate for FactSet and its stockholders.
The Company’s proxy access provision is consistent with many of the features requested by the proponent of this proposal, as well as the mainstream of public company practice. In particular, the Board adopted provisions that permit a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning 3% or more of the voting power entitled to vote in the election of directors continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in our proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of (i) two directors or (ii) 20% of the Board, provided that the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements in our bylaws.
In selecting the appropriate proxy access framework, our Board sought to balance the desire to provide meaningful rights to stockholders who we believe are generally representative of our long-term stockholders against the potential harm to Board effectiveness that may be caused by the nomination of directors who may pursue narrow special interests, including interests unrelated to long-term stockholder value.
The Company’s existing proxy access By-law allows nominating groups to propose the greater of two directors or 20% of our Board, which grants appropriate deference to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s role of nominating directors for the Company’s slate, rather than the 25% of our Board advocated by the stockholder proposal.
Furthermore, the Board chose to limit aggregation to 20 stockholders, which is consistent with overwhelming market practice and makes it more likely that nominating proxy access groups have interests that are aligned with those of our long-term stockholders. The proponent’s proposal of unlimited aggregation is inconsistent with this goal and undermines the principle, that we believe is shared by most of our stockholders, that the right to nominate a director using the Company’s proxy statement should be available only for those who have a sufficient financial stake in the Company to cause their interests to be aligned with the interests of the stockholders as a whole.
Because FactSet already has adopted progressive proxy access By-law provisions that serve the best interests of the Company and our stockholders and are in line with best practices among FactSet's peers and the vast majority of public companies, while the proponent’s proposal is not necessary or appropriate for FactSet, our Board recommends a vote AGAINST the proponent’s proposal.
| | |
| FactSet’s Board recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the Stockholder Proposal |
2021 Proxy Statement 67
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following tables set forth information known to
FactSetus with respect to beneficial ownership of
the Company’sour common stock
as of October 24, 2018 for (i) each director and nominee, (ii) each holder of more than 5% of
FactSetour common stock, (iii)
FactSet’sour Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and the three most highly compensated executive officers (other than the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) named in the table entitled “Summary Compensation
Table”Table,” and (iv) all
our executive officers and directors as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Except as indicated in the footnotes to the tables and pursuant to applicable community property laws, to
FactSet’sour knowledge, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of
FactSetour common stock beneficially owned. The number of shares beneficially owned by each person or group as of
October 24, 2018,a certain date includes shares of
FactSetour common stock that such person or group had the right to acquire on or within 60 days after
October 24, 2018,such date, including upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of
restricted stockequity-based awards.
For each beneficial owner and individual included in the tables below, percentage ownership of common stock is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by the 38,037,295 37,642,107 shares of FactSet common stock outstanding as of October 24, 2018.22, 2021. Any securities that were not outstanding butbut subject to stock options exercisable or the vesting of restricted stockequity-based awards within 60 days after October 24, 2018,the date of a table were deemed to be outstanding in determining the percentage owned by such person, but were not deemed to be outstanding in determining the percentage owned by any other person.
Based on filings made under Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of October
24, 2018,22, 2021, the only persons or entities known by
the Companyus to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of
FactSet’sour common stock were as follows:
| Name and Address of | | Shares of FactSet | | | Percent of | |
| Beneficial Owner | | Common Stock | | | Class | |
The Vanguard Group, Inc. | | | 3,652,096 | (1) | | | 9.6 | % |
100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355(1) | | | | | | | | |
Loomis, Sayles & Company, L.P. | | | 3,297,694 | (2) | | | 8.7 | % |
One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111(2) | | | | | | | | |
BlackRock Fund Advisors | | | 3,251,657 | (3) | | | 8.5 | % |
400 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105(3) | | | | | | | | |
BAMCO, Inc. | | | 2,862,047 | (4) | | | 7.5 | % |
767 Fifth Avenue 49th Floor New York, NY 10153(4) | | | | | | | | |
Wells Fargo & Company | | | 2,152,841 | (5) | | | 5.7 | % |
420 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94163(5) | | | | | | | | |
| (1)
| The information regarding
| | | | | | |
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Shares of FactSet Common Stock | Percent of Class |
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | 4,668,891(1) | 12.4 | % |
The Vanguard Group, Inc. is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The 100 Vanguard Group,Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 | 3,767,467(2) | 10.0 | % |
BAMCO, Inc. with the SEC on February 9, 2018 (the “Vanguard Group 13G/A”). According to the Vanguard Group 13G/A, the figure includes sole voting power with respect to 21,892 shares, shared voting power with respect to 4,721 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,628,610 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 23,486 shares. 767 Fifth Avenue 49th Floor New York, NY 10153 | 2,698,651(3) | 7.2 | % |
| (2)
| The information regarding
Loomis, Sayles & Company, L.P. is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Loomis, Sayles & Company, L.P. with the SEC on February 14, 2018 (the “Loomis 13G/A”). According to the Loomis 13G/A, the figure includes sole voting power with respect to 2,367,207 shares, shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,297,694 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares. One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111 | 2,498,587(4) | 6.6% |
| (3)
| The information regarding BlackRock Fund Advisors is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock Fund Advisors with the SEC on January 29, 2018 (the “BlackRock 13G/A”). According to the BlackRock 13G/A, the figure includes sole voting power with respect to 3,103,802 shares, shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,251,657 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares.
|
(1)The information regarding BlackRock Fund Advisors is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock Fund Advisors with the SEC on January 27, 2021 (the “BlackRock 13G/A”). According to the BlackRock 13G/A, the figure includes sole voting power with respect to 4,149,137 shares, shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,668,891 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares.
(2)The information regarding The Vanguard Group, Inc. is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group, Inc. with the SEC on February 10, 2021 (the “Vanguard Group 13G/A”). According to the Vanguard Group 13G/A, the figure includes sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, shared voting power with respect to 39,935 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,676,764 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 90,703 shares.
(3)The information regarding BAMCO, Inc. is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by BAMCO, Inc. with the SEC on February 12, 2021 (the “BAMCO 13G”). According to the BAMCO 13G, the figure includes sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, shared voting power with respect to 2,578,651 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 0 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,698,651 shares.
(4)The information regarding Loomis, Sayles & Company, L.P. is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Loomis, Sayles & Company, L.P. with the SEC on February 12, 2021 (the “Loomis 13G/A”). According to the Loomis 13G/A, the figure includes sole voting power with respect to 2,013,764 shares, shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 2,498,587 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares.
68 2021 Proxy Statement | (4)
| The information regarding BAMCO, Inc. is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BAMCO, Inc. with the SEC on February 14, 2018 (the “BAMCO 13G/A”). According to the BAMCO 13G/A, the figure includes sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, shared voting power with respect to 2,712,901 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 0 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,862,047 shares.
|
| (5)
| The information regarding Wells Fargo & Company is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Wells Fargo & Company with the SEC on January 29, 2018 (the “Wells Fargo 13G/A”). According to the Wells Fargo 13G/A, the figure includes sole voting power with respect to 18,497 shares, shared voting power with respect to 2,108,307 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 18,497 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,134,094 shares.
|
The table below sets forth, as of October 24, 2018,October 1, 2020, information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’sour common stock by (1) each directorof our directors and each NEO of the CompanyNEOs and (2) by all of the Company’sour directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)(17 persons, of whom four are not NEOs and are not individually named in the table below). Percentage of share ownership amounts are basedbased on 38,037,29537,642,107 shares of FactSetour common stock outstanding as of October 24, 2018.| | | Number of Shares Beneficially | | | Percentage of | |
| Name(1) | | Owned as of October 24, 2018(2)(3) | | | Common Stock | |
| NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS | | | | | | | |
| F. Philip Snow(4) | | | 90,409 | | | ** | |
| Gene Fernandez(5) | | | 3,073 | | | ** | |
| John W. Wiseman(6) | | | 14,004 | | | ** | |
| Maurizio Nicolelli(7) | | | 20,038 | | | ** | |
| Edward Baker-Greene(8) | | | 17,754 | | | ** | |
| | | | | | | | |
| DIRECTORS | | | | | | | |
| Robin A. Abrams(9) | | | 11,234 | | | ** | |
| Scott A. Billeadeau(10) | | | 9,112 | | | ** | |
| Malcolm Frank | | | — | | | ** | |
| Philip A. Hadley(11) | | | 627,745 | | | 1.7% | |
| Sheila B. Jordan | | | — | | | ** | |
| James J. McGonigle(10) | | | 28,680 | | | ** | |
| Laurie Siegel | | | 100 | | | ** | |
| Joseph R. Zimmel(10) | | | 11,031 | | | ** | |
| | | | | | | | |
| ALL DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS A GROUP (16 PERSONS) | | | 857,555 | | | 2.3% | |
22, 2021.
| | | | | | | | |
Name(1) | Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned as of October 1, 2021(2)(3) | Percent of Class |
| | |
| NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS | | |
F. Philip Snow(4) | 149,544 | | ** |
Helen L. Shan(5) | 10,989 | | ** |
Goran Skoko(6) | 33,173 | | ** |
Gene D. Fernandez(7) | 16,333 | | ** |
Rachel R. Stern(8) | 19,746 | | ** |
| | |
| DIRECTORS | | |
Robin A. Abrams(9) | 15,519 | | ** |
Siew Kai Choy(10) | — | | ** |
Malcolm Frank(11) | 4,046 | | ** |
Sheila B. Jordan(12) | — | | ** |
James J. McGonigle(13) | 14,235 | | ** |
Lee Shavel(14) | — | | ** |
Laurie Siegel(15) | 4,224 | | ** |
Joseph R. Zimmel(16) | 1,976 | | ** |
| | |
ALL DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS A GROUP (17 PERSONS)(17) | 314,008 | | ** |
** Percentage of
FactSet common stockcommon stock is less than 1%. | (1)
| The address for each of these beneficial owners is FactSet Research Systems Inc., 601 Merritt 7, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851.
|
| (2)
| Beneficial ownership includes shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock awards within 60 days of October24,2018.
|
| (3)
| To the Company’s knowledge, each executive officer and director, as of October 24, 2018, had sole voting and sole investment power with respect to his or her shares of common stock.
|
| (4)
| Includes 87,141 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock optionsand the vesting of restricted stock awards. Mr. Snow is also a director of the Company.
|
| (5)
| Includes 3,073 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
|
| (6)
| Includes 12,404 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock awards.
|
| (7)
| Includes 17,440 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock awards.
|
| (8)
| Includes 17,651 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
|
| (9)
| Includes 11,234 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
|
| (10)
| Includes8,612 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
|
| (11)
| Includes 25,633 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock awards.
|
(1)The address for each of these beneficial owners is c/o FactSet Research Systems Inc., 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk, CT 06850.
(2)Beneficial ownership includes shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock unit or performance share unit awards within 60 days of October 1, 2021.
(3)To the Company’s knowledge, each executive officer and director, as of October 22, 2021, had sole voting and sole investment power with respect to his or her shares of common stock.
(4)Includes 145,556 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options. Mr. Snow is also a director of the Company.
(5)Includes 10,989 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(6)Includes 29,700 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(7)Includes 16,333 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(8)Includes 19,746 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(9)Includes 11,776 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(10)Includes no shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(11)Includes 4,046 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(12)Includes no shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(13)Includes 9,469 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(14)Includes no shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(15)Includes 4,124 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(16)Includes no shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(17)Includes 292,999 shares of FactSet common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock option and 56 shares of common stock issuable upon vesting of restricted share unit or performance share unit awards within 60 days of October 1, 2021.
2021 Proxy Statement 69
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires
the Company’sour executive officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of
FactSet’sour common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. These persons are required to provide
FactSetus with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. Based solely upon a review of SEC Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to
the Companyus and written representations from
the Company’sour executive officers and directors,
the Company believeswe believe that
all of those persons complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during fiscal
20182021 with respect to transactions in
the Company’s stock except as follows: one Form 4 was filed on July 18, 2018 on behalf of Philip Hadley, a director, reflecting his sale of 70,000 shares of FactSetour common
stock over a two-day period (July 12, 2018 and July 13, 2018). These transactions should have been reported no later than two business days of the date of the transaction but were not reported in time due to the Company’s inadvertent error. Upon discovery of this oversight, FactSet immediately rectified the situation by filing a Form 4 for these transactions on July 18, 2018, two days late for the July 12 transactions and one day late for the July 13 transactions.stock.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table summarizes, as of August 31, 2018,2021, the number of outstanding equity awards granted to employees and non-employee directors, as well as the number of equity awards remaining available for future issuance, under FactSet’sour equity compensation plans:(In thousands, except per share data) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (a) | | | | | | | (c) | |
| | | Number of securities | | | (b) | | | Number of securities remaining | |
| | | to be issued upon exercise | | | Weighted-average | | | available for future issuances under | |
| | | of outstanding options and | | | exercise price of | | | equity compensation plans (excluding | |
Plan category | | restricted stock vesting | | | outstanding options | | | securities reflected in column (a)) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | | 3,286 | (1) | | $ | 153.05 | (2) | | | 6,850 | (3) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 3,286 | (1) | | $ | 153.05 | (2) | | | 6,850 | (3) |
| (1)
| Includes shares
| | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except per share data) | | | |
| Plan category | Number of FactSet common stock subjectsecurities to outstanding restricted stock that will entitle each holder to the issuancebe issued upon exercise of one shareoutstanding options, warrants and rights
(a) | Weighted-average exercise price of common stock as they vest. |
outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b) | (2)
| Calculated without taking into account sharesNumber of FactSet common stock subject to outstanding restricted stock that will become issuable as they vest, without any cash consideration or other payment required for such shares.
|
| (3)
| Includes 282,398 shares available for future issuance under the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option and Award Plan, as Amended and Restated and 268,942 sharessecurities remaining available for purchasefuture issuances under the FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended and Restated.
equity compensation plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 2,474(1) | $214.89(2) | 5,456(3) |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | | — | | — | |
| Total | 2,474(1) | $214.89(2) | 5,456(3) |
(1)Includes 2,277 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, 128 shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding awards of restricted share units and 69 shares issuable upon the conversion of outstanding performance share units.
(2)Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options only.
(3)Includes 5,079,693 shares available for future issuance under the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Stock Option and Award Plan, as Amended and Restated, 237,749 shares available for future issuance under the FactSet Research Systems Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option and Award Plan, as Amended and Restated, and 138,956 shares available for purchase under the FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended and Restated.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Board is committed to upholding the highest legal and ethical conduct in fulfilling its responsibilities and recognizes that related party transactions can present a heightened risk of potential or actual conflicts of interest. Accordingly, as a general matter, it is
FactSet’sour preference to avoid related party transactions.
FactSet’sOur Audit Committee charter requires that members of the Audit Committee, all of whom are independent directors, review and approve all related party transactions for which such approval is required under applicable law, including SEC, NYSE and NASDAQ rules. For purposes of this section, “related person” and “transaction” have the meanings contained in Item 404 of Regulation S-K. Under these rules, a related person is a director, executive officer, nominee for director, or more than 5% stockholder of
the companyFactSet since the beginning of the last fiscal year, and their immediate family members.
The Company monitorsWe monitor any transaction or series of transactions in which
the Company iswe are a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a related person has a direct or indirect material interest. The Audit Committee would determine whether the related person has a material interest in a transaction and would approve, ratify, rescind, or take other action with respect to the transaction in its discretion. In accordance with listing requirements,
the Company doeswe do not have relationships with any non-employee directors in which the director is compensated in excess of $120,000, excluding fees for board service.
In fiscal 2018,2021, there were no related-person transactions under the relevant standards. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and investigating any matters pertaining to the integrity of management, including conflicts of interest and adherence to FactSet’sour Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Under the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, directors, officers and all other members of the workforce are expected to avoid any relationship, influence or activity that would cause or even appear to cause a conflict of interest. FactSet’sOur Corporate Governance Guidelines require a director promptly to promptly disclose to the Board any potential or actual conflict of interest involving him or her.that director. Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board will determine an appropriate resolution on a case-by-case basis. All directors must excuse themselves from any discussion or decision affecting
70 2021 Proxy Statement
their personal, business or professional interests. All related party transactions
shallwill be disclosed in
FactSet’sour applicable filings with the SEC as required under
the applicable rules.
Stockholder Proposals and
Stockholder Nomination of Directors
Stockholders who wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials (other than proxy access nominations, which are described below) to be distributed by the CompanyFactSet in connection with its 2019our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must submit their proposals as provided in the By-laws to the Company’sFactSet's Secretary, Rachel R. Stern, at FactSet’sour principal executive officersoffices so they are received no earlier than August 20, 2019 and no later than September 19, 2019 (or such other dates as determined in accordance with the Company’s By-laws as applicable).July 1, 2022. Any such proposals must also comply with applicable SEC rulesRule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.
Under our proxy access By-law, if a stockholder (or a group of up to be included20 stockholders), who owns 3% or more of the Company’s voting stock continuously for at least three years immediately preceding the date of notice of proxy access nomination, and has otherwise complied with the requirements set forth in our By-laws, wants us to nominate and include director nominees (up to the greater of two nominees or 20% of the Board) in the Company’s proxy materials distributedfor the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the nominations must be received by FactSet’s Secretary, Rachel R. Stern, no earlier than June 1, 2022 and no later than July 1, 2022 (i.e., no earlier than the Company. 150th day and no later than the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date our definitive Proxy Statement was first released to stockholders in connection with our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders).
Stockholders who intend to nominate persons for election tobring an item of business before the Board at the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, other than through Rule 14a-8 or a proxy access nomination, must submit notice in writing of such business or nominations to FactSet’s Secretary, Rachel R. Stern, no earlier than August 19, 2022 and no later than September 18, 2022 (i.e., not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting), as provided in the Company’s By-laws to FactSet’s Secretary within the same time periods as noted previously in this paragraph. advance notice provisions of our By-laws.
Stockholders may also submit names of persons for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for a directorship as discussed under the “Director Nominations” section appearing earlier in this Proxy Statement.
A copy of the By-Law procedures is available upon written request to our Corporate Secretary, Rachel R. Stern.
Delivery of Documents to Stockholders Sharing an Address
If you are a beneficial owner, but not the record holder, of shares, your broker, bank or other nominee may deliver only one copy of
the Company’sour Proxy Statement and Annual Report to multiple stockholders who share an address unless that nominee has received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders.
The CompanyWe will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents were delivered. A stockholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report, now or in the future, should submit their request to
the Company’sour Investor Relations Department at 1-203-810-1000 or by submitting a written request to Rachel R. Stern, Secretary,
601 Merritt 7,at 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk,
Connecticut 06851.CT 06850. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of proxy materials and Annual Reports and wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future will need to contact
yourtheir broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all stockholders at the shared address in the future.
2021 Proxy Statement 71
The Board does not intend to bring any other business before the Meeting and so far as is known to the Board, no matters are to be brought before the Meeting except as specified in the Notice of the Meeting. However, as to any other business which may properly come before the Meeting, it is intended that proxies, in the form enclosed, will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting such proxies.
| | |
|
| Rachel R. Stern |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Global Head of Strategic Resources and Secretary |
| Norwalk, Connecticut |
| October 29, 2021 |
Rachel R. Stern
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Norwalk, ConnecticutOctober 30, 2018
72 2021 Proxy Statement 
▪We continued to make significant developments in our ESG efforts, including our evolving DE&I program, our response to the COVID-19 pandemic and our efforts to ensure employee safety, our environmental sustainability efforts, our employee engagement, and our corporate responsibility activities. See "Corporate Governance - Corporate Sustainability" above.▪We completed the acquisitions of ESG data company Truvalue Labs, BTU Analytics, a leading provider of North American renewables, power, oil, and natural gas data and analytics, and Cabot Investment Technology, an analytics platform that generates behavior-based insights and skills quantification for asset managers and asset owners.▪We launched new data and technology solutions, including an integration with Microsoft Teams, a joint ESG offering with Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd., and the availability of FactSet 
